A collection letter to the car's registered owner
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Alabama attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed October 2022
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
My partner was driving my car when a vehicle pulled out in front of him and stopped. He was going faster than he should have been, and when he tried to go around it the other car came back across into him. The other driver had no license and did not signal. The car was uninsured at the time. The car is in my name and I was not in it. We have both now had a letter from a collection agent for around twenty-five thousand dollars, and he has had a notice that his license will be suspended. How do I handle this?
Attorney Answer
You have asked how to handle his problem, and the more urgent thing is that the letter addressed to you is your problem — the car is in your name, and that is a different exposure from his which needs its own answer. Alongside that there is a fact in your account that may defeat the whole claim.
Start with the fact, because it is the strongest thing here. Alabama is one of a handful of states that still applies contributory negligence, and it changes everything about a claim here. If the person claiming is found to have been negligent themselves, and that negligence helped cause the injury, they recover nothing — not a reduced amount, nothing. There is no apportionment and no percentage.
Two things soften that, and both matter.
It is a defense the other side has to prove. Contributory negligence is an affirmative defense, so the burden is on the defendant to establish it rather than on the claimant to disprove it. And it is not established simply by showing carelessness: the defendant generally has to show the claimant knew of the danger, appreciated it, and failed to take reasonable care anyway. Alabama's courts have said that simple heedlessness is not enough, and that it is normally a question for a jury rather than something decided as a matter of law.
And it is no defense at all to wanton conduct. Where the other party's behavior goes beyond ordinary negligence to wantonness, contributory negligence does not bar the claim. That makes how the other driver's conduct is characterized one of the most consequential questions in an Alabama case.
Apply that to a claim being made against you. Whoever is pursuing this money stands in the shoes of the driver whose damage was paid. You say that driver pulled out in front of your partner, gave no signal, and then came back across the road. If that is established, it is their own negligence contributing to the collision — and in Alabama that does not reduce their claim, it defeats it. That is the single most important feature of the position you are in, and it is the reason not to treat this letter as a bill.
A collection letter is not a judgment. Nobody has decided that either of you owes this. It is a demand, and the fact that it has been sent tells you nothing about whether it would survive being tested. Be careful what you say in response: acknowledging the debt, agreeing a payment, or making one, can affect your position in ways that are difficult to undo.
Your own exposure is a separate question from his and you should get it answered separately. Whether the registered owner of a vehicle is answerable for the driving of someone they allowed to use it is a real question with a real answer, and it is not the same question as whether the driver is liable. You were not in the car. Ask a lawyer about your position as owner specifically — do not let it be folded into his.
On the license suspension, the statute is unusually helpful because it names the ways out. Ala. Code § 32-7-6(a) provides that where the director does not have on file, within the period the section sets, satisfactory evidence that the person has been released from liability, has been finally adjudicated not to be liable, or has executed a duly acknowledged written agreement or conditional release providing for payment of an agreed amount in installments, the director determines the security to be required. Those three routes are the substance of it: the suspension machinery is driven by whether one of them is on file, not by whether anyone has actually decided the case.
One caution about that third route. An installment agreement resolves the suspension by agreeing to pay — which is the opposite of arguing that nothing is owed. Where there is a real defense, taking that route to solve the license problem can concede the money problem. Which of the three to pursue is exactly the decision to take with a lawyer rather than under time pressure from a letter.
What you can do
1. Do not pay anything, agree anything or acknowledge the debt in writing or by phone until you have taken advice. That applies to both of you. 2. Keep every document: both letters, the suspension notice, the crash report, and the receipt for what you have already paid. 3. Get the crash report and check what it records about the other driver — whether the absence of a license and the failure to signal are in it. 4. Write down what the other driver did, and find any witness. That conduct is the defense and it is the part that fades. 5. Ask a lawyer about your position as the registered owner specifically, as a separate question from your partner's position as the driver. 6. Ask that lawyer which of the three routes in § 32-7-6 fits, and specifically whether an installment agreement would concede a claim that might otherwise fail. 7. Deal with the suspension deadline as the urgent item. A defense to the money can be run later; a license, once suspended, is harder to get back than to keep.
⏱ Time limits apply. Ala. Code § 6-2-38(l) gives two years: “all actions for any injury to the person or rights of another not arising from contract and not specifically enumerated in this section must be brought within two years.” Evidence goes sooner — footage is overwritten and memories fade — so the practical deadline is usually much earlier than the legal one.
An Alabama attorney can tell you quickly how the facts here line up, and most will look at a matter like this at no cost.
Cases Cited
Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.
- Knight v. Alabama Power Co., 580 So. 2d 576 (Ala. 1991) — Supreme Court of Alabama
A plaintiff cannot recover in negligence where their own negligence contributed to the harm, regardless of the defendant's negligence; contributory negligence is a complete defense to negligence but not to wanton misconduct. - Lafarge North America, Inc. v. Nord, 86 So. 3d 326 (Ala. 2011) — Supreme Court of Alabama
To establish contributory negligence as a matter of law the defendant must show the plaintiff knowingly placed themselves in danger and consciously appreciated it; simple heedlessness does not suffice, and it is ordinarily a jury question.
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in Alabama
- File or look up a case through the Alabama Judicial System.
- Get free civil legal help from Alabama Legal Help.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the registered owner of a car responsible when someone else was driving?
That is a separate question from the driver's own liability and it turns on the basis on which the owner is said to be answerable — which is not established simply by the car being in their name. An owner who receives a demand arising from someone else's driving should have their own position assessed separately rather than as part of the driver's, particularly where they were not in the vehicle.
Can an insurer's claim for money it paid out be defeated in Alabama?
An insurer pursuing what it paid its own policyholder is in no better position than that policyholder. So if the policyholder's own negligence contributed to the collision, Alabama's contributory negligence rule bars the claim entirely rather than reducing it. Conduct such as pulling out without signalling is therefore relevant not as mitigation but as a complete answer.
How does Alabama's license suspension after an uninsured accident work?
Ala. Code § 32-7-6(a) provides that where the director does not have on file, within the period the section specifies, satisfactory evidence that the person has been released from liability, has been finally adjudicated not to be liable, or has executed a duly acknowledged written agreement or conditional release providing for payment of an agreed amount in installments, the director determines the amount of security required. Those three routes are what the suspension machinery responds to.