1LAW Logo

Attacked in a park by a dog its owner set on you

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Alabama attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed March 17, 2023

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I was walking my two dogs through a park when another dog approached. They began playing and then fighting. The other dog's owner and I tried to separate them, and he then told his dog to attack me, saying it was a guard dog and that I had harassed it. I have multiple broken bones, puncture wounds, and a head injury from hitting a tree.

Attorney Answer

Alabama's dog-bite statute almost certainly does not apply to this, and that is not bad news — what happened here is worse than a dog bite case.

Ala. Code § 3-6-1 looks at first like broad liability for a dog owner, and then the clause after “but” takes most of it away:

If any dog shall, without provocation, bite or injure any person who is at the time at a place where he or she has a legal right to be, the owner of such dog shall be liable in damages to the person so bitten or injured, but such liability shall arise only when the person so bitten or injured is upon property owned or controlled by the owner of such dog at the time such bite or injury occurs or when such person has been immediately prior to such time on such property and has been pursued therefrom by such dog.

The statute reaches a bite only on the owner's own property, or in pursuit from it. A public park is outside it entirely.

So the claim is not a statutory dog-bite claim. On what you describe it is an ordinary negligence claim about how the animal was controlled — and, more seriously, a claim founded on the owner directing the dog to attack. Setting an animal on someone is not negligence at all; it is intentional conduct, and that matters twice over, because contributory negligence is no defense to it.

Alabama still applies contributory negligence. If the claimant's own negligence helped cause the injury they recover nothing at all — not a reduced share. It is an affirmative defense the other side must prove, it needs more than simple heedlessness, and it is no defense to wanton conduct.

Expect the other side to say you provoked the dog or that handling two dogs yourself contributed. The command to attack, if it can be established, is what makes that argument far less powerful than it would otherwise be.

What you can do

1. Write down exactly what was said before the attack, and by whom, while the words are fresh. 2. Identify anyone who was in the park and saw or heard it. 3. Report it to animal control and to the police — setting a dog on a person is not only a civil matter. 4. Photograph every injury as it heals, and keep all treatment records including for the head injury. 5. Speak to an Alabama attorney promptly; the framing of this claim matters more than usual.

⏱ Time limits apply. Ala. Code § 6-2-38(l) gives two years: “all actions for any injury to the person or rights of another not arising from contract and not specifically enumerated in this section must be brought within two years.” Evidence goes sooner — footage is overwritten and memories fade — so the practical deadline is usually much earlier than the legal one.

An Alabama attorney can tell you quickly how the facts here line up, and most will look at a matter like this at no cost.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Knight v. Alabama Power Co., 580 So. 2d 576 (Ala. 1991) — Supreme Court of Alabama
    A plaintiff cannot recover in negligence where their own negligence contributed to the harm, regardless of the defendant's negligence; contributory negligence is a complete defense to negligence but not to wanton misconduct.
  • Lafarge North America, Inc. v. Nord, 86 So. 3d 326 (Ala. 2011) — Supreme Court of Alabama
    To establish contributory negligence as a matter of law the defendant must show the plaintiff knowingly placed themselves in danger and consciously appreciated it; simple heedlessness does not suffice, and it is ordinarily a jury question.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in Alabama

Frequently Asked Questions

When does Alabama's dog-bite statute apply?

Ala. Code § 3-6-1 imposes liability only where the injured person was on property owned or controlled by the dog's owner at the time, or had just been on it and was pursued from it. A bite elsewhere falls outside the section.

What claim is there for a dog attack in a public place?

A claim outside the statute is generally pleaded as common-law negligence in the control of the animal. Where an owner deliberately sets a dog on someone, that is intentional conduct rather than negligence.

Does contributory negligence bar a claim for intentional conduct?

No. Contributory negligence is a defense to negligence. It does not bar a claim founded on intentional or wanton conduct.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices