1LAW Logo

Hit by another driver when your own insurance had lapsed

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Alabama attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed October 13, 2022

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

My insurance had lapsed, and then my vehicle was hit by another driver and is now a total loss. Where does the lapse leave me?

Attorney Answer

Your lapse does not give the driver who hit you a defense. Your claim is against them and it survives the fact that you were uninsured — that is the part people get wrong and it is the part that matters most. What the lapse does cost you is your own safety net, and it may cost you something separately from the claim.

First, the claim itself. You recover from the other driver because they were negligent and their negligence caused your loss. Nothing in that depends on whether you were insured. An insurer for the other driver may raise it, and it is not a defense to their insured's liability. Do not let it be treated as one.

What you have lost is the alternative route. Two coverages would have helped and neither is available on a lapsed policy:

Collision coverage would have paid to replace your vehicle straight away, leaving your insurer to recover from the other driver. Without it you have to wait for the other insurer to accept liability and agree a figure, which takes longer and is entirely in their hands. - Uninsured motorist coverage is the protection that matters if the other driver turns out to have no insurance or cannot be found. Ala. Code § 32-7-23(a) requires Alabama liability policies to provide coverage for insured persons legally entitled to recover from owners or operators of uninsured motor vehicles, though the named insured may reject it. On a lapsed policy the question does not arise, which means if the other driver is uninsured there may simply be nothing behind your loss. Note too that this coverage is for bodily injury or death rather than vehicle damage.

So the first thing to establish is whether the other driver actually has coverage, because that is what determines whether you have a route at all.

Second, and separately: the lapse has consequences of its own. Alabama operates a security and suspension regime around accidents, and § 32-7-6(a) is the section that drives it — where the director does not have on file, within the period the section sets, satisfactory evidence that a person has been released from liability, has been finally adjudicated not to be liable, or has executed a duly acknowledged written agreement providing for payment in installments, the director determines the security required. That machinery does not ask who was at fault before it engages. So being the person who was hit does not by itself keep you out of it, and the fact that you were uninsured when it happened is a separate matter from your claim. If you receive anything about security, suspension or reinstatement, treat it as urgent and do not assume it is a mistake because the collision was not your fault.

Alabama is one of a handful of states that still applies contributory negligence, and it changes everything about a claim here. If the person claiming is found to have been negligent themselves, and that negligence helped cause the injury, they recover nothing — not a reduced amount, nothing. There is no apportionment and no percentage.

Two things soften that, and both matter.

It is a defense the other side has to prove. Contributory negligence is an affirmative defense, so the burden is on the defendant to establish it rather than on the claimant to disprove it. And it is not established simply by showing carelessness: the defendant generally has to show the claimant knew of the danger, appreciated it, and failed to take reasonable care anyway. Alabama's courts have said that simple heedlessness is not enough, and that it is normally a question for a jury rather than something decided as a matter of law.

And it is no defense at all to wanton conduct. Where the other party's behavior goes beyond ordinary negligence to wantonness, contributory negligence does not bar the claim. That makes how the other driver's conduct is characterized one of the most consequential questions in an Alabama case.

Which is the other reason to say little to the other driver's insurer. The lapse is the thing they will find first and the thing they will lead with; your own driving is the thing that could actually hurt you.

What you can do

1. Establish whether the other driver has liability coverage, and get their insurer's details from the crash report. 2. Open the claim against the other driver's insurer directly. Your lapse is not a defense to their insured's liability and should not be accepted as one. 3. Get two independent estimates or valuations of your own before discussing any figure, and photograph the vehicle before it goes anywhere. 4. Deal with anything you receive about security, suspension or reinstatement immediately and on its own terms. It runs on a different track from your claim and it is not answered by not being at fault. 5. Reinstate cover on any vehicle you are driving now, before anything else happens. 6. Do not give the other driver's insurer a recorded statement about the collision or about the lapse before taking advice. 7. Speak to an Alabama attorney, particularly if the other driver turns out to be uninsured or if you were injured. With no uninsured motorist coverage of your own, that scenario is the one with the fewest options and the one worth getting advice on early.

⏱ Time limits apply. Ala. Code § 6-2-38(l) gives two years: “all actions for any injury to the person or rights of another not arising from contract and not specifically enumerated in this section must be brought within two years.” Evidence goes sooner — footage is overwritten and memories fade — so the practical deadline is usually much earlier than the legal one.

An Alabama attorney can tell you quickly how the facts here line up, and most will look at a matter like this at no cost.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Knight v. Alabama Power Co., 580 So. 2d 576 (Ala. 1991) — Supreme Court of Alabama
    A plaintiff cannot recover in negligence where their own negligence contributed to the harm, regardless of the defendant's negligence; contributory negligence is a complete defense to negligence but not to wanton misconduct.
  • Lafarge North America, Inc. v. Nord, 86 So. 3d 326 (Ala. 2011) — Supreme Court of Alabama
    To establish contributory negligence as a matter of law the defendant must show the plaintiff knowingly placed themselves in danger and consciously appreciated it; simple heedlessness does not suffice, and it is ordinarily a jury question.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in Alabama

Frequently Asked Questions

Can you claim against the at-fault driver if your own insurance had lapsed?

Yes. A claim against an at-fault driver rests on that driver's negligence and the loss it caused, and it is not defeated by the claimant having been uninsured. The other driver's insurer may raise the lapse, but it is not a defense to their insured's liability.

What does a lapse in your own policy actually cost you after a crash?

It removes the first-party coverages that would otherwise have responded. Collision coverage would have paid for the vehicle immediately and left the insurer to recover from the at-fault driver, and uninsured motorist coverage under Ala. Code § 32-7-23(a) would have responded if the other driver had no insurance — though that coverage is for bodily injury or death rather than vehicle damage, and the named insured is permitted to reject it.

Can a driver who was not at fault still face a license issue for being uninsured?

The security and suspension machinery in Ala. Code § 32-7-6(a) engages by reference to whether evidence of release from liability, a final adjudication of non-liability, or an acknowledged written installment agreement is on file within the period the section sets. It is not answered simply by the person not having been at fault, so correspondence about security, suspension or reinstatement should be dealt with promptly and separately from the claim.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices