1LAW Logo

Hit from behind just after changing lanes in Alabama

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Alabama attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed July 17, 2024

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I changed lanes, and another car hit me from behind, and we both crashed.

Attorney Answer

Whether the driver behind is at fault depends on how much room you left. Alabama requires the driver behind not to follow more closely than is reasonable and prudent. It also requires you to change lanes only after making sure the move can be made safely, and with a signal. If you completed the change with room to spare, the following driver's duty is the main question. If you cut in close or without signaling, the other side will argue your lane change was contributory negligence, which in Alabama bars recovery entirely, unless the other driver's conduct was wanton.

The driver behind. Ala. Code § 32-5A-89(a):

(a) The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicles and the traffic upon and the condition of the highway. Except when overtaking and passing another vehicle, the driver of a vehicle shall leave a distance of at least 20 feet for each 10 miles per hour of speed between the vehicle that he or she is driving and the vehicle that he or she is following.

Twenty feet for every ten miles per hour is 120 feet at 60 mph. Being hit from behind does not by itself decide fault, though.

Your lane change. Ala. Code § 32-5A-88:

Whenever any roadway has been divided into two or more clearly marked lanes for traffic the following rules in addition to all others consistent herewith shall apply:
(1) A vehicle shall be driven as nearly as practicable entirely within a single lane and shall not be moved from such lane until the driver has first ascertained that such movement can be made with safety.

And Ala. Code § 32-5A-133(a):

(a) No person shall turn a vehicle or move right or left upon a roadway unless and until such movement can be made with reasonable safety nor without giving an appropriate signal in the manner hereinafter provided.

Alabama's contributory-negligence rule. If the other side proves that your own carelessness helped cause the crash, you recover nothing: not a reduced amount, nothing (Knight v. Alabama Power Co., 580 So. 2d 576 (Ala. 1991)). The same case holds that it is no defense to wanton conduct. And it is a high bar for the defense: the Supreme Court of Alabama has held that simple heedlessness is not enough to decide it as a matter of law, and that it is ordinarily a question for the jury (Lafarge North America, Inc. v. Nord, 86 So. 3d 326 (Ala. 2011)). Where a vehicle may have changed lanes just ahead of the driver who hit it, the Court of Civil Appeals held that whether each driver kept a proper lookout, and whether the following driver was contributorily negligent, were questions for the jury: Hinkle v. Burgreen Contracting Co., 678 So. 2d 797 (Ala. Civ. App. 1996).

What you can do

1. Get the crash report and read what it says about the lane change and the following distance.

2. Photograph the damage to both cars; where the impact landed shows how far into the lane you were.

3. Save any dashcam footage, and the names of anyone who saw it.

4. Do not give the other driver's insurer a recorded statement before you have spoken to a lawyer.

5. Even if you are handling this yourself, you would be best served by a brief phone consultation with a local Alabama attorney before you act. Most lawyers offer a short initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts — and on how your court actually handles this — is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. Ala. Code § 6-2-38(l):

(l) All actions for any injury to the person or rights of another not arising from contract and not specifically enumerated in this section must be brought within two years.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Knight v. Alabama Power Co., 580 So. 2d 576 (Ala. 1991) — Supreme Court of Alabama
    A plaintiff cannot recover in negligence where their own negligence contributed to the harm, regardless of the defendant's negligence; contributory negligence is a complete defense to negligence but not to wanton misconduct.
  • Lafarge North America, Inc. v. Nord, 86 So. 3d 326 (Ala. 2011) — Supreme Court of Alabama
    To establish contributory negligence as a matter of law the defendant must show the plaintiff knowingly placed themselves in danger and consciously appreciated it; simple heedlessness does not suffice, and it is ordinarily a jury question.
  • Hinkle v. Burgreen Contracting Co., 678 So. 2d 797 (Ala. Civ. App. 1996) — Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
    Where a vehicle may have changed lanes just ahead of a following driver, lookout and contributory negligence were fact questions for the jury.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in Alabama

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the driver who rear-ends you always at fault in Alabama?

No. Ala. Code § 32-5A-89(a) requires a following distance of at least 20 feet for each 10 miles per hour, but being struck from behind does not by itself decide fault, especially just after a lane change.

What does Alabama require before changing lanes?

Under Ala. Code § 32-5A-88(1), a driver may move from a lane only after first making sure the move can be made safely, and § 32-5A-133(a) requires an appropriate signal.

Can my lane change bar my claim in Alabama?

It can, if the other side proves it was negligent and helped cause the crash: Alabama's contributory-negligence rule bars recovery entirely (Knight v. Alabama Power Co., 580 So. 2d 576 (Ala. 1991)), though it is ordinarily a jury question (Lafarge North America, Inc. v. Nord, 86 So. 3d 326 (Ala. 2011)).

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices