Hitting a car that had been broken down in a lane for days
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Alabama attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed April 16, 2024
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
I was leaving my workplace when I hit a car that had broken down in the exit lane. It had been there for three days and its owner had been told repeatedly to move it. Am I automatically at fault and responsible for the car?
Attorney Answer
No, not automatically — and the fact that the vehicle had sat in a live lane for three days after repeated warnings is the strongest thing in your account.
The question of whether you were driving carefully and the question of whether the other owner created the hazard are separate, and both can be answered against the same collision. Ala. Code § 32-5A-89(a) sets the standard, and Alabama puts a number on it where most states do not:
The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicles and the traffic upon and the condition of the highway. Except when overtaking and passing another vehicle, the driver of a vehicle shall leave a distance of at least 20 feet for each 10 miles per hour of speed between the vehicle that he or she is driving and the vehicle that he or she is following.
Twenty feet for every ten miles per hour is 120 feet at 60 mph. It is a concrete duty — but a breach of it is evidence of negligence, not an automatic answer, and being struck from behind does not by itself decide fault.
Applied here, the duty runs to what a careful driver should have seen and done in that lane. But a vehicle abandoned for days in an exit lane, where the owner had been told to move it, raises the other side of the ledger: whether the owner's own conduct caused or contributed to the collision.
Alabama still applies contributory negligence. If the claimant's own negligence helped cause the injury they recover nothing at all — not a reduced share. It is an affirmative defense the other side must prove, it needs more than simple heedlessness, and it is no defense to wanton conduct.
That cuts your way here, not against you. If the owner claims against you, their own negligence in leaving the car in a traffic lane is exactly the kind of conduct that can defeat their claim entirely under Alabama law. The repeated warnings are what make it provable rather than merely arguable.
The practical question is evidence: who told them to move it, when, and whether any of that was written down.
What you can do
1. Ask your employer whether the instructions to move the vehicle were recorded anywhere in writing. 2. Identify anyone who witnessed the car sitting there over the three days. 3. Check whether any camera covers the exit lane, and ask for the footage in writing now. 4. Photograph the position of both vehicles and the lane before anything is moved. 5. Report it to your own insurer and speak to an Alabama attorney before accepting responsibility.
⏱ Time limits apply. Ala. Code § 6-2-38(l) gives two years: “all actions for any injury to the person or rights of another not arising from contract and not specifically enumerated in this section must be brought within two years.” Evidence goes sooner — footage is overwritten and memories fade — so the practical deadline is usually much earlier than the legal one.
An Alabama attorney can tell you quickly how the facts here line up, and most will look at a matter like this at no cost.
Cases Cited
Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.
- Knight v. Alabama Power Co., 580 So. 2d 576 (Ala. 1991) — Supreme Court of Alabama
A plaintiff cannot recover in negligence where their own negligence contributed to the harm, regardless of the defendant's negligence; contributory negligence is a complete defense to negligence but not to wanton misconduct. - Lafarge North America, Inc. v. Nord, 86 So. 3d 326 (Ala. 2011) — Supreme Court of Alabama
To establish contributory negligence as a matter of law the defendant must show the plaintiff knowingly placed themselves in danger and consciously appreciated it; simple heedlessness does not suffice, and it is ordinarily a jury question.
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in Alabama
- File or look up a case through the Alabama Judicial System.
- Get free civil legal help from Alabama Legal Help.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the moving driver always at fault for hitting a stationary vehicle?
No. The moving driver's care is one question and whether the stationary vehicle created a hazard is another. Both are decided on the evidence.
Can the other party's own negligence defeat their claim in Alabama?
Yes. Alabama applies contributory negligence, so a claimant whose own negligence helped cause the collision recovers nothing at all.
What does Alabama require about following distance?
Ala. Code § 32-5A-89(a) requires a driver not to follow more closely than is reasonable and prudent, and to leave at least 20 feet for each 10 miles per hour of speed except when overtaking.