1LAW Logo

Hitting a van whose lights and plate were covered

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Alabama attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed November 2, 2024

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I hit a van that had not pulled fully into a driveway. It had a bike rack on the back covering its license plate and its lights. My truck took damage to the passenger-side headlight and mirror. Where do I stand?

Attorney Answer

In most states the fact that the van's lights were covered would reduce what it could recover from you. In Alabama it can do something far more useful than that — it can defeat the claim outright.

Alabama's contributory negligence rule is the thing to understand, because it cuts in both directions and most people only notice one of them. A claimant whose own negligence helped cause the harm recovers nothing at all — not a reduced share. So if you are the one claiming, any carelessness of your own is fatal to your claim rather than merely expensive. But the same rule is the strongest defense there is when somebody claims against you: if the person claiming contributed to the collision even slightly, their claim fails outright.

Two limits travel with it. It is an affirmative defense, so the side raising it has to prove it, and proving it takes more than showing simple carelessness — generally that the person knew of the danger, appreciated it, and failed to take reasonable care anyway. And it is no defense at all to wanton conduct, so how the other party's behavior is characterized can decide whether the rule applies.

That is why the bike rack is the most important fact you have given. A vehicle that is not fully clear of the roadway, at night or in poor light, with its rear lights and plate obscured by a rack, is a vehicle whose own driver has a serious problem. Rear lights exist so that a driver approaching from behind can see the vehicle and judge its position and distance. Covering them is not a technicality — it goes directly to whether the van driver took reasonable care for their own safety and everyone else's.

If the van's driver claims against you, that is a contributory negligence defense, and in Alabama it is not a discount. If it is established, their claim fails. That is the single most consequential feature of Alabama law for the position you are in.

Now the same rule in the other direction, because it applies to you too. If you want to recover for the damage to your own truck, your own care is examined the same way — your speed, your attention, your lights, and whether a reasonable driver would have seen and avoided the van despite the obscured lighting. Any carelessness on your part defeats your claim just as completely.

So this is a case where both sides may have a complete defense to the other, which in practice often means neither recovers and each bears their own damage. That is an unsatisfying answer and it is the honest one.

What decides it is the evidence about the van's position and visibility, and that evidence is perishable. Whether it was partly in the carriageway, how far, what the light was like, and whether the rack covered the lamps completely or partly — those are facts, and in a week the van will have been repaired and the rack taken off.

What you can do

1. Photograph the van's rear with the bike rack in place if you can still do it, showing exactly what the rack covers. This is the fact the whole matter turns on and it disappears the moment the rack comes off. 2. Photograph where the van was standing relative to the driveway and the road, and the sightlines on the approach. 3. Note the light conditions and the time, and whether the van's lights were on at all. 4. Get the crash report and check whether the obscured plate and lights were recorded. If they were not, your own photographs become the only record. 5. Identify any witness who saw the van's position before the impact. 6. Report it to your own insurer promptly, and give them the photographs of the rack. 7. Speak to an Alabama attorney before giving any recorded statement, and ask specifically about contributory negligence — in Alabama it works differently from almost everywhere else and it is the center of this.

⏱ Time limits apply. Ala. Code § 6-2-38(l) gives two years: “all actions for any injury to the person or rights of another not arising from contract and not specifically enumerated in this section must be brought within two years.” Evidence goes sooner — footage is overwritten and memories fade — so the practical deadline is usually much earlier than the legal one.

An Alabama attorney can tell you quickly how the facts here line up, and most will look at a matter like this at no cost.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Knight v. Alabama Power Co., 580 So. 2d 576 (Ala. 1991) — Supreme Court of Alabama
    A plaintiff cannot recover in negligence where their own negligence contributed to the harm, regardless of the defendant's negligence; contributory negligence is a complete defense to negligence but not to wanton misconduct.
  • Lafarge North America, Inc. v. Nord, 86 So. 3d 326 (Ala. 2011) — Supreme Court of Alabama
    To establish contributory negligence as a matter of law the defendant must show the plaintiff knowingly placed themselves in danger and consciously appreciated it; simple heedlessness does not suffice, and it is ordinarily a jury question.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in Alabama

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Alabama reduce a claim when both drivers were partly careless?

No. Alabama applies contributory negligence rather than comparative fault, so a claimant whose own negligence helped cause the harm recovers nothing rather than a reduced share. It is an affirmative defense that the party raising it must prove, generally by showing the claimant knew of the danger and appreciated it, and it is no defense to wanton conduct.

Does a vehicle with obscured lights or plate affect who is responsible for a collision?

It can matter a great deal. Rear lights allow an approaching driver to see a vehicle and judge its position and distance, so lights obscured by a rack or a load go directly to whether that vehicle's driver took reasonable care. In a contributory negligence state that evidence bears on whether their own claim survives at all, not merely on how much it is worth.

What happens when both drivers in a collision were careless in Alabama?

Because contributory negligence bars a claim entirely rather than reducing it, a collision in which each driver contributed can end with neither able to recover from the other, each bearing their own damage. Whether that is the outcome depends on what can actually be proved about each driver's conduct, which makes the physical evidence unusually important.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices