Reentry as a Green Card Holder With Two Old DUI Convictions
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Colorado attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Managing Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed January 1, 2026
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
I have 2 dui’s from Wisconsin they’re over 20 years ago. I went to jail for 120 days in 2006 for the second one, the second one happened in December 2002. Jail sentence happened in 2006. Aggravating factors were dismissed. I’m leaving the country in 2 weeks for a vacation and I need to know if I will be allowed back. I have a green card since 1993.
Attorney Answer
You will most likely be readmitted, but the reason matters more than the reassurance: as a returning permanent resident you are generally not treated as seeking admission at all, so the inadmissibility grounds do not apply to you unless one of six specific things is true.
That rule is 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(13)(C). A lawful permanent resident returning from a trip abroad is not regarded as seeking an admission unless the person (i) has abandoned or relinquished status, (ii) has been absent more than 180 continuous days, (iii) engaged in illegal activity after departing, (iv) departed while under legal process seeking removal or extradition, (v) has committed an offense identified in 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2), or (vi) attempts to enter at an undesignated time or place or without inspection. A two-week vacation with a valid green card does not touch (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) or (vi). Everything therefore rides on (v).
The § 1182(a)(2) ground that could matter is 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(I): a noncitizen convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude is inadmissible. Whether a DUI qualifies depends on the elements of the Wisconsin statute you were convicted under, not on how long the sentence was or how serious it felt.
There is a trap in the escape hatch. The petty offense exception, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(ii)(II), applies only where the person committed only one crime, the maximum possible penalty did not exceed one year, and the sentence imposed was not more than six months. You have two convictions. If both were treated as crimes involving moral turpitude, that exception would not be available to you.
What you can do — before you fly, not after
1. Order certified copies of the judgment of conviction and complete disposition for both Wisconsin cases, including the statute subsection you pled to and the exact sentence imposed. Do this this week; Wisconsin clerks are not fast. 2. Take those certified copies with you, along with your green card and evidence of your continuing ties here. 3. Have an immigration lawyer read the two statutes of conviction against the moral-turpitude standard before you leave. This is a one-hour question for someone who does it regularly. 4. Keep the trip short and return well within the 180-day line. 5. If you are sent to secondary inspection, ask to speak with a lawyer and do not sign anything giving up your permanent resident status.
⏱ Time limits apply. The 180-continuous-day absence line in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(13)(C)(ii) is a hard statutory threshold, and once you are outside the United States an admissibility problem is far harder and slower to fix than it is from inside. How the rest of § 1101(a)(13)(C) applies depends on your specific convictions.
Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship. Conversations are for informational purposes based on what you share.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in Colorado
- File or look up a case through the Colorado Judicial Branch.
- Get free civil legal help from Colorado Legal Services.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does it help that these convictions are more than twenty years old?
Age alone is not a defense under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(I) — that ground has no time limit built into it. What actually helps is that as a returning resident you are not treated as an applicant for admission under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(13)(C) unless subclause (v) is triggered, and that turns on the elements of the offenses, not their age.
I already served the 120 days. Doesn't that mean it is behind me?
Serving the sentence closes the criminal case; it does not answer the immigration question. Note that the petty offense exception at 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(ii)(II) looks at both the maximum possible penalty for the offense and the sentence actually imposed — but it is available only to someone with a single qualifying crime, and you have two convictions.
Should I just cancel the trip?
That is a judgment call that depends on what the Wisconsin records actually show. The point of getting the certified dispositions now is that they let a lawyer answer the question before you are standing at a port of entry, where your options are far narrower. Do the records first, then decide.