What to Do Before a Georgia DUI Court Date After Refusing the Test
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Georgia attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Managing Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed January 1, 2026
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
This is my first offense DUI and am not sure what steps to take. I did refuse blood test and was unable to do any field sobriety tests. My court date is December 4th. What should I do between now and then?
Attorney Answer
The most urgent deadline in your case is not December 4 — it is the licence case, and it is already running. Because you refused the state-administered test, Georgia started a separate administrative suspension, and you have 30 days from the date you received that notice, plus a $150 filing fee, to demand a hearing. Miss it and the suspension stands no matter what happens in criminal court.
The governing law. O.C.G.A. § 40-5-67.1 sets out the implied consent notices at subsection (b) that must be read on arrest. Subsection (g)(1) provides that a driver whose licence is suspended for refusing or failing the state-administered test must remit a $150 filing fee together with a written request for a hearing "within 30 days from the date of personal notice or receipt of notice sent by certified mail" — and where notice was mailed, subsection (f)(2) treats it as received three days after mailing. That is an administrative track that runs independently of, and much faster than, your criminal case.
Understand what that means: you have two cases, not one. The licence case is decided by a different tribunal under a different standard of proof from the criminal case, and the two can reach opposite results on the same traffic stop. Winning the criminal case does not undo an administrative suspension you never contested, and losing the licence hearing does not convict you of anything.
On the criminal side, O.C.G.A. § 40-6-391 defines the offence. Because you refused the test and could not perform field sobriety tests, the State will proceed under the "less safe" theories at (a)(1) or (a)(2), proving impairment through the officer's observations and other circumstantial evidence rather than a chemical result. Do not assume that refusing disabled the prosecution. It did not.
What the courts have held. In State v. Randall, 315 Ga. 198, 880 S.E.2d 134 (2022), the Supreme Court of Georgia vacated a trial court order that had suppressed evidence of a DUI defendant's refusal to submit to a warrantless blood test, and expressly declined to reach the constitutional question. Because the State limited itself on appeal to offering the refusal only to explain why no chemical test results existed, and both sides agreed refusal evidence is admissible for that limited purpose, a constitutional ruling was unnecessary. Note the direction of that ruling: the trial court had ruled for the defendant and the Supreme Court took that ruling away. The practical upshot is that the jury will likely hear that you refused, at least as an explanation for the absence of test results; whether refusal can be used more broadly as substantive evidence of guilt remains an open question, and having limited itself, the State may not seek a jury instruction inviting any other inference.
One narrower point worth your lawyer's attention. In State v. Stroud, 344 Ga. App. 885, 812 S.E.2d 83 (2018) — which is physical precedent only under Court of Appeals Rule 33.2(a), meaning persuasive rather than binding — the arresting officer misread the implied consent notice, telling the driver his licence "may be suspended" instead of "will be suspended." The Court of Appeals held that error substantively changed the notice by converting a mandatory consequence into a permissive one, deprived the driver of an informed choice under O.C.G.A. § 40-5-67.1(b), and warranted suppression of the refusal evidence. Nothing you have told me suggests the notice was misread to you. But because you do not remember much of the arrest, the exact words the officer used are worth checking against the video.
What you can do
1. Find the notice you were given at the arrest, look at its date, and count. If you are inside the 30-day window in O.C.G.A. § 40-5-67.1(g)(1), file the written hearing request with the $150 fee today, not tomorrow. 2. Apply for a public defender. Do it now rather than at the December 4 calendar call — tell the clerk you cannot afford counsel and ask for the application. A lawyer appointed before the hearing deadline is worth far more than one appointed after it. 3. Request the bodycam and dashcam video and the officer's report through counsel, and preserve them. Video is routinely overwritten on a fixed retention schedule. 4. Have someone check the exact wording of the implied consent notice as read to you on the video, against subsection (b). That is the Stroud issue, and it is checkable in ninety seconds. 5. If a medical condition, medication, injury, or head strike explains why you cannot remember the arrest or could not perform field tests, get the medical records now and give them to counsel. That fact cuts in two directions and your lawyer needs it early. 6. Do not write out your own account of what happened. Notes you create yourself are not protected by attorney-client privilege, can be seized or subpoenaed, and can be used to impeach you if your testimony later differs. Instead preserve the records that already exist — texts, call logs, emails, receipts, photos and location history — along with the names and contact details of any witnesses, and give your account to your attorney verbally. 7. Do not discuss the case with anyone but your lawyer, including on the phone from any jail line.
⏱ Time limits apply. The administrative licence deadline comes first and it is the one people lose: O.C.G.A. § 40-5-67.1(g)(1) requires the written hearing request and the $150 fee within 30 days of personal notice or receipt of mailed notice, with subsection (f)(2) deeming mailed notice received three days after mailing. That window will close before or around your December 4 court date, and the criminal case cannot revive it. A refusal suspension is also generally a harder suspension to work around than one that follows a failed test, so treat this as the emergency it is. Your exact deadline depends on the date and manner of the notice you were given — check the document itself.
Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship. Conversations are for informational purposes based on what you share.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in Georgia
- File or look up a case through the Georgia Courts.
- Get free civil legal help from GeorgiaLegalAid.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
If I win the criminal case, does my licence come back automatically?
No. The administrative suspension under O.C.G.A. § 40-5-67.1 is a separate proceeding from the criminal prosecution, with its own hearing and its own deadline, and it can end differently from the criminal case on the same facts. If you never requested the hearing within the 30-day window in subsection (g)(1), the suspension stands regardless of what the criminal court does.
Can the State convict me without any test result?
Yes. O.C.G.A. § 40-6-391(a)(1) and (a)(2) are the 'less safe driver' theories, and they do not require a chemical result — the State proves impairment through the officer's observations, driving behaviour and other circumstantial evidence. Refusing removed one category of evidence; it did not remove the charge.
Will the jury be told that I refused?
Very likely, at least in part. State v. Randall establishes that refusal evidence is admissible to explain why no chemical test results exist, and the Supreme Court of Georgia vacated a trial court order suppressing it. Whether refusal can be used more broadly as evidence of guilt was left open, and that is an argument your lawyer can still make.