Settling Directly With an Insurer While Represented by a Lawyer
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Nevada attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Managing Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed January 1, 2026
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
I'm ate so hard to get an answer online. I'm trying to find out if we can go to the insurance company and request compensation for the accident that was not my fault and it both work parties were insured. But we got a lawyer and they're dilly-dallying. And I want to know if we can go straight to the insurance company we need to pay out.
Attorney Answer
You can fire your lawyer at any time and you can talk to the insurer yourself — but going around a lawyer you have not fired usually fails, and the fee does not disappear just because you settle the claim on your own.
While you are represented, an adjuster will normally refuse to negotiate with you directly and will route everything back to your attorney. So the practical choice is not "deal with the insurer instead of the lawyer." It is: press your lawyer for movement, or discharge the lawyer and then deal with the insurer.
If you discharge, the fee question does not vanish. NRS 18.015 creates an attorney's lien on a client's claim or cause of action. The attorney perfects it by serving written notice — in person or by certified mail, return receipt requested — on the client and, where applicable, on the party against whom the client has a cause of action, claiming the lien and stating its amount. The lien attaches to any verdict, judgment, decree, money, or property recovered "from the time of service of the notices required by this section."
That timing language decides real cases. In Leventhal v. Black & LoBello, 129 Nev. 472, 305 P.3d 907 (2013), the Supreme Court of Nevada held that a charging lien is not self-executing. It attaches only from the time the statutory notices are served, and only to an affirmative recovery of money or property in the underlying matter. The court reversed a judgment enforcing a firm's lien where the firm had not made even a colorable attempt to perfect it until eight months after the settlement had already occurred. The firm could still pursue its fees by other means — it just could not do it through an untimely charging lien. Two cautions: Leventhal arose from a divorce, not a personal injury settlement, and NRS 18.015 was amended in the same year it was decided, so do not treat it as a formula for avoiding a fee.
One more thing worth hearing. "Dilly-dallying" is often a lawyer waiting for you to finish medical treatment before sending a demand, because settling before then locks in a number that ignores care you still need. Ask before you assume.
What you can do
1. Write to your lawyer and ask four specific questions: has a demand been sent and when, what records are still outstanding, what is the limitations date on the calendar, and what is the plan and timeline. Ask for a written answer. 2. If the answer is that they are waiting on your treatment, that is usually the correct call. Ask when your doctor expects you to be done. 3. Before firing anyone, get a second opinion from another Nevada injury attorney. Many will take over a file, and a substitution is cleaner than going unrepresented. 4. If you do discharge, do it in writing and request your complete file. 5. Read your fee agreement now. It governs what the firm can claim if you end the relationship, alongside any lien under NRS 18.015. 6. Do not sign a release with the insurer before you know every claim against the settlement — the former firm's fee, medical provider bills, and any health plan reimbursement. Signing first and sorting it out later is how people end up with nothing.
⏱ Time limits apply. Nevada's deadline for filing the personal injury lawsuit keeps running throughout settlement talks and while you change lawyers, and no insurer will remind you of it. Confirm the exact date with counsel; it depends on your specific facts.
Cases Cited
Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.
- Leventhal v. Black & LoBello, 129 Nev. 472, 305 P.3d 907 (2013) — Supreme Court of Nevada
An attorney's charging lien under NRS 18.015 is not self-executing against whatever the client ends up with. It attaches only from the time the statutory notices are served, and only to an affirmative recovery of money or property obtained in the underlying matter. The Nevada Supreme Court reversed a judgment enforcing a firm's charging lien where the firm did not make even a colorable attempt to perfect the lien until eight months after the property settlement had already taken place, and where the other asserted benefit (retained child-custody rights) was not a tangible recovery to which a lien could attach. The firm remained free to pursue its fees by other means, but not through the untimely charging lien.
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in Nevada
- File or look up a case through the Nevada Judiciary.
- Get free civil legal help from Nevada Legal Services.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will the insurance company talk to me if I still have a lawyer?
Generally no. Carriers route communications through counsel of record while you are represented, so calling the adjuster directly usually accomplishes little. If you want to negotiate personally, the relationship has to be formally ended first.
If I fire my lawyer, do I still owe a fee?
Usually something, yes. Your fee agreement controls, and NRS 18.015 gives the attorney a lien that attaches from the time proper written notice is served, against any recovery. Leventhal shows a firm losing its lien for perfecting it far too late, but that is a defect in the firm's timing, not a general rule that discharge erases the fee.
Is a slow case a sign of a bad lawyer?
Not by itself. Injury cases commonly sit while treatment finishes and records are collected, because a demand sent too early undervalues the claim. What is not acceptable is silence. Ask for a written status and a calendared limitations date; if you cannot get either, that is a real reason to look elsewhere.