Hit by something thrown at your car in New York: two defendants, two very different deadlines
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced New York attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed November 29, 2021
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
I got egged in the face while reversing, and I ended up hitting another car.
Attorney Answer
Being struck in the face by an object thrown from outside your car does not automatically excuse the collision, but it puts a second and entirely separate defendant into the picture — the person who threw it — and the claim against that person runs on a one-year clock rather than the three-year clock that governs the collision.
Start with the collision. Liability between two drivers is decided by ordinary negligence: whether the driver acted reasonably in the circumstances. New York courts have long recognized a doctrine that measures a driver's reaction to a sudden and unexpected emergency, not of the driver's own making, by what was reasonable under those conditions rather than by hindsight. That doctrine is judge-made, and whether it fits what happened to you is exactly the kind of question that gets decided on the specific facts — how far you had moved, what you could see, and whether the egg strike genuinely deprived you of control. It is a real argument, not a guarantee.
What that argument affects is your share, and in New York a share is not a bar. CPLR 1411(a) provides: "Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, in any action to recover damages for personal injury, injury to property, or wrongful death, the culpable conduct attributable to the claimant or to the decedent, including contributory negligence or assumption of risk, shall not bar recovery. The amount of damages otherwise recoverable shall be diminished in the proportion which the culpable conduct attributable to the claimant or decedent bears to the culpable conduct which caused the damages." Fault can be apportioned among more than two people, and the person who threw the egg is one of them.
The deadlines diverge sharply, and this is the part most easily lost. A claim over damage to the other car — or to yours — falls under CPLR 214(4), which places an action to recover damages for an injury to property in the three-year list, measured from the date of the incident. But throwing an object at a person is an intentional tort, and CPLR 215 requires that an action to recover damages for assault or battery be commenced within one year. A person who spends two years arguing with insurers about the collision and only then looks for the egg-thrower may find the shorter period already gone. If a criminal case were ever brought against that person over the same event, CPLR 215(8) gives a civil claimant at least one year from the termination of that criminal action, which is a narrow lifeline and not a substitute for acting early.
One practical note: if a traffic ticket was issued to you over the collision, that proceeding is separate from any insurance or civil dispute, and how it is resolved can matter later in the civil case. Ask an attorney about it before disposing of it, rather than after.
What you can do
1. Report the incident to your own insurer promptly and describe it accurately, including the object that struck you — the sequence is part of the claim, not a detail.
2. Preserve anything that identifies who threw it: dashcam or phone video, nearby business or doorbell camera footage, and the names of anyone who saw it. That evidence disappears within weeks.
3. Photograph the interior and exterior of your car, including the residue, before it is cleaned or repaired.
4. Ask the police whether a report exists and get the report number; a thrown-object incident may be documented separately from the collision.
5. Write down the date, time and exact location while you still remember them — the one-year period for an assault or battery claim is measured from that day.
6. Have a New York attorney look at both claims together, because the shorter deadline belongs to the defendant who is hardest to find.
⏱ Time limits apply. A property-damage claim arising from the collision runs under CPLR 214(4)'s three-year period, measured from the date of the incident. A claim against the person who threw the object runs under CPLR 215, which requires an action for assault or battery to be commenced within one year of that same date. If anyone turns out to have been injured, a personal-injury action would run under CPLR 214(5) instead. Which of these applies to you depends on facts this page does not have, and none of them should be calculated from a page. Have a New York attorney check the dates against your own record now.
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in New York
- File or look up a case through the New York State Unified Court System.
- Get free civil legal help from LawHelpNY.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a New York driver automatically at fault for a collision caused by something thrown at the car?
Not automatically. Fault is decided by whether the driver acted reasonably in the circumstances, and New York courts recognize a doctrine that judges a driver's response to a sudden, unforeseen emergency not of the driver's own making by what was reasonable under those conditions. The doctrine is judge-made and fact-specific; it is an argument the driver has to establish, not an automatic excuse. Fault can also be apportioned among several people, including whoever created the emergency.
How long do I have to sue the person who threw an object at my car in New York?
CPLR 215 requires that an action to recover damages for assault, battery, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, libel or slander be commenced within one year. Throwing an object at a person is an intentional tort, so that one-year period — not the three-year negligence period — is the one to watch, and it runs from the date of the incident. CPLR 215(8) provides that where a criminal action has been commenced against the same defendant over the same event, the plaintiff has at least one year from the termination of that criminal action.
If I was partly at fault for a collision in New York, can I still recover for my vehicle damage?
Yes. CPLR 1411(a) provides that culpable conduct attributable to the claimant, including contributory negligence or assumption of risk, does not bar recovery in an action for personal injury, injury to property or wrongful death, and that damages are diminished in proportion to that conduct. Responsibility can also be apportioned among several people, so a driver's own share reduces what is recovered rather than ending the claim.