My dentist burned my lip and I don't know yet whether it will scar — what should I be doing now?
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced New York attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed February 26, 2024
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
My dentist burnt my outer lip. I'm not sure if there will be scarring.
Attorney Answer
Two things matter right now, and they pull in opposite directions. Medically, you cannot yet know what the lip will look like in six months. Legally, the clock on a dental claim in New York is shorter than most people assume and it does not wait for the outcome to become clear. The way to hold both is to document the injury carefully from today forward and to get the deadline fixed by a New York attorney early, rather than after the scar has settled.
Dental treatment is not governed by the ordinary three-year rule. CPLR 214-a covers it by its own terms:
An action for medical, dental or podiatric malpractice must be commenced within two years and six months of the act, omission or failure complained of or last treatment where there is continuous treatment for the same illness, injury or condition which gave rise to the said act, omission or failure
Two things in that sentence do real work. The period is two years and six months, not three years. And the starting point is not always the appointment where something went wrong: where there is continuous treatment for the same condition, the period runs from the last treatment in that course. If the same dentist went on treating you for the burn or for the work that caused it, that can matter a great deal — and it is not something to judge for yourself, because the statute also says that a visit you request purely to find out the state of your own condition does not count as continuing treatment.
CPLR 208 can extend a limitation period for a person who was under a disability, such as infancy, when the claim accrued, and it contains its own outside limits for a malpractice claim. If the patient here is a child, that is a conversation to have with an attorney rather than an assumption to make.
As for what a claim of this kind actually requires: it is not enough that an injury happened during treatment. A dental malpractice claim rests on showing that the care departed from accepted dental practice and that the departure caused the injury, and proof of both ordinarily comes from a qualified professional rather than from the patient's account. That requirement comes from long-settled practice rather than from a statute, so it is described here in general terms.
Scarring is a real element of damages and it is proved with evidence rather than adjectives — dated photographs taken at intervals under consistent light, the treating records describing the burn and its care, and a professional opinion on permanence once enough time has passed. Nothing about a modest injury prevents a claim; and if it is later argued that something you did or did not do contributed to the outcome, that would not by itself bar you. CPLR 1411(a) provides that a claimant's culpable conduct does not bar recovery, and that "The amount of damages otherwise recoverable shall be diminished in the proportion which the culpable conduct attributable to the claimant or decedent bears to the culpable conduct which caused the damages".
What you can do
1. Photograph the lip today, and keep photographing it at regular intervals in similar light — the sequence is the evidence a later opinion is built on.
2. Get it looked at by a doctor or another dentist and have the burn described, measured and dated in a record.
3. Request your complete dental records and the chart notes for the visit, in writing.
4. Write down what you remember about the appointment while it is fresh: what instrument or material was involved, what was said at the time, and what you were told afterward.
5. Keep every bill, receipt and message about follow-up care.
6. Ask a New York attorney early which date your period runs from, especially if the same dentist has continued to treat you.
⏱ Time limits apply. A dental malpractice claim falls under CPLR 214-a, which requires the action to be commenced within two years and six months of the act, omission or failure complained of, or of the last treatment where there is continuous treatment for the same condition. CPLR 208 may extend that period where the patient was under a disability when the claim accrued. Which date your own period runs from depends on your treatment history, so have a New York attorney fix it — this page does not calculate dates, and the period does not wait for the scarring question to be answered.
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in New York
- File or look up a case through the New York State Unified Court System.
- Get free civil legal help from LawHelpNY.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is dental work covered by the medical malpractice deadline in New York?
Yes. CPLR 214-a applies by its own words to "medical, dental or podiatric malpractice," so a claim about dental treatment runs on two years and six months rather than on the three-year period that covers ordinary personal-injury claims. Assuming the longer period is a common and costly mistake, which is why the starting date is worth confirming with a New York attorney early.
Does the clock start at the appointment where the injury happened?
Not necessarily. CPLR 214-a measures the period from the act, omission or failure complained of, or from the last treatment where there is continuous treatment for the same illness, injury or condition. If the same provider kept treating the same problem, the later date can be the one that counts. The statute also says that a visit made at the patient's own request purely to check the state of the condition does not count as continuing treatment, so this is a question for an attorney rather than for arithmetic at home.
Should I wait to see whether the injury scars before doing anything?
Documenting and waiting are not the same thing. The extent of scarring is genuinely a question of time and is proved with dated photographs and, eventually, a professional opinion on permanence. The limitation period, however, does not pause while that plays out. The practical order is to build the record now — photographs, records, a written account of the appointment — and to have the deadline confirmed early, so that the medical picture can develop without the legal one closing.