1LAW Logo

Rear-ended while switching car insurance in New York: who pays your first-party benefits, and how fast

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced New York attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed November 22, 2021

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

Hi. I was recently in a car accident and I got rear-ended. The person who caused the accident was responsible and claimed responsibility for the accident. The problem is that I was in the process of switching car insurance when the accident occurred. What can I do to get compensation for the accident?

Attorney Answer

Being between policies changes who pays your own first-party benefits — it does not change who is responsible for the collision. Fault is conceded here, so the work is on the insurance side: identifying which carrier owes first-party benefits when a policy was in transition, and making the claim in time for the thirty-day payment rule to bite.

Start with the driving rule the other driver broke. Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129(a) states it plainly: "The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicles and the traffic upon and the condition of the highway." New York courts also apply a long-settled evidentiary rule about rear-end collisions that places the burden on the following driver to come forward with a non-negligent explanation. That rule is judge-made rather than statutory, and a New York attorney can tell you how it is applied to facts like yours.

New York's no-fault system pays certain losses regardless of who was at fault, through first-party benefits, and the statute puts a clock on the payer rather than on you. Insurance Law § 5106(a) provides: "Payments of first party benefits and additional first party benefits shall be made as the loss is incurred. Such benefits are overdue if not paid within thirty days after the claimant supplies proof of the fact and amount of loss sustained." That thirty days runs from your proof of loss, which is why getting a complete claim and complete bills in front of the right carrier early is worth more than arguing about the accident.

Which carrier is the right one is exactly what a lapse or an overlap between policies puts in issue. When a new policy took effect, when the old one ended, whether there was a gap at the moment of the collision, and whose vehicle you were in all bear on it, and the answer may not be your own carrier at all. Gather the declarations pages for both policies, the effective dates, the cancellation or non-renewal notice and the payment records, because that paperwork will decide the question faster than any conversation will.

Whether you were injured, and what you would have to show to bring a claim against the other driver for an injury, are questions this page does not answer for you — your message does not say whether you were hurt, and New York applies further rules to a personal-injury claim arising out of the use of a motor vehicle that turn on facts and on when a lawsuit is filed. Take those to a New York attorney, and do it before assuming that a conceded liability admission means the compensation question is settled.

What you can do

1. Collect the declarations pages and effective dates for both the old and the new policy, plus any cancellation notice and proof of payment.

2. Give written notice of the claim to every carrier that could conceivably be responsible, rather than picking one and waiting.

3. Submit complete proof of the fact and amount of each loss — bills, records, wage documentation — and keep the date you submitted it, because the thirty-day rule runs from that proof.

4. Get the police accident report and any written statement in which the other driver accepted responsibility.

5. Photograph the damage to both vehicles before repair, including the alignment of the impact.

6. If you were treated at all, keep every record and every bill, even for visits you consider minor.

7. Have a New York attorney review the coverage question and the injury question together; they interact, and the coverage answer is time-sensitive.

⏱ Time limits apply. CPLR 214 sets three years for "an action to recover damages for a personal injury except as provided in sections 214-b, 214-c, 214-i and 215," and three years for an action to recover damages for an injury to property, measured from the date of the collision. No-fault first-party benefits run on their own much shorter claim and proof deadlines, and a claim involving a public corporation runs on the far shorter periods of General Municipal Law §§ 50-e(1)(a) and 50-i(1)(c). Which deadlines are yours depends on your facts, and no date is calculated here. Have a New York attorney confirm them promptly.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in New York

Frequently Asked Questions

When are New York no-fault benefits overdue?

Insurance Law § 5106(a) provides that payments of first party benefits and additional first party benefits shall be made as the loss is incurred, and that such benefits are overdue if not paid within thirty days after the claimant supplies proof of the fact and amount of loss sustained. The thirty days therefore runs from the claimant's proof, not from the date of the accident, which makes the date complete bills and records are submitted worth recording. If benefits go unpaid past that point, a New York attorney can advise on what follows.

What does New York law say about a driver who rear-ends another vehicle?

Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129(a) provides that the driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicles and the traffic upon and the condition of the highway. That is the statutory duty. New York courts additionally apply a long-settled evidentiary rule in rear-end cases that requires the following driver to come forward with a non-negligent explanation for the collision; because that rule is judge-made rather than statutory, its scope in a particular case is a question for a New York attorney.

Does being between insurance policies mean nobody pays my accident-related bills?

Not necessarily. Which carrier owes first-party benefits depends on the effective dates of the policies involved, on whose vehicle the person was in, and on whether a gap actually existed at the moment of the collision — and there are routes in New York for a person who genuinely has no available coverage. The paperwork settles it: declarations pages, effective dates, cancellation or non-renewal notices and payment records. Because the benefit clocks are short, this is a question to put to a New York attorney early rather than after the bills accumulate.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices