1LAW Logo

Suing the State of New York over a tire in the road runs through the Court of Claims — and a ninety-day clock

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced New York attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed April 14, 2023

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I got in an accident due to a tire on the highway. Is there a way I can sue the State?

Attorney Answer

Yes, the State of New York can be sued — but not in the court and not on the schedule most people expect. A claim against the State goes to the Court of Claims under the Court of Claims Act, and the first deadline is ninety days, not three years. Identifying who owned and maintained that stretch of highway is therefore the first question, because it decides the court, the statute and the clock.

Court of Claims Act § 10 sets the time to bring a claim against the State, and it sets different periods for different kinds of claim, which is why a flat "ninety days" is not a safe answer. The subdivision that governs a claim for damages for injuries to property or for personal injuries caused by the negligence or unintentional tort of a state officer or employee is subdivision 3: the claim must be filed with the court and served on the Attorney General within ninety days after the claim accrues, unless within that same ninety days a written notice of intention to file a claim is served on the Attorney General, in which case the claim itself may be filed and served within two years after accrual. A wrongful-death claim runs under a different subdivision, whose ninety days is measured from the appointment of the decedent's executor or administrator. Court of Claims Act § 11 governs the mechanics — filing with the clerk of the court, service on the Attorney General, and what the claim must state, including when and where the claim arose, its nature and the items of damage.

A missed deadline is not automatically the end. Section 10 also gives the Court of Claims discretion to permit a late claim, and the statute lists what the court weighs — among them whether the delay was excusable, whether the State had notice of the essential facts and an opportunity to investigate, whether the claim appears meritorious, and whether the State was substantially prejudiced.

If the road turns out not to be a state road, the analysis changes entirely. A city, county, town, school district or transit authority is a public corporation, not the State, and those defendants run under the General Municipal Law: § 50-e(1)(a) requires that "the notice of claim shall comply with and be served in accordance with the provisions of this section within ninety days after the claim arises; except that in wrongful death actions, the ninety days shall run from the appointment of a representative of the decedent's estate," and § 50-i(1)(c) requires that "the action or special proceeding shall be commenced within one year and ninety days after the happening of the event upon which the claim is based; except that wrongful death actions shall be commenced within two years after the happening of the death." Section 50-e(5) lets a court extend the notice period, weighing among other things whether the public corporation acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts in time. And if the tire came off a private vehicle or a trucking company's trailer, that defendant is an ordinary defendant under the three-year period of CPLR 214.

Your message does not say whether anyone was injured. Whether additional New York motor-vehicle rules affect an injury claim is a question for a New York attorney on your facts.

What you can do

1. Establish who owns and maintains that stretch of road — an interstate or state route, a county road, a city street or a bridge and tunnel authority each lead to a different defendant and a different clock.

2. Write down the date, time, direction of travel and location marker of the accident while you still remember them; accrual dates decide these deadlines.

3. Preserve the tire or debris if you still have it, and every photograph, dashcam file and repair estimate.

4. Request the police accident report and any highway-agency incident or maintenance record for that location and date.

5. Keep any evidence that the hazard had been there long enough to be noticed.

6. Speak with a New York attorney immediately rather than after you gather everything, because the shortest clock here is ninety days and it may already be running.

⏱ Time limits apply. Court of Claims Act §§ 10 and 11 govern a claim against the State and start at ninety days from accrual for a negligence claim of this kind; General Municipal Law §§ 50-e(1)(a) and 50-i(1)(c) govern a public corporation at ninety days and one year and ninety days; CPLR 214 gives three years against a private defendant. Which one is yours depends on facts this page does not have, and no date is calculated here. Have a New York attorney identify the defendant and confirm your deadline right away.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in New York

Frequently Asked Questions

Is suing the State of New York different from suing another driver?

Yes, in three ways that matter. The case is brought in the Court of Claims rather than in Supreme Court; the governing statute is the Court of Claims Act rather than the CPLR limitation periods alone; and the first deadline is far shorter. For a claim for injuries to property or personal injuries caused by the negligence of a state officer or employee, Court of Claims Act § 10(3) requires the claim to be filed and served on the Attorney General within ninety days after accrual, unless a written notice of intention is served within that same ninety days, which extends the time to file the claim to two years. Section 11 sets how and where the claim is filed and served and what it must say.

What if the road belongs to a city or a county instead of the State?

Then it is a public corporation and the General Municipal Law applies instead of the Court of Claims Act. General Municipal Law § 50-e(1)(a) requires a notice of claim within ninety days after the claim arises, and § 50-i(1)(c) requires the action to be commenced within one year and ninety days after the event. Both run together, so a claimant who serves the notice and then waits the ordinary three years is out of time. Citing the General Municipal Law against the State itself is a mismatch — it names the wrong statute and the wrong court.

Have I lost the claim if the ninety days has already passed?

Not necessarily. Court of Claims Act § 10 allows the court, in its discretion, to permit a late claim, and the statute lists the factors it considers — whether the delay was excusable, whether the State had notice of the essential facts and a chance to investigate, whether the claim appears meritorious, whether the State was substantially prejudiced and whether another remedy exists. Against a public corporation, General Municipal Law § 50-e(5) gives a court a comparable power to extend the time to serve a notice of claim. Neither is automatic, and both are decided by a judge, so a late claimant should get advice promptly rather than assume the door is shut.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices