1LAW Logo

Your own insurer refuses to pay the other driver's damage in New York: the two fights that opens

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced New York attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed November 14, 2023

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I got into an auto accident in July. My insurance company said they won't cover her damages, so now they are saying I owe $10,000 for her damages, but I truly believe the accident wasn't my fault.

Attorney Answer

Two separate fights just opened, and they have different opponents. One is whether you owe the other driver anything at all, which depends on fault and on proof. The other is whether your own policy has to answer for it, which depends entirely on the reason your insurer gave for refusing — and that reason is the first thing to get in writing.

Take the coverage question first, because it is the one with a deadline you cannot see. Insurance Law § 3420 prescribes provisions that a liability policy issued or delivered in New York must contain, and several of them protect a policyholder in exactly this position. Under § 3420(a)(4), a failure to give a notice the policy requires within the time the policy prescribes does not invalidate a claim if it is shown that it was not reasonably possible to give notice in time and that notice was given as soon as was reasonably possible after that. Under § 3420(a)(5), late notice does not invalidate a claim by the insured, an injured person or another claimant unless the failure to provide timely notice has prejudiced the insurer. And § 3420(c) puts the burden on the insurer: it must prove any failure to cooperate, and must prove prejudice from late notice where the notice came within two years of the time the policy required — and its rights are not deemed prejudiced unless the delay materially impaired its ability to investigate or defend. None of that guarantees coverage. It does mean a disclaimer is a position an insurer has to defend, not a decision that ends the discussion.

One limit worth knowing: § 3420(d)(2), which requires written notice of a disclaimer as soon as is reasonably possible, is written for a disclaimer of coverage for death or bodily injury arising out of an accident in New York. A refusal aimed only at the other driver's vehicle damage sits outside that requirement, which makes getting the insurer's reasons in writing more important, not less.

The second fight is fault, and the ten thousand dollars is not owed simply because someone has named a number. In a claim for vehicle damage, the person seeking payment has to prove the other driver's negligence caused it, and New York apportions responsibility rather than assigning it whole. CPLR 1411(a) provides: "Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, in any action to recover damages for personal injury, injury to property, or wrongful death, the culpable conduct attributable to the claimant or to the decedent, including contributory negligence or assumption of risk, shall not bar recovery." Damages are then diminished in proportion to that conduct, so if the other driver was partly responsible, a recovery against you is reduced by her share.

What you should not do is let the demand sit. If coverage stays denied and the other driver sues, a judgment can be entered against you personally — and the moment to challenge both the disclaimer and the fault claim is before that happens.

What you can do

1. Ask your insurer, in writing, for the disclaimer in writing: the exact policy provision relied on and the facts it says trigger it. A verbal refusal is not a coverage position you can test.

2. Get a complete copy of your policy, including the declarations page and any endorsements in force on the date of the accident.

3. Write down when and how you first reported the accident, and to whom — under § 3420(a)(4) and (5), that timeline is often the whole coverage question.

4. Preserve your own evidence of fault: photographs, the police report number, and the names of any witnesses.

5. Send any letter, demand or court paper you receive to your insurer immediately, and keep proof that you sent it.

6. Have a New York attorney review the disclaimer letter and the policy together; a coverage question and a liability question are often argued by different lawyers.

⏱ Time limits apply. A claim against you for damage to the other vehicle runs under CPLR 214(4), the three-year period for an action to recover damages for an injury to property, measured from the date of the accident. Your policy carries separate contractual deadlines for notice and for any suit against your own insurer, found in the policy rather than in a statute; § 3420(c) itself treats notice given more than two years after the policy required it differently from notice given within that window. Which of these controls depends on facts this page does not have. Have a New York attorney review the disclaimer and the policy against the accident date now.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in New York

Frequently Asked Questions

Can my insurance company refuse to cover a claim in New York because I reported the accident late?

Not automatically. Insurance Law § 3420(a)(4) provides that failure to give a required notice within the time the policy prescribes does not invalidate a claim where it was not reasonably possible to give notice in time and notice was given as soon as was reasonably possible after that. Section 3420(a)(5) goes further: late notice does not invalidate the claim unless the failure has prejudiced the insurer, and § 3420(c) places the burden of proving prejudice on the insurer where notice came within two years of the time the policy required. An insurer's rights are not deemed prejudiced unless its ability to investigate or defend was materially impaired.

If my insurer denies coverage, am I personally responsible for the other driver's damage in New York?

You are exposed to that possibility, which is why the denial should be tested rather than accepted. A liability insurer's promise to pay and defend runs through the policy; if the insurer maintains a disclaimer, the other driver can pursue the claim against you personally and, if successful, obtain a judgment that can be enforced. Whether the disclaimer is valid is a separate question from whether you were at fault, and Insurance Law § 3420 places several burdens on the insurer in that dispute. Both questions should be reviewed by a New York attorney.

Does believing the accident was not my fault matter if a claim has been made in New York?

Yes, because fault has to be proved, not asserted. In an action for vehicle damage the claimant must establish that the other driver's negligence caused the loss, and New York apportions responsibility: CPLR 1411(a) provides that a claimant's culpable conduct does not bar recovery but diminishes damages in proportion to that conduct. So a shared-fault finding reduces what is owed rather than deciding the case outright.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices