1LAW Logo

A Test Result No One Told You About: When a Delayed Diagnosis Can Be Malpractice in Pennsylvania

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Pennsylvania attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed January 2023

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I'm wondering whether this would be worth pursuing. My wife had an MRI and then a doctor's appointment. The MRI results took about two months, and we were told there were no findings. We later found out that the MRI had been sent for a second opinion without our knowledge, and that the second reading found a mass on her thyroid, but no one called to tell us. My wife only found it because she was looking through her chart online, where it says it needs follow-up. She only saw this several months after the MRI, and now we are waiting for a biopsy. It seems like a bad case of medical malpractice.

Attorney Answer

It may be, but the biopsy decides most of it. A provider that learns of an abnormal result and does not tell the patient can be negligent, but a malpractice claim also needs harm that the failure caused. If the mass is benign, or the months of delay did not change your wife's diagnosis or treatment, there is likely nothing to recover, even if the failure to call was careless. If it is malignant and the delay made her outlook or her treatment worse, a claim may exist. The claim would be hers, it needs a medical expert's support, and the deadline is two years.

A result no one passed on. Pennsylvania courts have upheld a malpractice verdict on facts like these. In Sutch v. Roxborough Memorial Hospital, 151 A.3d 241 (Pa. Super. 2016), a physician received a radiologist's reports of a suspicious nodule and never told the patient, who learned much later of advanced cancer; the Superior Court upheld the verdict, which rested on expert testimony about what the physician should have done. That is not a rule that every failure to pass on a result is malpractice. It shows the kind of claim that can succeed with a medical expert's support.

Harm and cause. Where a provider's negligence increased the risk of a harm that then actually happened, Pennsylvania lets the jury decide whether that increased risk was a substantial factor in causing it; the patient does not have to prove that proper care would certainly have prevented it. That is the rule of Hamil v. Bashline, 481 Pa. 256, 392 A.2d 1280 (1978). The harm has to have happened, which is why the biopsy result comes first.

A medical expert, and the deadline. A malpractice claim needs a medical expert's support before it can go forward. The deadline is 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524:

The following actions and proceedings must be commenced within two years:
(2) An action to recover damages for injuries to the person or for the death of an individual caused by the wrongful act or neglect or unlawful violence or negligence of another.

When the two years start running for an injury that was not discovered right away is a question a lawyer should answer for your wife's dates.

What you can do

1. Put your wife's health first: get the biopsy and any follow-up it calls for without delay.

2. Download or print the chart entries now: the MRI report, the second reading, the follow-up note and their dates, and any portal messages.

3. Write down a timeline of the appointments and calls, with dates, while you both remember them.

4. Talk to a Pennsylvania medical malpractice lawyer once the biopsy result is known, or sooner if the result is concerning.

5. Even if you are handling this yourself, you would be best served by a brief phone consultation with a local Pennsylvania attorney before you act. Most lawyers offer a short initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts — and on how your court actually handles this — is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. A malpractice lawsuit must be filed within two years under 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524(2). A lawyer can tell you when that period starts in your wife's situation.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Sutch v. Roxborough Memorial Hospital, 151 A.3d 241 (Pa. Super. 2016) — Superior Court of Pennsylvania
    A verdict was upheld where a physician received reports of a suspicious nodule and never told the patient.
  • Hamil v. Bashline, 481 Pa. 256, 392 A.2d 1280 (1978) — Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    Once negligence increased the risk of a harm that in fact occurred, the jury decides whether it was a substantial factor.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in Pennsylvania

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it malpractice if a doctor doesn't tell you about an abnormal test result in Pennsylvania?

It can be. In Sutch v. Roxborough Memorial Hospital, 151 A.3d 241 (Pa. Super. 2016), a verdict was upheld where a physician received reports of a suspicious nodule and never told the patient. A claim needs a medical expert's support and harm caused by the failure.

What if the delay in telling me didn't change anything?

Then there is likely no compensable harm. Under Hamil v. Bashline, 481 Pa. 256, 392 A.2d 1280 (1978), a patient may show that negligence increased the risk of a harm, but the harm must actually have occurred.

How long do I have to file a medical malpractice claim in Pennsylvania?

Two years under 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524(2). A lawyer can tell you when that period starts for an injury that was not discovered right away.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices