1LAW Logo

Burned When a Disposable Cup's Lid Came Off: Product-Defect Claims in Pennsylvania

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Pennsylvania attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed January 10, 2023

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I was using a disposable coffee cup, and when I went to drink from it, the lid slid right off. I then checked the rest of the cups in the package, and the lids clearly do not fit the cups properly. I was burned as a result.

Attorney Answer

You may have a product claim against the company that made or sold the cups, if the lids and cups in that package do not fit together as made. Pennsylvania lets a person hurt by a product sold in a defective condition recover from its maker or seller, and the leftover cups and lids are your best evidence that the problem was in the product, not in how one lid was put on. Keep the package and everything in it. What a claim is worth depends mostly on how serious the burn was.

When a product is defective. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held in Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 628 Pa. 296, 104 A.3d 328 (2014) that an injured person may prove a product was in a defective condition in either of two ways: by showing it was more dangerous than an ordinary consumer would expect, or by showing that its risks outweighed its usefulness. Whether a product was defective is ordinarily a question for the jury. Lids that do not stay on the cups they are sold with are the kind of thing the first test is about; whether the problem was in the design or in that batch is for the evidence to show, and a claim does not have to choose at the start.

What the company would argue. A maker may say the injury came from how the product was used, not from a defect. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held in Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc., 618 Pa. 228, 55 A.3d 1088 (2012) that a defense based on the injured person's highly reckless conduct must be raised and proved by the company, and defeats the claim only if that conduct was the sole or superseding cause of the injury. That is why the rest of the package matters: lids that do not fit cups no one has used yet answer the argument that you put yours on wrong.

The deadline. 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524:

The following actions and proceedings must be commenced within two years:
(2) An action to recover damages for injuries to the person or for the death of an individual caused by the wrongful act or neglect or unlawful violence or negligence of another.

What you can do

1. Keep the package, every remaining cup and lid, and the receipt if you have it. Do not throw them away or use them up testing them.

2. Get the burn treated, keep the records, and photograph it as it heals.

3. Write down where and when you bought the package, and what was in the cup.

4. Do not send the product to the company before talking to a lawyer; you may need it as evidence.

5. Even if you are handling this yourself, you would be best served by a brief phone consultation with a local Pennsylvania attorney before you act. Most lawyers offer a short initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts — and on how your court actually handles this — is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. A lawsuit for an injury must be filed within two years under 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524(2). A lawyer can tell you how it applies to your situation.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 628 Pa. 296, 104 A.3d 328 (2014) — Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    A plaintiff may prove a product was in a defective condition by either the consumer-expectations test or the risk-utility test; defect is ordinarily a jury question.
  • Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc., 618 Pa. 228, 55 A.3d 1088 (2012) — Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    Highly reckless conduct is an affirmative defense the manufacturer must plead and prove, and it defeats the claim only if it was the sole or superseding cause.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in Pennsylvania

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I bring a claim if a defective product burned me in Pennsylvania?

Yes, if the product was in a defective condition and the defect caused the injury. Under Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 628 Pa. 296, 104 A.3d 328 (2014), a person may prove a defective condition by showing the product was more dangerous than an ordinary consumer would expect, or that its risks outweighed its usefulness.

What defenses can a manufacturer raise in a Pennsylvania product case?

A manufacturer may argue that the injured person's highly reckless conduct caused the injury, but under Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc., 618 Pa. 228, 55 A.3d 1088 (2012) it must raise and prove that defense, and it defeats the claim only if the conduct was the sole or superseding cause.

How long do I have to sue for a product injury in Pennsylvania?

Two years under 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524(2), which covers an action to recover damages for injuries to the person caused by the wrongful act or neglect or negligence of another.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices