Charging a Tenant for Minor Damage to Window Blinds
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Utah attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Managing Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed January 1, 2026
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
Being charged 100$ per minor damaged faux wood binds.
Attorney Answer
A landlord may only deduct for damage beyond normal wear and tear, and must give you a written, itemized explanation of any deduction — so a flat $100-per-blind charge, with no itemization or for what is really ordinary wear, is not automatically valid.
Under Utah Code § 57-17-3, when a tenancy ends a landlord may apply the deposit only toward unpaid rent, damage beyond reasonable wear and tear, other costs or fees provided for in the rental agreement, or cleaning. No later than 30 days after the renter vacates and returns possession, the landlord must deliver the refund and, for any deduction, a written notice itemizing and explaining the reason for each one.
"Beyond reasonable wear and tear" is the phrase that matters for blinds. Minor fading, small bends, and gradual aging from ordinary daily use are generally the landlord's cost of doing business; only damage beyond that, from misuse or neglect, is fair game for a deduction. Separately, whether $100 per blind is even a reasonable repair or replacement cost — as opposed to an inflated flat fee — is its own question worth pushing on, and a landlord should be able to back the figure with an invoice or quote.
If the landlord blows the 30-day deadline, there is one more step you have to take before the statutory remedy is available to you. Under Utah Code § 57-17-3(3) you must serve the landlord with a written notice titled TENANT'S NOTICE TO PROVIDE DEPOSIT DISPOSITION, stating the parties to the rental agreement, the day you vacated, that the landlord failed to comply, and the address where the landlord can send what is owed; the Utah courts publish a fillable form for it. It has to be served one of the four ways § 57-17-3(4) allows: personally on the owner or the owner's agent, by leaving it with a responsible person at the owner's address, by taping it to the owner's door, or by certified mail. Section 57-17-3(5) then gives the landlord five business days to comply. Only if the landlord still does not does Utah Code § 57-17-5(1) let you recover the full deposit, the full amount of any prepaid rent, and a $100 civil penalty as of publication, with costs and attorney fees to the prevailing party where the court finds the opposing party acted in bad faith. Section 57-17-5(3) is blunt about the sequence: a renter who fails to serve that notice is not entitled to relief under the section. Utah does not provide a double-damages remedy for withheld deposits.
What you can do
1. Request in writing a specific itemized explanation for the blinds charge, including how the $100-per-blind figure was calculated and whether it reflects repair or full replacement. 2. Ask for the invoice, quote, or receipt supporting the amount, plus any move-in and move-out photos the landlord is relying on. 3. Gather your own photos and your move-in condition checklist, if you completed one. 4. Check the calendar: if more than 30 days have passed since you vacated and returned possession with no written itemized statement, serve the landlord with the TENANT'S NOTICE TO PROVIDE DEPOSIT DISPOSITION described above and keep proof of how and when you served it — under Utah Code § 57-17-5(3) you cannot get the statutory deposit remedy without having served it. 5. Send a written dispute explaining why the condition is ordinary wear and tear, request refund of the disputed amount, and if that fails consider small claims court, which is built for disputes this size.
Time limits: Utah requires a landlord to return the deposit or deliver the written itemized deduction notice within 30 days after the renter vacates and returns possession. How that deadline applies to your move-out, and what you can still claim, depends on your specific dates and facts — get an individual case review from a Utah attorney rather than working from a general timeframe.
Cases Cited
Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.
- Bercat Management, LLC v. Joseph Murphy and Taylor Murphy, Texas Court of Appeals
- Levine v. Kellogg, 153 N.E.3d 663 — Ohio Court of Appeals 2020
- Demettress Burnett v. David Davis and Mari Davis (mem. dec.), Indiana Court of Appeals 2019
- Texan Pearl, LLC v. Victoria Koegel, Joseph W. Koegel, Sarah Evans, and Thomas Evans, Texas Court of Appeals
- Jennifer A. Leipold and Douglas C. Mangels v. Carrie Hubbell Melgarejo, Delaware Court of Common Pleas 2014
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in Utah
- File or look up a case through the Utah State Courts, which serves the state.
- Get free civil legal help from Utah Legal Services.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
- Visit HUD — Housing Discrimination Complaint to report housing discrimination.
- Visit CFPB Consumer Tools to tenant, mortgage, and eviction resources.
Frequently Asked Questions
What counts as "reasonable wear and tear" versus chargeable damage in Utah?
Wear and tear generally covers gradual deterioration from normal use, such as minor fading or light wear marks, while chargeable damage typically involves harm from misuse, accident, or neglect beyond ordinary aging.
What happens if a Utah landlord misses the 30-day deposit deadline?
Missing the 30-day deadline alone does not trigger the statutory remedy. Under Utah Code § 57-17-3(3) the renter must first serve the landlord with a TENANT'S NOTICE TO PROVIDE DEPOSIT DISPOSITION, and § 57-17-3(5) then gives the landlord five business days to comply. If the landlord still does not, § 57-17-5(1) allows the renter to recover the full deposit, the full amount of any prepaid rent, and a $100 civil penalty as of publication, with costs and attorney fees to the prevailing party if the court finds the other side acted in bad faith. Section 57-17-5(3) provides that a renter who fails to serve that notice is not entitled to relief under the section.
Does a landlord have to justify the dollar amount of a deposit deduction?
The itemized notice must explain the reason for each deduction, and a charge that is not supported by an actual repair or replacement cost can be challenged as unreasonable even where some damage genuinely exists.