Whether a 'No Parent-Time' Provision Bars Phone and Video Contact With a Child
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Utah attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Managing Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed January 1, 2026
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
I have a cohabitant abuse protective order against my husband covering me and my children; only our youngest is his. It is not a no-contact order — it is a personal conduct order preventing harassment and intimidation, and an order to stay away from my home, work and schools. It does include a limited carve-out allowing him to attend a shared place of worship subject to a distance restriction, and providing he does not remove our daughter from the building. It says no parent time. My question is whether 'no parent time' means he also cannot call or video call our daughter. I would like him to, but I don't want him to get in trouble.
Attorney Answer
"No parent-time" in your order likely means no in-person visits or exchanges — it doesn't automatically ban phone or video calls, but you should get the order clarified rather than assume.
Utah courts have made clear that a person can't be punished for violating a protective order unless the order's own terms are specific enough to leave no real doubt about what's prohibited. In Bountiful City v. Swenson, 2024 UT App 133, the Utah Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal of a violation charge where a father simply attended his child's medical appointment that the mother also attended — because the order contained no distance or proximity restriction, and its no-contact language addressed communication, which he hadn't attempted. That case involved physical presence rather than remote contact, but the principle it applies is the one that matters here: a protective order is enforced by its actual, specific wording, not by a general sense of what it's "supposed to" mean.
Your order says "no parent time," paired with a personal conduct provision and a stay-away requirement covering your home, work, and the children's schools. "Parent-time" is normally a specific legal term referring to physical, in-person time with a child — not phone or video calls. That reading is consistent with the order's structure, which separately restricts physical proximity and physical locations, suggesting it is primarily managing physical contact and safety rather than communication methods.
That said, this is exactly the kind of ambiguity that leads to accidental violation allegations — and you clearly want to avoid that outcome. Rather than relying on an interpretation, even a reasonable one, ask the court to clarify or modify the order to expressly state whether phone or video contact with your daughter is allowed.
What you can do
1. Re-read your order's exact language on "no parent time" and any definitions section, since the specific wording controls. 2. Don't authorize or encourage phone or video calls yet based on your own interpretation — get it clarified first. 3. File a motion asking the court to clarify or modify the order to expressly address phone and video contact with your daughter. 4. If the court process will take time, ask whether a temporary clarification can be entered in the meantime. 5. Talk to a Utah family law attorney about how to request this clarification without disturbing the protective order's other protections for you and your children.
Cases Cited
Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.
- Bountiful City v. Swenson, 2024 UT App 133, 557 P.3d 1158 — Court of Appeals of Utah 2024
A person cannot be punished for disobeying a protective order unless the order is 'sufficiently specific and definite as to leave no reasonable basis for doubt regarding its meaning'; the Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal of a protective order violation charge where the father merely attended his child's medical appointment that the mother also attended, because the order contained no proximity or distance restriction and its no-contact provision addressed communication, which he did not attempt. - John v. John, 2023 UT App 103, 536 P.3d 1138 — Court of Appeals of Utah 2023
- In re T.H..., 2015 UT App 66 — Court of Appeals of Utah 2015
- D.H. v. State, 2015 UT App 66, 347 P.3d 2 — Court of Appeals of Utah 2015
- D.H. v. State, 2015 UT App 66, 347 P.3d 2 — Court of Appeals of Utah 2015
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in Utah
- File or look up a case through the Utah State Courts, which serves the state.
- Get free civil legal help from Utah Legal Services.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
What makes a Utah protective order enforceable against a specific action?
A protective order can only be enforced for conduct clearly prohibited by its actual terms; Utah courts require the order to be specific enough that a reasonable person would understand what is and isn't allowed.
Does "parent-time" in Utah family law usually mean the same thing as any contact with a child?
No, "parent-time" typically refers to scheduled, in-person time with a child, and is generally treated as distinct from other forms of contact like phone calls or video chats unless an order specifically addresses those.
Can a Utah protective order be modified after it's entered?
Yes, either party can generally ask the court to modify or clarify a protective order's terms, and courts can adjust provisions like contact terms when circumstances change or the wording needs clarifying.