Claim Process After Being Rear-Ended by a Federal Agent
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed November 21, 2024
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
I was rear-ended by a government ATF agent on the freeway. How should I approach the situation?
Attorney Answer
If the agent was on duty, your claim is against the United States, and it does not start in court. It starts with a written claim presented to the federal agency, and that step is mandatory — skipping it ends the case regardless of how clear the fault is. California's own government-claim rules do not apply here, and confusing the two is the most common way these claims are lost.
On fault, nothing changes because of who was driving. Cal. Veh. Code § 21703 provides: "The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicle and the traffic upon, and the condition of, the roadway." A federal agent driving on a freeway is held to the same standard as anyone else.
The process is the difficult part. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a), a claim against the United States for money damages caused by the negligence of a federal employee acting within the scope of employment may not be brought in court until the claim has first been presented to the appropriate federal agency and the agency has finally denied it in writing. The presentment is made on Standard Form 95. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b), there are two years from accrual to present that claim to the agency. Those are not formalities that can be cured later.
Whether this is a federal claim at all turns on scope. If the agent was on duty in a government vehicle when the collision happened, the Federal Tort Claims Act route is the one. If the agent was off duty in a personal vehicle, this is an ordinary California claim against a driver, running on California's ordinary periods, and it would be handled through that driver's own insurance. A page cannot tell which you have. The traffic collision report, the vehicle's registration and the agency's own determination are what settle it, and the answer changes both the deadline and where the claim goes.
One thing to be clear about: Cal. Gov't Code § 911.2(a), the six-month deadline for presenting a claim to a California public entity, governs claims against California cities, counties, districts and the state. It does not apply to a claim against a federal agency. If you were told to file a claim with a California entity here, that advice is aimed at the wrong government.
What you can do
1. Request the traffic collision report from the agency that responded, and note whether the report records the vehicle as a government vehicle and the agent as on duty.
2. Get medical evaluation now if you were hurt at all, and keep every record and bill. Delayed onset is common after a rear-end impact, and gaps in treatment are read against injury claims.
3. Report the collision to your own insurer. Most policies require it, and your own coverages may matter while a federal claim is pending, which can take many months.
4. Photograph both vehicles before any repair, and preserve any dashcam footage immediately.
5. Talk to a local attorney who handles Federal Tort Claims Act matters, and do it soon. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b) there are two years from accrual to present the administrative claim to the agency, and the presentment itself — the form, the recipient agency, and what the claim has to state — is where these cases are lost.
6. Do not sign a release, accept a payment, or give a recorded statement to anyone about the collision before that review.
Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts with someone who practices in your area is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.
⏱ Time limits apply. For a claim against the United States, 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b) allows two years from accrual to present the administrative claim to the federal agency, and 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a) bars a lawsuit until that claim has been presented and finally denied in writing. If it turns out this is not a federal claim, California's periods govern instead — Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1's two years for injury or death and Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 338(c)(1)'s three years for vehicle damage. Which set applies, and where each stands, depends on facts a page cannot see. Have a local attorney review this individually and promptly rather than counting from the calendar yourself.
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in California
- File or look up a case through the California Courts.
- Get free civil legal help from LawHelpCA.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do you make a claim after a crash with a federal employee driving on duty?
Through the Federal Tort Claims Act, and administratively first. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a), an action for money damages against the United States for a federal employee's negligence within the scope of employment may not be brought until the claim has been presented to the appropriate federal agency and finally denied in writing. The claim is presented on Standard Form 95, and 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b) allows two years from accrual to present it.
Does California's six-month government claim deadline apply to a federal agency?
No. Cal. Gov't Code § 911.2(a) requires a claim relating to death or injury to person or personal property to be presented to a California public entity within six months of accrual, and it governs claims against California cities, counties, districts and the state. Claims against a federal agency run on the Federal Tort Claims Act instead, under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2675(a) and 2401(b).
Does it matter whether a government employee was on duty at the time of a crash?
It decides which route the claim takes. If the employee was acting within the scope of federal employment, the claim proceeds against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, with its mandatory administrative presentment. If the employee was off duty in a personal vehicle, it is an ordinary claim against that driver on the state's ordinary periods — in California, Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 for injury and § 338(c)(1) for vehicle damage.