1LAW Logo

Claiming on Your Driver's Policy Means Naming the Driver

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed February 15, 2021

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I need help. I was a passenger in a single-car wreck with my boyfriend. His car insurance is supposed to pay for my injuries, but the process is taking forever. If I were to sue the company, would I be suing my boyfriend?

Attorney Answer

Yes — a lawsuit would name your boyfriend, not the insurance company. That sounds worse than it usually is in practice. In California you generally pursue the person whose driving caused the harm; his liability insurer is the one that investigates, hires and pays the defense lawyer, and pays a settlement or judgment up to the policy limits. His name is on the paperwork because the claim is about his driving. The money still comes from the policy he bought for exactly this.

The rule behind the claim is Civil Code § 1714(a): "Everyone is responsible, not only for the result of his or her willful acts, but also for an injury occasioned to another by his or her want of ordinary care or skill in the management of his or her property or person, except so far as the latter has, willfully or by want of ordinary care, brought the injury upon himself or herself." In a single-vehicle crash the person whose care is in question is almost always the driver. A passenger is rarely part of that inquiry.

Now the delay, which is the part you can actually push on. California's Fair Claims Settlement Practices regulations put clocks on an insurer. Under 10 California Code of Regulations § 2695.7(b), "Upon receiving proof of claim, every insurer, except as specified in subsection 2695.7(b)(4) below, shall immediately, but in no event more than forty (40) calendar days later, accept or deny the claim, in whole or in part." If it needs longer, § 2695.7(c)(1) requires written notice of that need inside the same window, and then a further written notice every thirty calendar days until it decides. Under § 2695.5(b) the insurer has fifteen calendar days to give a complete response to a communication from a claimant that reasonably suggests a response is expected. And under § 2695.7(h), once it accepts a claim — and, where one is necessary, receives a properly executed release — it has thirty calendar days to tender payment.

Those clocks run from proof of claim, not from the date of the crash. If the adjuster is still waiting on records, the forty days may not have started. That is worth checking before you conclude the file is being sat on.

What you can do

1. Send the adjuster a short, dated written request for the status of the claim and for a list of anything they are still missing, and keep a copy of what you sent.

2. Get your medical records and bills to the adjuster, since the forty-day clock in § 2695.7(b) runs from proof of claim.

3. Keep every letter, email and voicemail from the insurer, with dates — that record is what makes a delay complaint concrete.

4. If the file stays stalled, file a complaint with the California Department of Insurance. Under 10 C.C.R. § 2695.5(a) the insurer must give the Department a complete written response within twenty-one calendar days of its inquiry.

5. Ask a local lawyer to read any release before you sign it, and to tell you what naming your boyfriend as a defendant would and would not mean for him personally.

6. Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts with a local attorney is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. A claim for injury in California runs on Code of Civil Procedure § 335.1, which gives two years for an action for injury caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another. Whether that period is still open on your facts, and whether anything about your situation changes it, is not something to work out from a webpage. Have a local attorney check the deadline for your case, and do it before the negotiation drags any further.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in California

Frequently Asked Questions

Can you sue an auto insurance company directly in California after a crash?

As a general rule, no. The claim is against the person whose negligence caused the harm, and the liability insurer's role is to defend that person and to pay a settlement or judgment up to the policy limits. The insurer's own name is on the check, not on the lawsuit. A separate claim against an insurer over how it handled the file is a different matter with different rules, and it is worth asking a local attorney about rather than assuming.

How long does a California insurer have to accept or deny an auto claim?

Under 10 California Code of Regulations § 2695.7(b), an insurer must accept or deny a claim, in whole or in part, immediately and in no event more than forty calendar days after receiving proof of claim. If it needs more time, § 2695.7(c)(1) requires written notice within that window and then every thirty calendar days until a determination is made. Section 2695.5(b) gives fifteen calendar days to respond to a claimant's communication that reasonably suggests a response is expected, and § 2695.7(h) gives thirty calendar days to tender payment after acceptance.

Is a passenger ever considered at fault in a single-vehicle crash?

Rarely, and only where the passenger's own conduct was part of what caused the harm. Civil Code § 1714(a) asks whose want of ordinary care occasioned the injury, and in a single-vehicle crash that inquiry is normally about the driver. Situations where a passenger's conduct is raised at all — interfering with the vehicle, for example — are unusual and heavily fact-dependent, and California allocates shares of responsibility rather than treating one person's carelessness as an all-or-nothing answer.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices