1LAW Logo

Do I Have A Case After Falling On A Lifted Sidewalk

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed April 2023

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

Yes, I was wondering if I have a case, because yesterday I was walking home from looking for a job and the concrete on the sidewalk is lifted up a little bit and I fell. I noticed when I got home that my ankle starts swelling up, and my wrist, and it's hurting me really bad now, and I was picking gravel out of my wrist. I was wondering if I have a case. Thank you.

Attorney Answer

Possibly — but be told two things straight away. A small lift in a sidewalk is one of the harder claims to bring in California, and if the city is responsible you have six months to present a claim, not two years.

Take the deadline first, because it is the one that can end the matter without anyone deciding anything. Cal. Gov't Code § 911.2(a) requires a claim for death or for injury to a person or to personal property against a public entity to be presented not later than six months after the cause of action accrues. It is a written claim, delivered to the entity, and under Cal. Gov't Code § 945.4 it comes before any lawsuit. You fell yesterday, so you have the full window and, just as valuable, the evidence is still on the ground.

Then who. Cal. Sts. & High. Code § 5610 requires owners of lots fronting on a public street to maintain the sidewalk so that it will not endanger persons or property. That sentence misleads a lot of people: the duty it creates runs to the city, and under California's sidewalk cases an abutting owner generally is not answerable to an injured pedestrian merely because the walk in front of the property was defective — unless the owner created the hazard. The exception is local. In Jordan v. City of Sacramento, 148 Cal. App. 4th 1487 (2007), the Court of Appeal addressed a city ordinance that shifted civil liability for defective sidewalks onto the abutting owner and held the shift effective, with the city entitled to indemnity if it were held liable. So whether the property owner is on the hook where you fell depends on your city's ordinance. Claim against the city, and identify the owner while you do it.

Now the hard part. Your own words are that the concrete is lifted "a little bit." California courts do not treat every irregularity in a walkway as actionable; how big the difference is, how well lit it was, whether anything obscured it, and whether there had been complaints before are what separate a claim from a bruise. That is why measuring and photographing the lift today matters more than anything else you can do.

And being partly at fault does not end a claim here. Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a) makes everyone responsible for an injury occasioned to another by a want of ordinary care in the management of his or her property, and applying that section the Supreme Court in Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978), described a pure comparative system in which a plaintiff's recovery is reduced only to the extent his own lack of reasonable care contributed to his injury.

What you can do

1. Go back today and photograph the lift, with a ruler or a coin laid against it so the height is visible, plus wide shots showing the lighting, the nearest address, and anything that hid it.

2. See a doctor about the ankle and the wrist now, and say you fell on a raised sidewalk. Swelling that appears the same day and is never examined becomes an argument later.

3. Photograph the injuries, and keep the clothing and shoes you were wearing.

4. Ask the city for its claim form and present a written claim. Cal. Gov't Code § 911.2(a) gives six months from accrual, and presenting it costs nothing.

5. Request from the city, in writing, any prior complaints, service requests, inspection records or repair orders for that stretch of sidewalk.

6. Ask a local attorney whether your city has an ordinance of the kind described in Jordan, and who owns the abutting property.

Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. Cal. Gov't Code § 911.2(a) is the deadline to work to: six months from accrual to present a claim to the public entity. A claim against a private abutting owner would run instead on Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1's two years. Which applies turns on who is responsible, which is the open question — so treat the six months as yours and have a local attorney check the dates now.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Jordan v. City of Sacramento, 148 Cal. App. 4th 1487 (2007) — Cal. Ct. App.
    A city ordinance shifting civil liability for defective sidewalks to the abutting property owner is effective, and the city is entitled to indemnity from the owner if held liable. Cited because it is what makes the answer depend on the reader's local ordinance rather than on § 5610 alone.
  • Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978) — Cal. Supreme Court
    Pure comparative negligence — recovery is reduced in proportion to the plaintiff's own want of care rather than barred. Cited because Rule 9 requires the pure-comparative statement on a personal-injury row and Civ. Code § 1714(a)'s text does not carry it.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in California

Frequently Asked Questions

Is every uneven sidewalk a valid injury claim in California?

No. California courts do not treat every irregularity in a walkway as actionable, and the size of the height difference is the first thing anyone will ask about. What else matters is the surrounding circumstances: lighting, weather, whether debris or shadow obscured the defect, whether the pedestrian's view was blocked, and whether the same defect had been reported before. Because a sidewalk is usually repaired at some point after a fall, photographing the defect with a ruler or coin for scale, and recording the date, is the step that decides whether the question can be answered at all later on.

In California, does the city or the neighboring property owner pay for a sidewalk injury?

It depends on the city's own ordinance. Cal. Sts. & High. Code § 5610 requires owners of lots fronting on a public street to maintain the sidewalk so it will not endanger persons or property, but that duty runs to the city; an abutting owner is generally not answerable to an injured pedestrian simply because the walk was defective, unless the owner created the hazard. Many California cities have adopted ordinances shifting civil liability to the abutting owner, and in Jordan v. City of Sacramento, 148 Cal. App. 4th 1487 (2007), the Court of Appeal held such an ordinance effective, with the city entitled to indemnity if held liable.

How soon must a sidewalk fall be reported to a California city?

Cal. Gov't Code § 911.2(a) requires a claim for death or for injury to person or personal property against a public entity to be presented not later than six months after the cause of action accrues. That is a written claim delivered to the entity, and under Cal. Gov't Code § 945.4 it must come before any lawsuit; a further short deadline under Cal. Gov't Code § 945.6(a) governs filing suit after the entity responds. If the six months has already passed, California has a statutory procedure under Cal. Gov't Code § 911.4 for applying to present a late claim, but it is narrow and carries its own deadline. A claim against a private abutting owner instead runs on the two years given by Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices