Fault After a Lane Change to Avoid a Speeder
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed June 6, 2024
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
I changed lanes to avoid a speeding car behind my car. I hit the other vehicle accidentally. What can the other vehicle do?
Attorney Answer
The other driver can present a claim to your insurer and, if that does not resolve it, sue you — and the reason you moved over may reduce your share of the blame without erasing it. California does not pick a single villain in a crash; it divides responsibility.
The rule that governs the movement itself is Cal. Veh. Code § 22107: "No person shall turn a vehicle from a direct course or move right or left upon a roadway until such movement can be made with reasonable safety and then only after the giving of an appropriate signal in the manner provided in this chapter in the event any other vehicle may be affected by the movement." A lane change made because of a car closing fast behind you is still measured by that standard — whether the movement could be made with reasonable safety, and whether it was signaled.
Liability then runs through Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a): "Everyone is responsible, not only for the result of his or her willful acts, but also for an injury occasioned to another by his or her want of ordinary care or skill in the management of his or her property or person, except so far as the latter has, willfully or by want of ordinary care, brought the injury upon himself or herself." California is a pure comparative fault state, and as the Supreme Court applied that section in Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978), responsibility is assigned in proportion to each party's share rather than in a single lump. The speeding driver behind you may carry a share too, if that driver can be identified and the facts support it. California also recognizes that a driver reacting to a genuine emergency not of their own making is judged by what was reasonable in that moment — how far that argument carries on your facts is a question for a local attorney, and it is an argument about percentage, not a defense that ends the claim.
There is also the ceiling to think about. For accidents before January 1, 2025, the minimum liability limits under Cal. Veh. Code § 16056(a) were $15,000 per person, $30,000 per accident and $5,000 for property damage; for accidents on or after that date they are $30,000, $60,000 and $15,000. If the other driver's damages run past your limits, the difference is your personal exposure. If a judgment were ever entered, California protects some property from collection — Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 704.010 exempts $7,500 in vehicle equity, and Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 704.730 sets a homestead exemption of at least $300,000, up to a $600,000 ceiling based on the countywide median home price, adjusted for inflation each year.
What you can do
1. Report the collision to your own insurer now if you have not, and give it the details it asks for. Your policy obliges you to cooperate, and late notice is a problem you do not need.
2. Send any letter, call or form from the other driver or their insurer to your own insurer, and let your insurer handle the discussion of fault.
3. Preserve what already exists: photographs, dashcam footage, the information exchanged at the scene, and the contact details of anyone who saw it.
4. Tell your insurer immediately if the other driver reports an injury rather than just vehicle damage — that changes which limit applies and how the claim is handled.
5. Ask a local attorney if the claim looks like it may exceed your policy limits, or if you are served with court papers; forward anything you are served to your insurer the same day.
Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.
⏱ Time limits apply. The other driver's claim for damage to the vehicle runs on Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 338(c)(1)'s three years, and any injury claim on Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1's two years. When each period started, and what it means for you, depends on the facts — a local attorney can tell you where you stand, and it is worth asking before an insurer's file closes rather than after.
Cases Cited
Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.
- Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978) — Cal. Supreme Court
Cited for the pure-comparative rule that responsibility is assigned in proportion to each party's fault rather than to one driver alone — the point the reader's question turns on, and one the text of Civ. Code § 1714(a) does not state.
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in California
- File or look up a case through the California Courts.
- Get free civil legal help from LawHelpCA.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is at fault when a driver changes lanes to avoid a tailgater and strikes another car?
Usually the driver who changed lanes carries a substantial share, because Cal. Veh. Code § 22107 requires that a driver not move right or left upon a roadway until the movement can be made with reasonable safety, and then only after an appropriate signal. But California allocates fault rather than assigning it to one person: under Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a), as applied by the Supreme Court in Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978), responsibility is divided in proportion to each party's own share. A driver who was speeding or tailgating can be given part of it, and a driver reacting to a genuine emergency not of their own making is judged by what was reasonable in that moment. Those are fact questions, and how they come out depends on the evidence in the particular crash.
Can a driver be sued personally in California if the damages are more than the insurance limits?
Yes. Liability insurance caps what the insurer pays, not what a person owes. Cal. Veh. Code § 16056(a) sets minimum limits of $15,000 per person, $30,000 per accident and $5,000 for property damage for accidents before January 1, 2025, and $30,000, $60,000 and $15,000 for accidents on or after that date — floors, not measures of a claim. If a judgment exceeds the coverage, the balance is the driver's own. California does shield some assets from collection: Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 704.010 exempts $7,500 in motor vehicle value, and Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 704.730 provides a homestead exemption of at least $300,000, up to a ceiling of $600,000 tied to the countywide median home price and adjusted annually for inflation.
How long does someone have to bring a claim after a California car accident?
Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 338(c)(1) allows three years for an action for injuring goods or chattels, which is the period for damage to a vehicle. Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 allows two years for an action for injury to, or the death of, an individual caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another. A single crash can carry both periods at once, running from different events, and claims against a public entity are governed by a much shorter presentment deadline. When a period began to run in a particular case is a legal question worth checking rather than assuming.