Fault and Next Steps After Backing Out of a Space
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed January 5, 2022
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
I got into an accident while backing out of a parking lot. How should I approach the situation?
Attorney Answer
A driver backing out of a space carries most of the fault in most of these collisions — but "most" is not "all," and California divides fault between drivers instead of handing the whole of it to one.
The root rule is Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a): everyone is responsible for an injury occasioned to another by want of ordinary care in the management of their property or person. A driver reversing into a lane of travel is moving into space they cannot fully see, which is why insurers usually start with the backing driver. But that is a starting point, not a verdict. The other driver's own conduct — speed in a lot, attention, whether they were driving the wrong way down an aisle — is weighed too.
That matters because of how California splits the result. In Daly v. General Motors Corp. the California Supreme Court reaffirmed and applied this state's pure comparative system, under which an injured person's recovery is reduced in proportion to their own lack of reasonable care rather than eliminated. Read from your side, a share of fault on the other driver reduces what you end up paying. It is a reason not to concede the whole of it before anyone has looked at the evidence.
Two further questions bear on this: the specific rule for backing a vehicle, and how the Vehicle Code's rules of the road apply inside a private lot. Those are questions for a local attorney rather than assumptions to build on.
On duties at the scene, Cal. Veh. Code § 20002(a) requires a driver involved in an accident resulting only in damage to property, including vehicles, to stop immediately at the nearest location that will not impede traffic and to identify themselves; Cal. Veh. Code § 20001(a) applies the stopping duty where someone was injured. If you stopped and exchanged information, that part is behind you.
What the other driver can recover is measured by Cal. Civ. Code § 3333: the amount that will compensate for all the detriment proximately caused, whether or not it could have been anticipated. For a damaged car that generally means repair cost or value, plus losses like being without the vehicle. Your liability insurer ordinarily handles that claim and its defense under your policy. Cal. Veh. Code § 16000(a) also requires an accident report to go to the Department of Motor Vehicles after certain crashes, so ask the DMV or a local attorney whether it applies.
What you can do
1. Report the collision to your own insurer promptly — most policies require prompt notice, and late notice is a problem that costs nothing to avoid.
2. Preserve what already exists rather than writing something new: photographs of both vehicles and where they came to rest, the information you exchanged, and any messages since.
3. Ask the parking lot's business, in writing and today, to preserve any camera footage of the aisle. Lot video is usually overwritten within days.
4. Give your insurer the names and contact details of anyone who saw it, including passengers.
5. If anyone reports an injury, or the police contact you, speak with a local attorney before giving any statement.
6. Ask a local attorney whether the other driver's own conduct puts part of the fault on that side.
Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.
⏱ Time limits apply. A claim for damage to a vehicle runs on the three years given by Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 338(c)(1), and an injury claim on the two years in Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 — the shorter of the two, and the one that catches people out when a claim arrives long after the repair is done. When each period started depends on your facts, so have a local attorney check the dates.
Cases Cited
Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.
- Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978) — Cal. Supreme Court
Cited for the judge-made rule that a person's recovery is reduced in proportion to their own share of fault rather than eliminated — the text of Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a) does not state it, and the reader's question is precisely whether backing out means bearing all of it.
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in California
- File or look up a case through the California Courts.
- Get free civil legal help from LawHelpCA.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the driver backing out of a parking space always at fault in California?
Not automatically. Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a) makes everyone responsible for an injury occasioned to another by want of ordinary care, and fault is decided on the evidence about what each driver did. A reversing driver is moving into space they cannot fully see, which is why insurers often start there, but the other driver's speed, attention, and direction of travel in the lot are weighed as well. Where both drivers fall short, California allocates the fault between them rather than assigning it to one.
If both drivers are partly at fault in California, who pays?
Both, in proportion. California follows pure comparative fault: in Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978), the California Supreme Court reaffirmed and applied the system under which an injured person's recovery is reduced only to the extent their own lack of reasonable care contributed to the injury. Recovery is reduced by a person's share of the fault; it is not eliminated by it, however large that share is. The statutory root is Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a).
What must a driver do after a collision in a parking lot?
Cal. Veh. Code § 20002(a) requires the driver of a vehicle involved in an accident resulting only in damage to property, including vehicles, to stop immediately at the nearest location that will not impede traffic and to identify themselves to the other owner, leaving written identifying information where the owner cannot be located, and then notifying the police or the CHP without unnecessary delay. Where a person was injured, Cal. Veh. Code § 20001(a) requires an immediate stop at the scene and carries much heavier penalties. Whether those Vehicle Code duties reach private property is a question for a local attorney.