1LAW Logo

Finding a Hit-and-Run Driver Years After the Crash

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed February 2023

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I was the victim of a hit-and-run 6 years ago. I just located the driver last week.

Attorney Answer

Probably not — but do not assume that on your own, and do not wait. Six years is well past the deadline California sets for an injury claim from a crash, and locating the driver now does not by itself restart the clock.

The governing statute is Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1: "Within two years: An action for assault, battery, or injury to, or for the death of, an individual caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another." If the crash caused injuries, that two-year period is what you are measured against. A claim for damage to the car alone runs longer — Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 338(c)(1) gives three years for injuring goods or chattels — but three years is also long past.

California law does contain rules that pause these periods in specific situations. The one this page can name is Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 352(a), which stops the clock while a person entitled to bring the action was under the age of majority or lacked the legal capacity to make decisions; the time of that disability is not counted. Whether any other rule could reach your situation — including an argument built on the driver's identity being unknown until last week — is not something this page can resolve. That is a question to put to a lawyer immediately rather than one to guess at.

Two things are worth keeping separate. Whether a prosecutor can still bring a criminal hit-and-run case is a different question, on different deadlines, decided by the district attorney and not by you. The driver's duty to stop — Cal. Veh. Code § 20001(a) where someone is injured or killed, Cal. Veh. Code § 20002(a) where only property is damaged — is that criminal side. Your civil claim would rest instead on ordinary negligence under Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a), which makes a person responsible for an injury occasioned to another by want of ordinary care.

What you can do

1. Gather what you still have before anything else — the police report number, photographs, medical records, repair bills and any insurance correspondence from the time.

2. Ask a California personal-injury attorney to review the dates this week. The only question that matters now is whether an exception reaches your facts, and that is a legal judgment rather than a form to fill in.

3. Tell that lawyer at once if you were under 18 at the time of the crash, or lacked legal capacity then. Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 352(a) can change the analysis entirely.

4. If you made a claim on your own policy back then, ask your insurer for its file and whether it ever pursued the driver.

5. You can give the driver's identity to the law-enforcement agency that took the original report. That is separate from any civil claim and costs you nothing.

6. Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts with someone who handles these cases in your area is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. Injury claims run on Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1's two years and vehicle-damage claims on § 338(c)(1)'s three. Which period applies, when it started, and whether anything paused it depend on facts this page does not have. Have a California attorney review your dates now — this page does not calculate a deadline for you, and on a crash this old the review itself is the urgent part.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in California

Frequently Asked Questions

How long do you have to sue after a car accident in California?

Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 sets two years for an action for injury to, or the death of, an individual caused by another's wrongful act or neglect. A claim for damage to a vehicle runs on Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 338(c)(1)'s three years. If a public entity is involved, Cal. Gov't Code § 911.2(a) requires a claim to be presented to that entity within six months of accrual, which is far shorter than either. When a period starts, and whether anything pauses it, is fact-specific.

Does the deadline pause while a hit-and-run driver is unidentified?

California's limitations statutes do not contain a general rule to that effect. The tolling rule named in the Code of Civil Procedure is § 352(a), which stops the clock while a person entitled to bring the action is under the age of majority or lacks the legal capacity to make decisions. Whether any other doctrine reaches a particular case is a fact-specific legal question, and it should be put to an attorney quickly rather than assumed.

Can a hit-and-run driver still be sued if no criminal charges were filed?

Yes. Criminal prosecution and civil liability are separate. The duty to stop is a Vehicle Code matter — § 20001(a) where a person is injured or killed, § 20002(a) for property damage only — and whether to charge it is the prosecutor's decision. A civil claim rests on Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a), which makes a person responsible for injury caused by want of ordinary care, whether or not a case is ever filed. The civil deadlines run on their own.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices