1LAW Logo

How Fault Is Determined When You Have Crash Video

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed April 13, 2023

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I was just in an accident. I have a video. I want to know whose fault this was.

Attorney Answer

A video helps, but it rarely decides fault by itself — and in California, being partly at fault does not end your claim. A recording is evidence, not a verdict. An adjuster, and ultimately a jury, weighs it against everything else: the traffic collision report, the damage patterns on both cars, the road and weather conditions, speed, and what each driver did in the seconds before impact.

California's negligence rule is a statute, not a formula. Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a) provides: “Everyone is responsible, not only for the result of his or her willful acts, but also for an injury occasioned to another by his or her want of ordinary care or skill in the management of his or her property or person, except so far as the latter has, willfully or by want of ordinary care, brought the injury upon himself or herself.” Fault, in plain terms, means a failure to use ordinary care that caused the harm.

The closing clause of that sentence is what worries people. It does not mean that carelessness on your part shuts the door. California applies pure comparative fault. In Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978), the California Supreme Court reaffirmed a system that assigns responsibility in direct proportion to each party's negligence, so an injured person's recovery is reduced only to the extent his own lack of reasonable care contributed to the injury. Fault is a percentage split between the drivers, not a door that closes on you.

Video is most useful where it settles something that would otherwise be one driver's word against the other's: which light was green, who changed lanes, whether a turn signal was on, how fast a car was closing. It is least useful for what it cannot show, such as what a driver could see from inside the car. It can also show something you did not expect — which is a reason to watch it carefully before you describe the crash to anyone.

What you can do

1. Back up the video today, in its original file, to two places. Do not trim it, add music, or export a shortened version; the untouched file, with its date and time information, is what carries weight.

2. Write down the traffic collision report number and the agency that responded, and request a copy of the report from that agency.

3. Photograph both vehicles, the roadway, and any skid marks or debris before repairs begin.

4. See a doctor promptly if anything hurts, and keep every bill, discharge instruction and referral in one folder.

5. Report the crash to your own insurer as your policy requires.

6. Ask a local lawyer before you give a recorded statement to the other driver's insurer, post the video publicly, or sign anything. Those are choices with consequences a general page cannot weigh for you.

Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 gives two years for a personal injury claim, and Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 338(c)(1) gives three years for damage to your vehicle. Which period applies to you, and when it started running on your facts, is exactly the question to put to a local attorney now rather than later. This page will not calculate your deadline, and you should not calculate it yourself.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978) — California Supreme Court
    Reaffirms California's pure comparative negligence system — responsibility assigned in direct proportion to each party's negligence, recovery reduced rather than barred. Cited because § 1714(a)'s text reads as if a claimant's own want of care defeats the claim; only the case supplies the 'reduced, not eliminated' gloss.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in California

Frequently Asked Questions

Does dashcam video prove who was at fault in a California car accident?

Not on its own. Video is one piece of evidence. Under Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a), fault means a failure to use ordinary care that caused the harm, and that judgment is made on all the evidence — the collision report, the damage, road conditions, speed and what each driver did. Video is strongest where it settles a disputed fact, such as which car changed lanes or what color the light was, and it can cut against the person who recorded it just as easily as for them.

Can a driver who was partly at fault still recover damages in California?

Yes. California follows pure comparative fault. In Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978), the California Supreme Court reaffirmed a system that assigns responsibility in direct proportion to each party's negligence, so a partly at-fault person's recovery is reduced by their own share rather than eliminated. There is no percentage of fault at which recovery is cut off entirely.

How long does someone have to bring a car accident claim in California?

Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 sets two years for personal injury or wrongful death, and Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 338(c)(1) sets three years for damage to a vehicle. Shorter deadlines exist: a claim against a public entity must generally be presented within six months under Cal. Gov't Code § 911.2(a). Which period governs depends on who is being claimed against, so the deadline should be confirmed with a lawyer rather than assumed.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices