1LAW Logo

Insurer Delay in Deciding Liability After a Rear-End Crash

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed August 2, 2024

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

Let's say I was in a car accident with my family (mom, dad, sister). We got rear-ended by another car. The person driving the car, however, is not the owner. He stated he was the brother-in-law. We exchanged information. I filed a claim with the insurance. It has been a week, and the insurance states they are waiting on the driver's statement to finalize liability. Does that mean the other person is not responding? My dad states that because we didn't file a police report, the insurance doesn't really prioritize us. What else can I do in this situation to speed it along? I have dashcam footage I could submit to them.

Attorney Answer

A week is not yet a delay under California's claim rules, and the missing police report is not what is holding this up. The regulations give the insurer a fixed schedule, your dashcam footage is the fastest way to shorten it, and the fact that the driver did not own the car adds a second place to look rather than a problem.

Fault first. Cal. Veh. Code § 21703 provides: "The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicle and the traffic upon, and the condition of, the roadway." Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a) makes that driver responsible for an injury occasioned to another by a want of ordinary care in the management of his or her property or person. The driver's own liability is not capped by anything.

The owner is a second target. Cal. Veh. Code § 17150 makes the owner of a vehicle responsible for death or injury to person or property resulting from a negligent or wrongful act or omission in the operation of that vehicle by a person using it with the owner's permission, express or implied. Cal. Veh. Code § 17151(a) caps that particular owner liability at $15,000 for injury to one person, $30,000 for one accident and $5,000 for property damage — figures the Legislature has left alone for decades, and lower than what the owner's policy will usually pay on its own terms. That is very likely why the insurer wants the driver's statement: whether the person driving had permission decides whether the owner's policy responds at all. It is a coverage question, not a sign that anyone is stalling.

Now the schedule. Under Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.5(e), an insurer that receives notice of a claim has fifteen calendar days to acknowledge it, provide the necessary forms, instructions and reasonable assistance, and begin any necessary investigation. Under § 2695.5(b), it owes a complete response within fifteen calendar days to a communication from a claimant that reasonably expects one. Under § 2695.7(b), it has forty calendar days after receiving proof of claim to accept or deny the claim in whole or in part, and an insurer that disputes liability on a third-party claim must do so in writing. Under § 2695.7(c)(1), if it needs more time it must say so in writing inside that window and then every thirty calendar days until it decides. Section 2695.7(d) requires a thorough, fair and objective investigation and forbids persisting in seeking information not reasonably required. None of those clocks depends on a police report.

What you can do

1. Send the dashcam footage in writing today, with a short cover message giving the claim number, the date and what the footage shows, and ask for written confirmation that it was received and added to the file.

2. Ask the insurer in writing for a written liability decision, and for the date it treats as its receipt of your proof of claim. That sets the forty-day period running from a date you both know.

3. Ask it, also in writing, whether it has accepted that the driver had the owner's permission. A delayed liability decision on a borrowed car is usually about that.

4. Report a claim under your own policy in parallel if you carry collision coverage. Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.7(p) requires your insurer to tell you whether it will pursue subrogation, and § 2695.7(q) requires it to include your deductible in its demand and to share recoveries with you proportionately.

5. If those deadlines pass without a decision or a written explanation, file a complaint with the California Department of Insurance. Section 2695.7(b)(3) requires a written denial to disclose that review right and give the department's address and telephone number.

6. Have anyone in the car with symptoms seen by a doctor and keep the records — each person in the car has their own claim, and their own records prove it.

7. Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. A claim for injury to a person runs under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1, which allows two years, and a claim for damage to the car under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 338(c)(1), which allows three. Each person in the car has a separate claim and a separate clock. When each began depends on your facts, so have a local attorney check the dates against your file before an insurer closes it.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in California

Frequently Asked Questions

How long can an insurer take to decide liability on a claim in California?

The claim-handling regulations set the outside limits. Under Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.5(e), an insurer has fifteen calendar days after notice of a claim to acknowledge it, provide the necessary forms and reasonable assistance, and begin any necessary investigation. Under § 2695.7(b), it has forty calendar days after receiving proof of claim to accept or deny the claim in whole or in part, and it must dispute liability on a third-party claim in writing. Under § 2695.7(c)(1), if it needs more time it must give written notice inside that window and then every thirty calendar days until it decides. Section 2695.7(d) requires a thorough, fair and objective investigation.

Does the absence of a police report weaken a car accident claim?

It does not disable the claim, and no regulation makes a police report a condition of one. A report is one piece of evidence among others: photographs, damage patterns, witness accounts and dashcam footage all serve the same purpose, and footage is often stronger than a report written by an officer who did not see the crash. Where the absence of a report tends to matter is when the parties' accounts differ and there is nothing independent to break the tie, which is the reason to put objective evidence in front of the insurer in writing and early.

Is the owner of a car responsible when someone else was driving it?

Within a limit, yes. Cal. Veh. Code § 17150 makes the owner of a vehicle responsible for death or injury to person or property resulting from a negligent or wrongful act or omission in the operation of the vehicle by a person using it with the owner's permission, express or implied. Cal. Veh. Code § 17151(a) caps that statutory owner liability at $15,000 for injury to one person, $30,000 for one accident and $5,000 for property damage — figures unchanged for decades and lower than the current minimum policy limits. The driver's own liability is not capped by that section, and whether the owner's policy responds is a separate question governed by the policy, which usually turns on permission.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices