Personal Insurance Requests After a Company-Vehicle Crash
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed November 19, 2024
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
I was driving my company van and involved in a multiple-car accident on a freeway. Now the other person's lawyer wants my personal insurance information, even though I have a valid commercial insurance through my company.
Attorney Answer
You are not the right person to be answering that letter. A request from the other side's lawyer, before any lawsuit, is a demand rather than a court order, and nothing about it requires you to respond personally. Send it to your employer and to the commercial carrier and let them deal with it. If you have already been served with a lawsuit, that is a different situation and it needs attention today.
The reason the commercial policy is the right layer is that you were working. Under long-settled California law an employer answers for an employee's negligence committed within the scope of employment, and the Court of Appeal applied that principle to an employee driving a company vehicle while on duty in Moreno v. Visser Ranch, Inc., 30 Cal. App. 5th 568 (2018). That is why the claim belongs first to your employer's commercial coverage, not to the policy on your own car.
The statute that backs you up if you end up out of pocket is Cal. Lab. Code § 2802(a). It requires an employer to indemnify an employee for all necessary expenditures or losses the employee incurs in direct consequence of the discharge of their duties. A crash that happened while you were driving the company van on company business sits squarely in that language.
Your personal policy may still have something to say — many personal auto policies limit or exclude coverage for a vehicle furnished for your regular use — but that is a question of your policy's wording and of your insurer's coverage position. It is not something you settle by handing your policy information to the lawyer suing you.
Two related points. California drivers do have obligations at the scene to provide evidence of financial responsibility (Cal. Veh. Code § 16028(a), (c)), and separate obligations to report certain collisions to the Department of Motor Vehicles (Cal. Veh. Code § 16000(a)), so ask a local attorney whether either reaches your crash. And if you were injured yourself while driving for work, the workers' compensation system is the route as against your employer: Cal. Lab. Code § 3602(a) makes compensation the employee's exclusive remedy against the employer where the conditions of compensation concur, with narrow exceptions. That does not affect claims against other drivers.
What you can do
1. Do not respond to the other side's lawyer yourself, and do not send them documents.
2. Forward the letter to your employer today and ask them to put it in front of the commercial carrier.
3. Report the accident to the commercial carrier directly if your employer does not confirm within a few days that it has been reported.
4. Notify your own personal auto insurer that a claim has been made against you. Most policies require notice, and giving notice is not the same as tendering the claim or accepting that the policy applies.
5. Keep the letter and the envelope, and note the date it arrived.
6. If you have been served with a lawsuit, tell your employer and both insurers the same day. A default can be entered while you are still deciding what to do.
7. If you were hurt, report it to your employer as a work injury.
8. Ask a local attorney whether your own coverage should be tendered at all, before you tender it.
Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts with someone who practices in your area is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.
⏱ Time limits apply. Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 generally allows two years for a claim for injury or death, and Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 338(c)(1) generally allows three years for damage to a vehicle. Those periods govern the claim being made against you as well as any claim of your own. If a public entity is involved in the crash, Cal. Gov't Code § 911.2(a)'s six months to present a claim is far shorter, and workers' compensation runs on its own deadlines. Where each stands depends on facts a page cannot see, so have a local attorney review the dates rather than counting from the calendar.
Cases Cited
Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.
- Moreno v. Visser Ranch, Inc., 30 Cal. App. 5th 568 (2018) — Cal. Ct. App.
Cited because the sentence that resolves the reader's question — that the employer, and so the commercial policy, answers for an employee driving the company vehicle on duty — is judge-made respondeat superior and is not stated in the text of Cal. Lab. Code § 2802(a).
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in California
- File or look up a case through the California Courts.
- Get free civil legal help from LawHelpCA.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is responsible when an employee crashes a company vehicle while working?
In California an employer answers for an employee's negligence committed within the scope of employment, a principle the Court of Appeal applied to an employee driving a company vehicle on duty in Moreno v. Visser Ranch, Inc., 30 Cal. App. 5th 568 (2018). The employer's commercial policy is therefore normally the coverage that responds. The employee can still be named individually, and whether the driver was in the scope of employment at the moment of the crash is often the contested issue.
Does an employer have to reimburse an employee for losses from a crash that happened on the job?
Cal. Lab. Code § 2802(a) requires an employer to indemnify an employee for all necessary expenditures or losses the employee incurs in direct consequence of the discharge of their duties. That is the basis an employee looks to when they end up personally out of pocket after something that happened while working. Where the employee was injured rather than out of pocket, Cal. Lab. Code § 3602(a) generally makes workers' compensation the exclusive remedy against the employer.
Do you have to give your personal insurance information to the other side's lawyer?
A demand letter is not a court order, and it does not by itself compel a response. Once a lawsuit is filed, insurance information is ordinarily discoverable through the formal process, and the defense counsel the insurer appoints handles that. Notifying your own insurer that a claim has been made is a separate matter and is required by most policies; notice is not the same as tendering the claim.