1LAW Logo

Questioning a Settlement Breakdown Before Signing the Release

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed April 6, 2023

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

Well, I was injured really bad due to a rear-end collision on the freeway and was not at fault. I hired an attorney but feel scammed in regards to the settlement money, which is why I haven't signed yet, since the original people who worked on my case no longer work there and are now claiming that the percentage going to me is 5000 dollars less than what I was originally told by someone else. I feel that what I'm getting is extremely low considering I'm still in debt from the accident, and I don't know what to do, because they are demanding that I sign the settlement agreement, and out of 21000 I'm only getting 5000 when I was originally told that I would be getting 10000. But when I mentioned it, they acted like they had no idea what I was talking about and went to look for the email, but they somehow blocked the original info on the email to where I can't see what it says anymore, and they would not give me a breakdown until recently, which is why it took so long, since I requested that in order to sign.

Attorney Answer

Do not sign until you have a written breakdown you understand. Once you sign the release, the claim is over, and the leverage you have right now is the signature you have not yet given.

Cal. Civ. Code § 1541 states the reason bluntly: "An obligation is extinguished by a release therefrom given to the debtor or the released party by the creditor or releasing party, upon a new consideration, or in writing, with or without new consideration." A signed written release ends the obligation. That is why the sequence matters — the breakdown comes first, the signature second, and not the other way around.

Keep two separate disputes apart in your mind, because they have different answers.

The first is the settlement with the insurer: whether $21,000 is a fair resolution of your claim. That is a judgment about the value of your case, and no page can make it for you.

The second is the disbursement — how $21,000 becomes $5,000 in your hands. That is a question about the fee, the costs and the liens, and it is answerable on paper. A settlement breakdown should show the gross settlement, the attorney's fee and the percentage it was calculated at, each cost advanced, and every medical bill or lien being paid from the proceeds. In California, a contingency fee arrangement must be set out in a written agreement signed by the client, and a client is entitled to an accounting of what is deducted. If the numbers you were told changed when the staff on your case changed, the fee agreement and the written breakdown are the two documents that settle it. The State Bar of California also runs a fee arbitration program for disputes between a client and a lawyer over fees — that is a route worth asking about, and it does not require you to file anything in court.

If your health care was paid by a public program, a portion of the recovery may have to be repaid. Where Medi-Cal benefits were provided because of an injury for which another party is liable, Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 14124.71(a) gives the director a right to recover the reasonable value of those benefits from that party or carrier. That reduces your net; it does not make the settlement wrong. A lien like that belongs on the breakdown as its own line.

What you can do

1. Ask, in writing, for a full written settlement breakdown: the gross amount, the fee and the percentage used, each cost itemized, and every lien or medical bill being paid, with the supporting statements attached. Keep a copy of the request and the date.

2. Ask, in the same letter, for a copy of your signed fee agreement and for the earlier email about your expected share.

3. Do not sign the release or the disbursement statement until the numbers add up and you understand each line. Under Cal. Civ. Code § 1541, a written release extinguishes the obligation, and there is generally no undoing it afterward.

4. Ask the State Bar of California about its fee arbitration program for client fee disputes.

5. Ask a second local attorney to review the fee agreement and the breakdown before you sign. Many will look at those two documents on a short call.

6. Ask that attorney about the deadlines below, which are short. Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts with someone who handles these cases in your area is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. Two clocks matter here and they run differently. The settlement offer itself may carry a deadline set by the insurer or by the agreement's own terms. Separately, Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 340.6(a) generally requires an action against an attorney for a wrongful act or omission, other than actual fraud, to be commenced within one year after the client discovers, or through reasonable diligence should have discovered, the facts constituting the act or omission, or four years from the act or omission, whichever occurs first. One year from discovery is among the shortest periods in California law, and the day you first questioned these numbers may matter to it. Have a local attorney review the dates on your facts rather than counting from this page.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in California

Frequently Asked Questions

What does signing a release do in California?

Cal. Civ. Code § 1541 provides: "An obligation is extinguished by a release therefrom given to the debtor or the released party by the creditor or releasing party, upon a new consideration, or in writing, with or without new consideration." In practical terms, a signed written release ends the claim it covers, and it generally cannot be undone because the person who signed later concludes the amount was too low. That is why questions about the amount and the deductions belong before the signature rather than after it.

Can a client question the fees and costs taken out of a settlement?

Yes. A client is entitled to a written accounting of what is deducted from a settlement — the fee and the percentage it was calculated at, each cost advanced, and each lien or medical bill paid from the proceeds — and in California a contingency fee arrangement must be set out in a written agreement signed by the client. The State Bar of California runs a fee arbitration program for fee disputes between a client and a lawyer, which does not require a court filing. Where a public health program paid for treatment, Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 14124.71(a) may give it a right to be repaid from the recovery, and that belongs on the breakdown as its own line.

How long does a client have to bring a claim against their own attorney in California?

Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 340.6(a) generally requires an action against an attorney for a wrongful act or omission, other than actual fraud, to be commenced within one year after the client discovers, or through the use of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the facts constituting the wrongful act or omission, or four years from the date of the act or omission, whichever occurs first. The statute contains its own tolling provisions. Because one year from discovery is very short, a client who suspects a problem should have the dates reviewed promptly rather than waiting to see how the matter resolves.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices