1LAW Logo

Red-Light Collision With Pain Felt the Next Day

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed September 11, 2023

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I was driving my car on a main road. At an intersection, another car ran a red light and hit the driver's side of my car. The impact caused damage to the front left side of my vehicle. No injuries were reported at the time of the accident, but I did feel pain in my legs, left thumb and my neck on the next day. Also, I missed a couple of days of work because I had no car due to this incident.

Attorney Answer

Pain that starts the next morning is ordinary after a collision, and it does not sink your claim — what it does is put a premium on getting examined and on having the record show it. The other driver's insurer will look at the gap between the crash and your first medical visit, so the sooner that visit happens, the less there is to argue about.

The rule that decides fault is Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a): "Everyone is responsible, not only for the result of his or her willful acts, but also for an injury occasioned to another by his or her want of ordinary care or skill in the management of his or her property or person, except so far as the latter has, willfully or by want of ordinary care, brought the injury upon himself or herself." A driver who enters an intersection against a red light and strikes a car lawfully crossing it is the standard example of that failure of ordinary care; the Vehicle Code sets the signal rules themselves, and a local attorney can tell you which section the police or the insurer will point to.

California is a pure comparative fault state. Under § 1714(a), as the Supreme Court applied it in Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978), a claimant's recovery is reduced in proportion to that claimant's own share of fault and is never wiped out by it. So even if the other insurer argues you could have avoided the impact, that is an argument about a percentage, not about whether you may claim at all.

What you can be paid for is set by Cal. Civ. Code § 3333: "For the breach of an obligation not arising from contract, the measure of damages, except where otherwise expressly provided by this Code, is the amount which will compensate for all the detriment proximately caused thereby, whether it could have been anticipated or not." That reaches the repair or value of the car, the treatment for your neck, thumb and legs, and the pay you lost from the days you could not get to work — each of them as a proven loss, not an assumed one.

The claim also runs on a clock the regulations impose on the insurer. After receiving notice of a claim, an insurer has 15 calendar days to acknowledge it, provide the necessary forms and instructions, and begin its investigation (Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.5(e)). After receiving proof of claim it has 40 calendar days to accept or deny in whole or in part (Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.7(b)), and 30 calendar days to pay what it has accepted (§ 2695.7(h)).

What you can do

1. Get examined now if you have not been, and tell the provider the pain began the day after a collision. That sentence in the chart is what ties the injury to the crash.

2. Report the claim to both insurers, in writing if you can, and write down the claim numbers.

3. Keep the paper: the exchange of information, photographs of both cars, repair estimates, medical bills, and anything from your employer showing the days and pay you missed.

4. Ask the insurer, in writing, for its position if 40 days pass with no acceptance or denial, and file a complaint with the California Department of Insurance if it stays silent.

5. Ask a local attorney to look at any settlement paper before you sign it. Under Cal. Civ. Code § 1541 a written release extinguishes the obligation, and Cal. Civ. Code § 1542 provides that a general release does not extend to claims the releasing party does not know or suspect to exist at the time of signing — though most insurer release forms ask you to waive that protection expressly, which is exactly what a lawyer would look for in the paper.

Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 gives two years to bring an injury claim, and Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 338(c)(1) gives three years for damage to the vehicle. When each period started, and whether it is still open on your facts, is exactly the question to put to a local attorney now rather than later — these deadlines are hard, and a claim that misses one ends regardless of its merits.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978) — Cal. Supreme Court
    Cited for the pure-comparative rule that a claimant's recovery is reduced in proportion to that claimant's own fault rather than barred — the text of Civ. Code § 1714(a) does not state that consequence, and this reader will be met with a shared-fault argument.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in California

Frequently Asked Questions

Does pain that starts a day or two after a car accident weaken an injury claim in California?

No rule bars a claim because symptoms appeared late; delayed neck, back and joint pain after a collision is common. What a delay affects is proof. The insurer will argue that a gap between the crash and the first medical visit shows the injury came from something else, so the gap is worth closing quickly and the chart should record that the pain began after a collision. Cal. Civ. Code § 3333 allows compensation for all detriment proximately caused by the wrongful act, which means the connection between the crash and the symptoms has to be shown rather than assumed.

Can a person recover lost wages after a car crash if the missed work was caused by losing the use of the car?

It is possible but not automatic. Cal. Civ. Code § 3333 sets the measure of tort damages as the amount that will compensate for all the detriment proximately caused, whether or not it could have been anticipated, which is broad enough to reach lost income and the loss of use of a vehicle. The claimant still has to show the loss actually followed from the crash and prove the amount — pay records, an employer's statement, and rental or repair invoices are the usual evidence. Insurers frequently dispute this category, and a local attorney can say how it is best documented.

How long does a California insurer have to accept or deny a claim?

Under Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.7(b), an insurer must accept or deny a claim, in whole or in part, immediately but no more than 40 calendar days after receiving proof of claim. If it needs more time, it must give written notice within that window and then update the claimant in writing every 30 calendar days until it decides (§ 2695.7(c)(1)). Once a claim is accepted, payment is due within 30 calendar days (§ 2695.7(h)). Separately, an insurer has 15 calendar days from notice of a claim to acknowledge it, send the necessary forms and instructions, and begin investigating (Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.5(e)).

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices