Refund Claim for a Misrepresented Real Estate Investing Program
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Managing Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed September 3, 2025
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
The man sold me a real estate program in which I signed a contract and paid him $3,000 for the program. He initially told me before signing the contract that I would need $8,000 for a down payment to buy a tenant residence and that I would have 80 days to fully complete the program to see if I would want a refund or not. After speaking with him dutifully multiple times, that I could not finish the program within the 80 days, and he misled me because most of the down payments are in the $10,000-15,000 range, I told him I'd like a refund. He stated that I had have to at least go through with the program. I believe I deserve a refund because he misled the amount of money needed and the time needed was something that could not be filled with my schedule. I had explained this to him over and over again. The oddest thing is, if I didn't have the money to pay for a down payment, I would never had been able to start this program. He entirely misled me from the beginning and I cannot start the program (to reiterate).
Can I file and get a successful claim for such a situation?
Attorney Answer
You may have a valid claim to rescind the contract and recover what you paid if the down-payment figure and the completion timeline were misrepresented to get you to sign — but a delay in giving notice of rescission is the single most common way this kind of claim is lost, so this is time-sensitive.
Civ. Code § 1689(b)(1) allows a party to rescind a contract where that party's consent was obtained through fraud. Civ. Code § 1572 defines actual fraud in a contract to include the positive assertion, in a manner not warranted by the information of the person making it, of something that is not true — even where the speaker believed it — and separately includes a promise made without any intention of performing it. If you were told $8,000 would cover a down payment when the program's own deals typically require $10,000 to $15,000, or given an 80-day completion window that could not realistically be met, either could support a fraud-based rescission claim. Those two subdivisions matter because neither requires you to prove the seller actually disbelieved what he was saying.
Rescission is not just a lawsuit theory — it is an act you have to take. California generally requires a rescinding party to give notice of rescission promptly after discovering the grounds and to offer to restore anything of value received under the contract. Waiting undermines the claim.
Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 separately defines unfair competition to include any unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent business act or practice, which can support its own claim. Its remedies, though, are limited to injunctive relief and restitution — no damages and no attorney's fees under that statute itself. For actually recovering the $3,000 you paid, rescission and fraud are the direct routes; the unfair-competition theory is an additional angle rather than the main one.
What you can do
1. Send prompt written notice of rescission, ideally with proof of delivery, stating that you are rescinding based on the misrepresented down-payment range and timeline and demanding return of what you paid.
2. Gather everything in writing: the contract, marketing materials, and any messages where the $8,000 figure and the 80-day window were represented to you before you signed.
3. Document what you were told afterward about the actual down-payment range, and anything indicating the seller knew or should have known that when the original representation was made.
4. Consider small claims court given the amount involved, or consult a consumer-fraud attorney about a formal demand letter first.
5. Keep every payment record showing how and when you paid, since rescission works by restoring both sides to where they started.
Time limits: A rescission claim depends on giving notice without unreasonable delay once you discover the grounds, and separate filing deadlines apply to fraud and contract claims. Both run from facts specific to your situation, so get individual review from a California attorney promptly rather than relying on any general timeframe.
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in California
- File or look up a case through the California Courts.
- Get free civil legal help from LawHelpCA.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
- Visit FTC — Report Fraud to report scams and deceptive business practices.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between rescission and suing for damages in a fraud case?
Rescission unwinds the contract entirely and returns both parties to their pre-contract positions — the consumer gets the money back and returns anything of value received. A damages claim instead lets the contract stand and compensates for losses. Which route fits depends on the facts and on what was actually exchanged.
Does a seller have to intend to lie for a misrepresentation to count as fraud in California?
Not necessarily. California's definition of actual fraud in a contract reaches a positive assertion made in a manner not warranted by the speaker's information, even where the speaker believed it, as well as a promise made with no intention of performing it.
How quickly does someone have to act after discovering they were defrauded into a contract?
Promptly. California generally requires a party seeking rescission to give notice of rescission and offer to restore whatever was received without unreasonable delay after discovering the grounds. Waiting can undermine the claim independently of any filing deadline.