1LAW Logo

Responding to an Injury Demand After an At-Fault Crash

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed October 1, 2024

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

A party is claiming personal injury from a car accident for the sum of $27,000. They declined medical treatment at the time of the accident. What are my options?

Attorney Answer

Declining treatment at the scene does not defeat their claim — soft-tissue injuries commonly show up a day or two later, and adjusters and juries know it. But it is a real weakness in their case, and the number in a demand letter is a number someone chose, not a number you owe. Your main option is to put this in your insurer's hands and stop talking to the other side.

What they have to prove comes from Civil Code § 1714(a): "Everyone is responsible, not only for the result of his or her willful acts, but also for an injury occasioned to another by his or her want of ordinary care or skill in the management of his or her property or person, except so far as the latter has, willfully or by want of ordinary care, brought the injury upon himself or herself." Fault is only the first half. They must also prove the injury came from this crash.

That is where refusing treatment at the scene actually bites. Civil Code § 3333 sets the measure: "For the breach of an obligation not arising from contract, the measure of damages, except where otherwise expressly provided by this Code, is the amount which will compensate for all the detriment proximately caused thereby, whether it could have been anticipated or not." Proximately caused is the operative phrase. A gap between the crash and the first treatment is the standard argument that something else caused the complaint, or that it is worth less than claimed. It is an argument, not an answer — and it is the kind of argument an insurance adjuster is paid to make on your behalf.

If you were partly at fault, or they were, the claim divides rather than disappearing. In Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978), the California Supreme Court reaffirmed and applied California's pure comparative system, under which recovery is reduced in proportion to a party's own share of fault rather than eliminated. Any share attributable to how the other person drove reduces what they collect.

One thing to be careful about at the end rather than the beginning: Civil Code § 1541 provides that an obligation is extinguished by a release given to the released party by the releasing party, upon a new consideration, or in writing. If this is ever settled, the payment should buy a written release — otherwise nothing stops the claim coming back.

What you can do

1. Send the demand letter and everything else you have received to your auto insurer today, in writing, and keep proof you sent it. Policies impose prompt-notice duties, and this is what your premiums bought.

2. Stop communicating with the claimant and any lawyer for them. Direct all of it to your carrier. Do not offer money, do not apologize in writing, and do not agree to any number.

3. Preserve what already exists — photos, the police report number, dashcam or vehicle-data recordings, repair estimates, and anything recording what the claimant said about their condition at the scene. Do not write out a new account of the crash for anyone but your own lawyer.

4. Ask your insurer for your declarations page so you know your liability limits, and ask whether the demand is inside them.

5. Before you give any statement about how the crash happened — to police, to an investigator, or to the other side — speak with a local criminal-defense attorney.

6. Ask a local attorney to review the demand before you or your insurer respond, and to tell you whether you face exposure above your limits.

7. Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. A personal injury claim against you runs under Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 and its two-year period for injury caused by another's wrongful act or neglect, and Code Civ. Proc. § 352(a) can extend that where the claimant was a minor or lacked legal capacity. A demand letter may also set its own response deadline, which is not a legal deadline but can matter. When the clock started depends on your facts — have a local attorney check the dates before responding.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978) — California Supreme Court
    The Supreme Court reaffirmed and applied California's pure comparative system, under which recovery is reduced in proportion to a party's own share of fault rather than eliminated. Cited because apportionment is what actually reduces this reader's exposure, and Civ. Code § 1714(a)'s text does not state the reduced-not-eliminated rule.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in California

Frequently Asked Questions

Does declining medical treatment at the scene defeat an injury claim in California?

No. Refusing treatment at the scene is common, and injuries that appear the next day can still be compensable. But it gives the defense a real argument on causation and value: Civil Code § 3333 limits damages to the detriment proximately caused, so a gap between the crash and the first treatment invites the argument that something else caused the complaint or that it is worth less than claimed. It weakens the claim; it does not end it.

Is the amount in a demand letter what the driver actually owes?

No. A demand is an opening position. What is recoverable is set by Civil Code § 1714(a), which requires proof that a want of ordinary care caused the injury, and Civil Code § 3333, which measures damages by the detriment proximately caused. California also apportions: *Daly v. General Motors Corp.*, 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978), reaffirmed and applied pure comparative fault, under which recovery is reduced in proportion to the claimant's own share of the blame.

What should a driver do after receiving an injury demand from a crash?

Send it to their own auto insurer immediately and in writing, keeping proof of the transmission, and route all further contact from the claimant to the carrier rather than replying directly. Preserve the records that already exist, and obtain the declarations page to learn the liability limits. If any settlement is eventually made, Civil Code § 1541 is why it should be documented by a written release — a payment without one leaves the obligation alive.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices