1LAW Logo

School Playground Injury and a Delayed Emergency Response

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed June 7, 2024

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

My son fell off a slide at school during a game of tag and broke both arms and suffered a concussion. After the injury happened, the school staff did not follow protocol guidelines for contacting emergency care. Instead, they called me for over 40 minutes while he lay there fighting to stay conscious. When I received the news he was injured, I was at the school in 3 minutes and would call a ride share to take him to the emergency room. I was immediately informed when I arrived that he had suffered a head injury and they were concerned he may have a concussion, not knowing that he had actually broken both arms. I attempted to take him to the ER myself for the head injury; only once taking him to the car, it was so obvious he was in extreme pain that I stopped the car and called him an ambulance. Once I reviewed the school incident report, I have been made aware the school staff is pointing his accident, as well as their own negligent handling.

Attorney Answer

If this is a public school or a school district, the most important thing on this page is a deadline, and it is six months. Cal. Gov't Code § 911.2(a) requires a claim for injury to a person to be presented to the public entity not later than six months after the cause of action accrues. That written claim comes before any lawsuit, and missing it can end a case that would otherwise have been strong. If the school is private, that requirement does not apply and Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1's two years for an injury claim governs instead. Which one you are in is the first thing to settle.

Do not assume your son's age buys extra time. Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 352(a) provides that where a person entitled to bring an action is under the age of majority when the cause of action accrues, the time of that disability does not count against the limitations period. But government-claim deadlines are not tolled in the same way, and when both rules are in play the interaction has to be worked out on the actual dates by a lawyer, quickly.

On the merits, there are two separate failures in what you describe: how the fall happened, and what was done afterward. Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a) is the root of both — everyone is responsible for an injury caused to another by a want of ordinary care in the management of their property or person. Whether a school's departure from its own emergency protocol amounts to that, and what legal duty a school owes in supervising children and in summoning care, is not something a general page can decide; it turns on the protocol itself, the incident report, and the timeline. That is why the report you have already read matters so much.

Expect the school to say your son's own conduct during the game played a part. In California that argument limits a claim; it does not defeat one. This state uses pure comparative fault, and the California Supreme Court reaffirmed that system in Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (Cal. 1978): a claimant's recovery is reduced only to the extent that his own lack of reasonable care contributed to the injury. If a claim succeeds, Cal. Civ. Code § 3333 measures damages as the amount that will compensate for all the detriment proximately caused, which is where the ambulance, the hospital care and the treatment ahead of him belong. And because the injured person is a child, Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 372(a)(1) requires a minor to appear through a guardian, a conservator of the estate, or a guardian ad litem appointed by the court — the claim is brought on his behalf, not in his own name.

What you can do

1. Collect and keep every medical record: the ambulance run sheet, the emergency room chart, imaging, and the follow-up care for both the arms and the head injury.

2. Ask the school in writing for the complete incident report, the emergency-response protocol in force that day, and any statements or notes made about the fall. Keep a copy of your request and the date you sent it.

3. Fix the timeline while it is still recoverable — your phone's call log, texts, and the ride-share record will establish those forty minutes far better than memory will.

4. Photograph the slide, the surface beneath it and the surrounding area if they are still as they were.

5. Speak with a local attorney now about whether the school is a public entity and about presenting a written claim, because Cal. Gov't Code § 911.2(a) allows only six months and that period does not wait for anyone.

6. Ask that attorney about the guardian ad litem requirement in Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 372(a)(1), which applies to any claim brought for a child.

Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. For a public school or district, Cal. Gov't Code § 911.2(a) gives six months to present a written claim — the shortest deadline in this area. For a private school, Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 gives two years for an injury claim. Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 352(a) tolls the running of a limitations period during a minor's disability, but it does not extend a government-claim deadline the same way, so a child's age is not a safety net here. When each clock started depends on your facts, so take the dates to a local attorney immediately rather than working them out from a page.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978) — California Supreme Court
    Cited for the proposition that a claimant's recovery is reduced in proportion to his own lack of reasonable care rather than barred — the point the reader needs against the expected argument that the child caused his own fall. Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a) leads; the statute's text does not state the proportional-reduction rule.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in California

Frequently Asked Questions

How long do you have to bring a claim against a public school in California?

Cal. Gov't Code § 911.2(a) requires a claim for death or for injury to a person or to personal property to be presented to the public entity not later than six months after the cause of action accrues. A public school district is a public entity, so that written claim comes first and a lawsuit follows only afterward. The six months is the shortest deadline in this area of California law and is missed often. Where the injured person is a child, Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 352(a) tolls the running of an ordinary limitations period during a minor's disability, but government-claim deadlines are not tolled in the same way — an area where the dates have to be checked individually rather than assumed.

Who brings an injury claim for a child in California?

An adult does, on the child's behalf. Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 372(a)(1) provides that when a minor is a party, that person must appear either by a guardian or conservator of the estate or by a guardian ad litem appointed by the court. In practice a parent is usually appointed as guardian ad litem for the claim. Separately, Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 352(a) provides that the time of a minor's disability is not part of the limitations period for an ordinary claim, which is why a child's claim can survive longer than an adult's on the same facts — though not where a public-entity claim deadline applies.

Does a child's own part in an accident defeat an injury claim in California?

No. California uses pure comparative fault: a claimant's share of responsibility reduces the recovery in proportion to it, and never eliminates it. Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a) is the statutory root, making everyone responsible for an injury caused to another by a want of ordinary care, and the California Supreme Court reaffirmed the pure comparative system in Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (Cal. 1978), holding that a claimant's recovery is reduced only to the extent that his own lack of reasonable care contributed to the injury. What a child of a given age could reasonably have been expected to do is itself part of that assessment.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices