1LAW Logo

Self-Defense Evidence and Choosing Counsel After a Strangulation Charge

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Managing Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed February 10, 2025

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I was recently imprisoned for strangulation charges during a physical altercation with my now ex. When giving my report I didn’t give all the details of the harm that had been done to me, to not create more issues for my ex. Because of that I became the aggressor and was taken in. I am currently out on a bond. My ex strangled me first, but I kept from the officers that I was about to lose consciousness. This is not the first time he has choked/strangled me, but I never reported him. In 2 of the 3 times he’s done it in the past, there have been witnesses. What should I do to better protect myself, and what is the best lawyer firm to handle this situation?

Does reporting the prior incidents to police help in my situation? My hearing is 8 hours away from where I currently live, should I find a lawyer in the city in which the incident happened?

Attorney Answer

You can present evidence of your ex's prior strangulation of you to support a self-defense claim, but it carries a real strategic cost your attorney needs to weigh with you — and for a criminal case you generally need a lawyer who practices in the county where the charge was filed, not one near where you now live.

California Evidence Code § 1103 lets a criminal defendant offer evidence of the alleged victim's character for violence — by opinion, reputation, or specific instances of conduct — to prove he acted in conformity with it. That is the vehicle for putting his history of strangling you in front of the court. People v. DelRio (2020) 54 Cal.App.5th 47 shows how much weight that vehicle can carry: it is a published California Court of Appeal decision, so it binds California trial courts, and it reversed a murder conviction because the trial court had wrongly excluded significant evidence of the victim's violent character. Applying what it calls the "violent victim rule" under § 1103(a)(1), the court held that such prior acts come in as circumstantial evidence of how the victim behaved at the scene, and that the defendant need not have known about those acts beforehand for them to be admissible. That is real authority to press if a judge is inclined to keep the history out. Two costs still come with it: the judge weighs whether the evidence is more prejudicial than probative, and subdivision (b) then lets the prosecution rebut with evidence of your own character for violence. It is a trade-off, not a free option.

California Penal Code § 273.5 makes it a felony to willfully inflict corporal injury resulting in a traumatic condition on a spouse, cohabitant, fiancé, dating partner, or the other parent of one's child, and subdivision (d) defines "traumatic condition" to expressly include injury resulting from strangulation or suffocation — which is why it is the likely charging statute here. Strangulation can also be charged under a different assault provision, so confirm with your attorney what was actually filed, because the elements shape the defense.

What you can do

1. Retain a criminal defense attorney licensed and regularly appearing in the county where your case is pending, well before your next court date — venue follows the courthouse where the case was filed, not where you live. 2. Tell your attorney everything, including what you did not tell police at the time. Full honesty with your own lawyer only helps your defense. 3. Identify and preserve contact information now for the witnesses to prior incidents, and tell your attorney the dates and details verbally while your memory is fresh. 4. Ask your attorney to weigh specifically whether introducing evidence of your ex's prior violence is worth the risk that the prosecution can then bring in evidence about you. 5. If you cannot afford private counsel in that county, ask the court there to appoint a public defender, or contact that county's bar association for a referral.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • People v. DelRio, (2020) 54 Cal. App. 5th 47 — Cal. Ct. App., 2d Dist., Div. 8
    Evidence Code § 1103(a)(1) — the 'violent victim rule' — lets a criminal defendant introduce a complaining witness's prior acts of violence as circumstantial evidence of how the victim acted at the scene; the trial court errs as a matter of law if it requires the defendant to have known of those prior acts beforehand.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in California

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a domestic violence defendant introduce evidence of the accuser's past violent conduct in California?

Yes. In a criminal case a defendant may generally offer evidence of the alleged victim's character for violence, including specific past instances, to support a self-defense claim. It remains subject to the judge's discretion to exclude evidence that is more prejudicial than probative, and it opens the door to the prosecution introducing similar evidence about the defendant.

What does "traumatic condition" mean under California's domestic violence corporal injury law?

For the felony offense of willfully inflicting corporal injury on a spouse, cohabitant, or similar partner, California law defines "traumatic condition" to expressly include injury resulting from strangulation or suffocation, alongside other physical injuries.

Does a criminal case have to be handled by an attorney in the county where the defendant lives?

No. A criminal case is generally handled in the county where the charge was filed, and the attorney needs to be able to appear regularly in that courthouse — not necessarily where the defendant currently resides.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices