1LAW Logo

Settling Your Own Claim When a Co-Claimant Refuses

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed October 11, 2024

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

So my ex and I were involved in a car accident and we are supposed to receive insurance money, but he is threatening not to agree to the amount of the settlement. Is there a way I can continue without him?

Attorney Answer

It depends on what the money is for, and that is the first thing to pin down. If the settlement is for your own injuries, that claim is yours and you can generally settle and release it without him. If it is a single payment for something the two of you held together — a jointly titled car, or one benefit payable to both of you under one policy — the insurer will usually want you both, and his refusal genuinely does hold things up.

The reason the first case works is that a release runs from the person who gives it. Cal. Civ. Code § 1541 provides: "An obligation is extinguished by a release therefrom given to the debtor or the released party by the creditor or releasing party, upon a new consideration, or in writing, with or without new consideration." What you sign extinguishes your claim. It does not settle his, and his refusal to sign does not settle or block yours. Two people hurt in the same accident normally have two claims, valued separately, even when one adjuster is handling both.

Where it is genuinely one payment, the problem is ownership rather than the accident. Who is on the title, and who the policy names as payee, decides whether the insurer can issue a check to one of you. That is a matter of the title and the policy, not of any statute here, and it is worth confirming before you spend energy on the settlement figure.

The claim-handling regulations give you a way to push for separation. Under Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.7(b), an insurer must accept or deny a claim within forty calendar days of receiving proof of claim — and it may do so in whole or in part, which is exactly what settling one claimant's portion looks like. Under § 2695.7(h), once a claim is accepted, and where necessary once a properly executed release is received, the insurer must tender payment within thirty calendar days; that subsection also provides that where multiple coverage is involved and the payee is known, accepted amounts must be paid within thirty calendar days if payment would terminate the insurer's known liability under that individual coverage, unless impairment of the insured's interests would result. Under § 2695.7(c)(1), if the insurer needs more time it must say so in writing within the forty days and again every thirty days after that. And under Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.5(b), a licensee has fifteen calendar days to give you a complete response to a communication that reasonably calls for one — which makes a written question a better tool here than a phone call.

What you can do

1. Ask the adjuster, in writing, whether your claim can be settled and paid separately from his, and whether the payment is one check naming you both or two separate checks.

2. Ask the adjuster, in writing, to accept and pay the part of the claim that is not in dispute. Under Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.7(b) an insurer may accept a claim in part.

3. Find out whose name is on the vehicle's title and who the policy names, before you argue about the amount. That is what determines whether this is one claim or two.

4. Do not sign a release until you know your own treatment and repairs are finished. A release ends the claim it covers, including for problems that show up later.

5. Never sign his name, endorse a check on his behalf, or agree to anything for him, whatever he says or does not say.

6. Ask a local attorney whether the title and the policy make this one claim or two, and what your options are if the insurer will not separate them.

Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. A stalled settlement does not pause the deadline to bring a claim. Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 gives two years for a claim for personal injury, and Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 338(c)(1) gives three years for damage to a vehicle. Which period applies to which part of what you are owed, and when each one started, depends on your facts — so have a local attorney check the dates now, before a disagreement between the two of you costs you a claim that was never in dispute.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in California

Frequently Asked Questions

Can one accident victim settle their own claim if another person from the same crash refuses?

Usually yes, where each person has a separate claim. Two people injured in the same accident normally have two claims, valued separately, and a release runs only from the person who signs it. Cal. Civ. Code § 1541 provides that an obligation is extinguished by a release given to the released party by the releasing party, upon new consideration or in writing. So one person's signature settles that person's claim and does not settle or block anyone else's. It works differently where the payment is for something the two people owned together, such as a jointly titled vehicle, or where a single policy benefit is payable to both — there the title and the policy decide who has to sign.

What does signing a release do to an accident claim in California?

It ends the claim it covers. Cal. Civ. Code § 1541 provides: "An obligation is extinguished by a release therefrom given to the debtor or the released party by the creditor or releasing party, upon a new consideration, or in writing, with or without new consideration." A release is normally the final step in a claim rather than an early one, because once it is signed the claim is over — including for injuries or damage that turn out to be worse than they first appeared. That is why releases are worth having read by a lawyer before signature rather than after.

How long does a California insurer have to pay a claim it has accepted?

Thirty calendar days. Under Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.7(h), once a claim is accepted in whole or in part, and where necessary once a properly executed release is received, the insurer must tender payment immediately and in no event more than thirty calendar days later. Before that, § 2695.7(b) gives the insurer no more than forty calendar days after receiving proof of claim to accept or deny it, in whole or in part, and § 2695.7(c)(1) requires written notice within that window, and every thirty calendar days after it, if more time is genuinely needed to make a determination.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices