1LAW Logo

Three Separate Injuries and California's Two-Year Deadline

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed March 16, 2022

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

This is about multiple injuries. In October 2018 I was rear-ended and sustained a whiplash injury. In March 2021 I was rear-ended again and sustained another whiplash injury. In July 2021 I was at a baseball game and a drunk fan fell on top of me and rolled over my neck. Since the first accident my cervical spine has begun degrading, causing me pain and inability to work. I have never been compensated for any of my injuries. What can I do?

Attorney Answer

The honest answer is that the 2018 injury is very likely out of time, and the two 2021 incidents are the ones to move on immediately — not next month. Nothing here is a substitute for someone reading your actual records, but you should treat this as urgent rather than as a research project.

California's deadline for a personal injury claim is set by Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1: "Within two years: An action for assault, battery, or injury to, or for the death of, an individual caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another." That period generally starts running at the injury. Each of your three incidents has its own start date, so they do not stand or fall together. On its face, the October 2018 rear-end sits well outside a two-year window measured from the date you wrote. There are narrow circumstances that can postpone or extend a limitations period, and only an attorney looking at your file can tell you whether any of them reaches your situation — but do not plan around that.

The two 2021 incidents are much closer to the line, which is exactly why they cannot wait. That includes the incident at the baseball game. It is not a car crash, but a claim for an injury caused by another person's wrongful act or neglect runs on the same § 335.1 period. Who is responsible there is a separate question — the person who fell on you, and possibly whoever controlled the venue or served the alcohol — and the rules governing venue responsibility and alcohol service are their own body of law, so that piece needs a local attorney's review rather than a general answer.

One thing that worries people in your position unnecessarily: California applies pure comparative fault. Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a) makes everyone responsible for injury caused by their want of ordinary care, "except so far as the latter has, willfully or by want of ordinary care, brought the injury upon himself or herself," and the California Supreme Court in Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978), applied that as a system in which an injured person's recovery is reduced in proportion to their own share of fault rather than eliminated. Being assigned part of the blame does not bar you.

The harder problem is medical, not legal. Where a later injury worsens an earlier one, the responsible parties are not all answerable for the whole condition, and sorting out what each incident contributed to a degenerating cervical spine is done with records and physician opinion. That does not defeat a claim. It means your records are the case.

What you can do

1. Contact a personal injury attorney this week about the two 2021 incidents specifically, and say the dates out loud on the first call. The two-year period in Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 is the reason for the hurry.

2. Gather every medical record and bill for all three incidents, in date order, including imaging reports and any physical therapy or chiropractic notes.

3. Pull together anything showing you missed work or lost income, and for how long.

4. Collect any claim numbers, adjuster letters and emails from any insurer you dealt with after any of the three incidents, even if nothing came of it.

5. Ask your treating providers for the records that connect your current cervical condition to the earlier injuries, rather than summarizing it yourself.

6. Do not sign a release or accept a payment on any of these before an attorney has read it.

Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts with someone who practices in your area is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 generally allows two years for a claim for injury or death, and each of your three incidents has its own starting point. Whether any of them is still open depends on facts a page cannot see, including when your condition was diagnosed and what, if anything, paused a period. Have a local attorney check the actual dates against your records now — do not work it out from the calendar yourself, and do not assume the older one is hopeless without asking.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978) — Cal. Supreme Court
    Cited because the operative point — a share of fault reduces recovery in proportion instead of barring it — is judge-made and is not stated in the text of Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a).

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in California

Frequently Asked Questions

How long do you have to file a personal injury claim in California?

Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 generally allows two years for an action for injury to, or the death of, an individual caused by another's wrongful act or neglect. The period usually starts at the injury. Some situations change it — a claim against a public entity must be presented to that entity within six months under Cal. Gov't Code § 911.2(a), and a person who was a minor or lacked legal capacity when the claim arose gets that time excluded under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 352(a).

Does the deadline for a claim about damage to a vehicle differ from the deadline for an injury claim?

Yes, and people are often caught by the difference. Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 338(c)(1) gives three years for injuring goods or chattels, which is the period that applies to vehicle damage, while Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1 gives two years for personal injury. A single crash can therefore leave one part of a claim open after the other has closed.

Can you still make a claim if an old injury was made worse by a later accident?

Aggravation of a pre-existing condition can be compensable, but each responsible party answers for what their own conduct caused rather than for the entire condition. That allocation is proved with medical records and physician opinion comparing the person's condition before and after each event, which is why contemporaneous treatment records matter far more than a later description of how someone felt.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices