1LAW Logo

Uninsured Motorist Coverage Without a Signed Rejection

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed November 16, 2023

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I thought I had uninsured motorist coverage and was involved in a car accident. Now my insurance company doesn't want to cover it and they say I only had liability. I never signed a rejection form for uninsured motorist. I want to know if I can sue the company or the broker for compensation for this accident.

Attorney Answer

If you never signed a rejection of uninsured motorist coverage, that coverage is very likely in your policy whether or not the declarations page shows it. In California the coverage is included by law unless the insured deletes it in writing, and an insurer that says "you only bought liability" is making a claim it has to be able to prove with a document.

Cal. Ins. Code § 11580.2(a)(1) requires bodily injury liability policies issued or delivered in this state to contain uninsured motorist coverage, or to have it added by endorsement, at limits at least equal to those set in subdivision (m). Coverage can be deleted only by written agreement, on the forms the statute prescribes. The minimum limits in subdivision (m) have changed over time, so what applies to a given policy depends on when that policy was issued or renewed — a point worth pinning down with a lawyer rather than reading off a current summary.

Two California decisions put real weight behind the writing requirement. In Mission Insurance Co. v. Brown, 63 Cal. 2d 508 (1965), the Supreme Court treated the statutory waiver as something that has to be made completely and in the form the statute requires; a partial or informal cutting-back of the coverage is not effective. In Dufresne v. Elite Insurance Co., 26 Cal. App. 3d 916 (1972), the Court of Appeal held that a broker signing on the insured's behalf with only oral authority did not produce a valid written rejection, so the uninsured motorist coverage remained in force. Dufresne discusses an earlier version of the statute — the current text governs your policy — but the principle holds: the rejection has to be the insured's own, and it has to be in writing.

Suing is usually the second step, not the first. The ordinary route is to press the claim under the policy as it stands, and the regulations give you leverage. Under Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.7(b), an insurer must accept or deny a claim within 40 calendar days of receiving proof of claim. Under § 2695.7(b)(1), a denial of a first-party claim must be in writing and must state every basis for it, including the policy provision relied on and how it applies. Under § 2695.7(b)(3), that written denial has to tell you that you may have the matter reviewed by the California Department of Insurance, and give you the unit's address and telephone number. And under § 2695.7(f), before relying on a time limit to deny an uninsured motorist claim, the insurer must give you at least 30 days' advance written notice of the expiration date. A claim against a broker for failing to obtain coverage you asked for is a separate theory with its own requirements, and it belongs in a conversation with a lawyer, not in a call with the insurer.

What you can do

1. Ask the insurer in writing for a complete certified copy of the policy — declarations, endorsements and application — and for any signed uninsured motorist rejection form it claims to hold. Ask for the denial in writing too, with each basis stated.

2. Gather your own papers: the original application, anything the broker gave or emailed you, premium notices, and any earlier declarations pages. An uninsured motorist premium line on an older page is a useful thing to find.

3. Under Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.5(b), a licensee must respond to a claimant's communication within 15 calendar days, so put every request in writing and date it.

4. File a complaint with the California Department of Insurance. It is free, and under Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.5(a) the insurer has 21 calendar days to give the Department a complete written response about the claim.

5. Do not sign a release, cash a settlement check marked final, or give a recorded statement about coverage before a lawyer has read the policy file.

6. Ask a local attorney about both routes at once — the claim under the policy and a claim against the broker. The evidence for each is in the same file.

Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. An injury claim in California runs on the two years given by Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1, and an uninsured motorist claim carries additional timing requirements under Cal. Ins. Code § 11580.2 and under your own policy, which are not the same dates. A claim against a broker has its own period again. Nothing on this page computes yours. Take the policy, the denial and your dates to a local attorney promptly.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Mission Insurance Co. v. Brown, 63 Cal. 2d 508 (1965) — Supreme Court of California
    A statutory waiver of uninsured motorist coverage must be complete and in the form the statute requires; a partial or informal cutting-back is ineffective. Cited for the strict-construction principle that answers the reader's question about an unsigned rejection.
  • Dufresne v. Elite Insurance Co., 26 Cal. App. 3d 916 (1972) — California Court of Appeal
    A broker's signature given on only oral authority is not a valid written rejection, so the uninsured motorist coverage remained in force — the closest fit to the reader's facts. The answer flags that the opinion discusses an earlier version of § 11580.2 and that the current statutory text governs.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in California

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a California insurer deny uninsured motorist coverage when the insured never signed a rejection?

It has a difficult position. Cal. Ins. Code § 11580.2(a)(1) requires bodily injury liability policies issued or delivered in California to include uninsured motorist coverage, or to add it by endorsement, at limits at least equal to those in subdivision (m), and the coverage may be deleted only by written agreement on the forms the statute prescribes. California courts have applied that requirement strictly: in *Mission Insurance Co. v. Brown*, 63 Cal. 2d 508 (1965), the Supreme Court treated the statutory waiver as one that must be made completely and in the required form, and in *Dufresne v. Elite Insurance Co.*, 26 Cal. App. 3d 916 (1972), a broker's signature given on only oral authority was not a valid written rejection, so the coverage remained in force. An insurer asserting a rejection should be asked to produce the signed document.

What must a California insurer do when it denies a claim?

The Fair Claims Settlement Practices regulations set the mechanics. Under Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.7(b), an insurer must accept or deny a claim in whole or in part within 40 calendar days of receiving proof of claim. Under § 2695.7(b)(1), a denial of a first-party claim must be in writing and must list every basis, including the statute, law or policy provision relied on and an explanation of how it applies. Under § 2695.7(b)(3), the written denial must state that the claimant may have the matter reviewed by the California Department of Insurance and give that unit's address and telephone number. And under § 2695.5(b), a licensee has 15 calendar days to respond to a claimant's communication that reasonably calls for a response.

What are the minimum uninsured motorist limits in California?

They are set by Cal. Ins. Code § 11580.2, subdivision (m), and they have changed over time, tracking increases in the state's minimum liability limits. Because of that, the figure that matters for a particular policy is the one in force when that policy was issued or renewed rather than whatever number appears in a current article — a distinction that matters most for accidents that happened before a change took effect. Anyone comparing a denial letter to a limit should confirm the version of the statute that applied to their policy period with a lawyer, and should ask the insurer for a complete certified copy of the policy and all endorsements.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices