What to Do After Being Rear-Ended at an Intersection
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced California attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed September 30, 2023
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
Rear-ended at an intersection. What can I do?
Attorney Answer
A driver who runs into the back of your car at an intersection starts with the fault, and what happens next turns on two things: getting your injuries documented, and the calendar.
Cal. Veh. Code § 21703 provides: "The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicle and the traffic upon, and the condition of, the roadway." Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a) makes that driver responsible for an injury occasioned to another by a want of ordinary care in the management of his or her property or person. It is a strong position but not an automatic one. The usual answers to a rear-end claim are that the car in front stopped suddenly for no apparent reason, that a third vehicle pushed the following car forward in a chain collision, or that a lane change put the front car where it was — and an intersection invites the first and the third.
If any share of the blame were assigned to you, it would reduce your recovery in proportion rather than end it. California is a pure comparative fault state, and the California Supreme Court reaffirmed and applied that system in Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978): a claimant who bears part of the blame has the recovery cut by that share rather than taken away.
Cal. Civ. Code § 3333 measures what you can be paid: "For the breach of an obligation not arising from contract, the measure of damages, except where otherwise expressly provided by this Code, is the amount which will compensate for all the detriment proximately caused thereby, whether it could have been anticipated or not." That reaches treatment costs, lost earnings, and the repair or value of the car, together with related losses such as being without it.
The claim regulations set the pace on the insurance side. Under Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.5(e), an insurer has fifteen calendar days after notice of a claim to acknowledge it, provide the necessary forms and reasonable assistance, and begin any necessary investigation. Under § 2695.7(b) it has forty calendar days after proof of claim to accept or deny in whole or in part, and under § 2695.7(h) thirty calendar days after acceptance to tender payment. Section 2695.7(g) forbids a settlement offer that is unreasonably low, and § 2695.8(e)(1) means no insurer can require you to have the car repaired at a particular shop.
What you can do
1. See a doctor now if anything hurts at all, and describe every symptom. Neck and back symptoms from a rear-end impact commonly appear a day or more later, and an unexplained gap in treatment is the first thing an adjuster points at.
2. Get the traffic collision report number, and a copy of the report when it is released.
3. Photograph both vehicles, the damage and the intersection, and write down what you remember while it is fresh — the signal or sign sequence, the lane you were in, and any witnesses.
4. Report the claim to the other driver's insurer and to your own, and ask your own insurer for your declarations page so you know which coverages you carry.
5. Keep every bill, record and receipt, and a note of the work you missed.
6. Do not give a recorded statement about your injuries before you have been examined, and do not accept a payment described as final until you know what your treatment involves.
7. If an insurer misses the timelines above, file a complaint with the California Department of Insurance. Under Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.7(b)(3), a written denial has to tell you about that review right.
8. Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.
⏱ Time limits apply. A claim for injury to a person runs under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1, which allows two years, and a claim for damage to the vehicle under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 338(c)(1), which allows three. The injury period is the shorter of the two and the one people miss. When each began depends on your facts, so have a local attorney check the dates against your own file rather than working from a general rule.
Cases Cited
Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.
- Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978) — California Supreme Court
Cited because the text of Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a) does not itself say that a partly-at-fault plaintiff's recovery is reduced in proportion rather than eliminated; Daly is the Supreme Court reaffirming and applying California's pure comparative system. Cited as a reaffirmation and application, not as the source of the doctrine.
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in California
- File or look up a case through the California Courts.
- Get free civil legal help from LawHelpCA.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the driver behind automatically at fault for a rear-end collision in California?
Not automatically, though that driver starts from a difficult position. Cal. Veh. Code § 21703 forbids following another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of that vehicle and the traffic and roadway conditions, and Cal. Civ. Code § 1714(a) makes a driver responsible for injury caused by a want of ordinary care. The recognized answers are a sudden and unexplained stop by the car in front, a chain collision in which a following vehicle pushed the middle car forward, and a disputed lane change that put the front car in the path. Fault can be shared: under Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal. 3d 725 (1978), a claimant partly to blame has the recovery reduced by that share rather than eliminated.
Why does a delay in getting medical treatment matter after a car accident?
Because the records are the proof. Cal. Civ. Code § 3333 measures damages as the amount that will compensate for all the detriment proximately caused by the wrong, and what connects an injury to a collision is generally the medical documentation of it. Neck and back symptoms often appear a day or more after an impact, and an unexplained gap between the crash and the first visit gives an insurer an argument that something else caused the problem. Getting examined promptly and describing every symptom protects the claim as well as the person.
Can an insurer require a claimant to use a particular repair shop in California?
No. Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2695.8(e)(1) forbids an insurer from requiring that an automobile be repaired at a specific repair shop, and § 2695.8(e)(2) restricts steering a claimant away from a shop already chosen. Section 2695.8(f) requires an insurer's estimate to allow repairs to be made in accordance with accepted trade standards, and where the claimant obtains a higher estimate the insurer must pay the difference, name a shop that will do the work for its estimate, or reasonably adjust the estimate and explain each adjustment. Section 2695.7(g) separately forbids a settlement offer that is unreasonably low.