1LAW Logo

A utility operator's personal liability for re-energizing downed lines

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Florida attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed July 5, 2021

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I work for an electric utility, operating its distribution system: everything from the low side of the substation step-down transformers (12,000 volts) out to the power meters at customers' homes and businesses. Sometimes a substation circuit breaker trips automatically, cutting power to every customer it feeds. Usually the cause is temporary, like a lightning strike or a tree branch falling on the wires. The breaker stays open for roughly 30 to 45 seconds and then closes again automatically. If the condition has cleared, it stays closed; if not, it trips again, waits another 30 to 45 seconds, and closes again. If the condition still has not cleared, it trips a third time and locks out, staying open. My employer's direction is that I manually close the breaker after it has tripped and closed three times and locked out. They call this "giving the breaker a fourth shot." Suppose the breaker tripped because a vehicle crash broke a utility pole and dropped wires onto the vehicle. If I manually close the breaker that fourth time and energize the wires lying on the vehicle, am I legally responsible if the driver or passengers are injured when the vehicle is electrified? I would not have known the trip was caused by a crash. All I would know is that the breaker operated and locked out, and that company policy requires me to close it for a fourth "shot."

Attorney Answer

Possibly, and the first thing that decides it is who owns the utility you work for. If it is a city-owned or other government utility, Florida law generally bars suing you personally for an act within the scope of your job unless you acted in bad faith, with malicious purpose, or with wanton and willful disregard of safety; the claim runs against the utility instead. If it is an investor-owned company, an employee who personally commits a negligent act can be held liable for it even while doing the job, although the employer is ordinarily answerable as well.

Which kind of utility you work for. Florida's utility law names three kinds of electric utility. Fla. Stat. § 366.02(4):

(4) “Electric utility” means any municipal electric utility, investor-owned electric utility, or rural electric cooperative which owns, maintains, or operates an electric generation, transmission, or distribution system within the state.

Calling a company a “public utility” does not settle which kind it is. Whether a cooperative or a utility authority is treated like a government body for this purpose is a question for a lawyer who knows how yours is organized.

A government utility. Fla. Stat. § 768.28(9)(a) provides:

(9)(a) An officer, employee, or agent of the state or of any of its subdivisions may not be held personally liable in tort or named as a party defendant in any action for any injury or damage suffered as a result of any act, event, or omission of action in the scope of her or his employment or function, unless such officer, employee, or agent acted in bad faith or with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful disregard of human rights, safety, or property.

The same paragraph makes a suit against the government entity the exclusive remedy unless the act was committed in bad faith, with malicious purpose, or with wanton and willful disregard of human rights, safety, or property. The state's “subdivisions” include counties and municipalities, and corporations primarily acting as instrumentalities or agencies of the state, counties, or municipalities (§ 768.28(2), Fla. Stat.).

A private utility. A Florida appeals court has held that a company's officers and agents are personally liable for torts they personally commit, even when acting within the scope of their employment: White-Wilson Medical Center v. Dayta Consultants, Inc., 486 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). The Florida Supreme Court has said that power companies, while not insurers, must shoulder a greater-than-usual duty of care in proportion to the greater-than-usual zone of risk of their business: McCain v. Florida Power Corp., 593 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 1992). That case concerned a company's duty, not an individual operator's. The same decision explains that a duty arises where conduct creates a foreseeable zone of risk, while whether the particular injury was foreseeable is a question of proximate cause, ordinarily for the jury.

The company's procedure. A written company directive is a fact a court would weigh, but how much it would count depends on what the procedure required and on the circumstances of a particular close. That question needs a lawyer with the procedure in hand. Your employer will ordinarily be answerable as well for negligence in the course of your work, and you can ask it whether it defends and indemnifies employees for claims arising from their work.

What you can do

1. Find out how your employer is organized: a city or county utility, an investor-owned company, a cooperative, or an authority.

2. Get a copy of the written switching procedure that calls for the fourth close, and keep it.

3. Ask your employer whether it defends and indemnifies employees for claims arising from operating decisions made under company procedure.

4. If you are represented by a union, ask your representative how the contract treats claims against operators.

5. Raise any safety concern about closing a locked-out breaker through your supervisor or the company's safety program.

6. Even if you are handling this yourself, you would be best served by a brief phone consultation with a local Florida attorney before you act. Most lawyers offer a short initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts — and on how your court actually handles this — is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. For an injury on or after March 24, 2023, a negligence claim must be brought within two years under § 95.11(5)(a), Fla. Stat. A claim against a government utility also requires presenting the claim in writing to the agency within three years after it accrues, and a denial, before suit under § 768.28(6)(a). If you are ever named in a claim, the papers carry their own deadline to respond, so contact your employer and a lawyer at once.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • White-Wilson Medical Center v. Dayta Consultants, Inc., 486 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) — District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
    A corporation's officers and agents are personally liable for torts they personally commit, even within the scope of their employment.
  • McCain v. Florida Power Corp., 593 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 1992) — Supreme Court of Florida
    Power companies, while not insurers, owe a greater-than-usual duty of care in proportion to the greater-than-usual zone of risk; duty turns on a foreseeable zone of risk, and the foreseeability of the specific injury is a proximate-cause question.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in Florida

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a Florida government employee be sued personally for negligence on the job?

Generally not. Under Fla. Stat. § 768.28(9)(a), an officer, employee, or agent of the state or one of its subdivisions may not be held personally liable in tort or named as a defendant for an act in the scope of employment unless the employee acted in bad faith, with malicious purpose, or with wanton and willful disregard of human rights, safety, or property. The claim runs against the government entity.

Can an employee of a private company be personally liable for negligence at work in Florida?

Yes. A Florida appeals court has held that a company's officers and agents are personally liable for torts they personally commit, even when acting within the scope of their employment (White-Wilson Medical Center v. Dayta Consultants, Inc., 486 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)). The employer is ordinarily answerable as well.

What duty of care does a Florida power company owe?

The Florida Supreme Court has said that power companies are not insurers but must shoulder a greater-than-usual duty of care in proportion to the greater-than-usual zone of risk of their business (McCain v. Florida Power Corp., 593 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 1992)).

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices