1LAW Logo

Chain-Reaction Crash and a Second Opinion on Causation

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Florida attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed April 4, 2023

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I was sitting at a red light, then a car supposedly turned and made a truck coming from my left lock up his brakes and hit me in the driver's door, where I had to be flown to the hospital. So my lawyer says I basically have no case because it wasn't the truck that hit me fault, it was the car that turned. Is my lawyer doing the right thing?

Attorney Answer

No page can tell you whether your lawyer is right. They have the crash report, the witnesses and the vehicles; this page has four sentences. What a page can tell you is that "the truck driver was not at fault" does not, on its own, mean there is no case — and that the questions worth putting to your lawyer, in writing, are short and specific.

Here is why that reasoning is incomplete as stated. Florida does not treat a crash as having exactly one responsible driver. Fault is divided among everyone whose negligence contributed to it, and § 768.81(3) makes each defendant's liability for damages several rather than joint — which is exactly why every contributing driver matters, not just the one whose vehicle made contact. If the turning car caused the sequence, that driver is a potential defendant. The truck driver's conduct is a separate question, and the two do not cancel each other out.

The practical problem here is usually not the legal theory. It is whether the turning driver was ever identified, and whether there is coverage. If that car left and was never traced, the claim does not simply evaporate — that is one of the situations uninsured motorist coverage exists for. Section 627.727(1) requires uninsured motorist coverage in every Florida policy that provides bodily-injury liability coverage, and the statute states its own exception: "However, the coverage required under this section is not applicable when, or to the extent that, an insured named in the policy makes a written rejection of the coverage on behalf of all insureds under the policy." So establish what UM coverage exists on your own policy and any household policy covering you.

On the money side, being flown to a hospital means the bills passed the no-fault layer quickly. Section 627.736(1) caps personal injury protection at $10,000 in medical and disability benefits, subject to the 14-day initial-treatment condition in § 627.736(1)(a). Injuries of that severity also put § 627.737(2) in play: pain-and-suffering damages require significant and permanent loss of an important bodily function, permanent injury within a reasonable degree of medical probability other than scarring or disfigurement, significant and permanent scarring or disfigurement, or death. Whether a particular injury meets that is a medical question. And economic losses beyond PIP are not gated by that threshold at all.

One more thing that could matter a great deal: the comparative-fault rule in Florida changed on March 24, 2023, and which version applies depends on your accident date. For accidents on or after that date, § 768.81(2) reduces an award in proportion to a claimant's own fault "but does not bar recovery, subject to subsection (6)," and § 768.81(6) bars recovery for a party more than 50 percent at fault for their own harm. For accidents before that date, § 768.81(2) provided that contributory fault "diminishes proportionately the amount awarded as economic and noneconomic damages for an injury attributable to the claimant's contributory fault, but does not bar recovery" — with no percentage cliff. Sitting stopped at a red light, none of this may touch you. Which regime governs is a lawyer's question.

What you can do

1. Ask your lawyer three questions in writing, and ask for written answers: was the turning driver identified; has a claim been opened under any uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage available to you; and what is the deadline in your case.

2. Ask your own insurer, and anyone in your household whose policy might cover you, for the declarations pages showing UM limits.

3. Get a second opinion from another Florida injury lawyer. Most injury lawyers will review a file at no charge, and asking does not require you to end anything.

4. Keep every medical record and bill, including the air transport, and note every day of work missed.

5. Ask a lawyer about the deadline before you do anything else. Of everything on this list, it is the one that cannot be repaired later.

6. Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts with someone who can ask you questions is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. A claim from a crash is a negligence claim, and in Florida the deadline depends on the date of the accident. For accidents on or after March 24, 2023, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(5)(a) allows two years for an action founded on negligence. For accidents before that date, the former four-year period under § 95.11 applied. Which one covers you turns on when the crash happened, and other facts can change the answer. Have a Florida attorney read the dates on your file before you rely on any of this. This page does not calculate your deadline.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in Florida

Frequently Asked Questions

Can more than one driver be responsible for a single crash in Florida?

Yes. Florida allocates fault among everyone whose negligence contributed to a crash, and under Fla. Stat. § 768.81(3) a defendant's liability for damages is several rather than joint — each pays according to that defendant's own percentage of fault. A driver whose vehicle never touched the injured person can still be a defendant if that driver's conduct set the sequence in motion. That is also why the question of who has been identified, and who has coverage, often matters more in practice than the legal theory.

What happens when the driver who caused a crash was never identified?

The claim does not automatically end. Uninsured motorist coverage exists in part for that situation. Fla. Stat. § 627.727(1) requires uninsured motorist coverage in every Florida policy providing bodily-injury liability coverage, and provides that the requirement does not apply "when, or to the extent that, an insured named in the policy makes a written rejection of the coverage on behalf of all insureds under the policy." The first step is finding every policy that might cover the injured person and checking the declarations page for that coverage and its limits.

Is it acceptable to get a second opinion while already represented by a lawyer?

Yes. Consulting another lawyer for a second view on a case is ordinary, and most injury lawyers will look at a file without charge. Asking for a second opinion is not a decision to change lawyers; it is a way of testing whether the reasoning behind an assessment holds up against the file. If a second opinion differs, the useful next step is to ask both lawyers the same specific questions — about who has been identified as a defendant, what coverage has been pursued, and what deadline applies.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices