1LAW Logo

Getting back property held as collateral after an informal crash deal

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Florida attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed November 6, 2023

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

After a crash, the other driver and I both wanted to handle it without insurance. We didn't call the police, and we both left. The other driver took my camera as collateral. Afterward we both ended up going through insurance anyway, but the other driver refuses to give the camera back. How do I get it back?

Attorney Answer

Ask for the camera back in writing, and ask for the camera itself, not money. If the other driver refuses, Florida law lets you go to court to recover personal property someone is wrongfully holding, along with damages for the time it was held. Whether keeping it is wrongful depends on what the two of you agreed: if the camera secured payment for damage that the insurance claims have now covered, the reason to keep it may be gone; if the other driver says something under your private deal is still owed, the dispute is about that agreement.

Refusing to return property can be conversion. A Florida appeals court has described conversion as an unauthorized act that deprives another of property permanently or for an indefinite time, and has held that it can be shown by a demand for the property and a refusal: Mayo v. Allen, 973 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). The owners in that case lost, in part because their letter asked for a money settlement rather than the return of the property, so it was not a demand at all. Ask for the camera.

When a refusal may be justified. Not every refusal is conversion. A Florida appeals court applied the principle that a holder's refusal avoids conversion only if it rests on a disclosed reason that asserts no claim inconsistent with the owner's rights, and the holders in that case lost: Goodrich v. Malowney, 157 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963). If the other driver says money is still owed under your private deal, whether that justifies keeping the camera turns on what you actually agreed and on whether insurance has now paid for the damage the camera was meant to secure.

Going to court. Fla. Stat. § 78.01 provides:

Any person whose personal property is wrongfully detained by any other person or officer may have a writ of replevin to recover said personal property and any damages sustained by reason of the wrongful taking or detention as herein provided.

Depending on the camera's value, a claim like this can often be brought in small claims court.

What you can do

1. Send the other driver a short written request, by text or letter, asking for the camera itself by a reasonable date, and keep a copy.

2. Keep every message about the deal you made at the scene and about the camera.

3. Keep both insurers' claim numbers and any payment records; they show whether the damage the camera secured has been paid.

4. If the other driver still refuses, ask a Florida lawyer, or the clerk's office for small claims, about filing to recover the camera.

5. Even if you are handling this yourself, you would be best served by a brief phone consultation with a local Florida attorney before you act. Most lawyers offer a short initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts — and on how your court actually handles this — is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3) sets a four-year period for, among others:

(g) An action for taking, detaining, or injuring personal property.
(h) An action to recover specific personal property.

The period runs from when the claim arose, which a lawyer can pin down with you — no page can compute it for you.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Mayo v. Allen, 973 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) — District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
    Conversion is an unauthorized act depriving another of property permanently or for an indefinite time, and may be shown by demand and refusal; a letter seeking money rather than the property's return was no demand, and the owners lost.
  • Goodrich v. Malowney, 157 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963) — District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
    A refusal to return property avoids conversion only if it is qualified by a disclosed reason that asserts no claim inconsistent with the owner's rights; the holders' refusal there did not qualify.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in Florida

Frequently Asked Questions

What is conversion of personal property in Florida?

A Florida appeals court has described conversion as an unauthorized act that deprives another of property permanently or for an indefinite time, and has held that it may be shown by a demand for the property and a refusal (Mayo v. Allen, 973 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)). A demand for money is not a demand for the property.

How do I get my property back from someone in Florida?

Ask for the property itself, in writing. If the person refuses, Fla. Stat. § 78.01 lets a person whose personal property is wrongfully detained seek a writ of replevin to recover it, along with damages for the wrongful taking or detention.

How long do I have to sue to recover personal property in Florida?

Four years. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3) sets a four-year period for an action for taking, detaining, or injuring personal property, and for an action to recover specific personal property.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices