1LAW Logo

Proving a Store Knew About the Spill That Caused Your Fall

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Florida attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed July 15, 2024

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I was at a discount store recently, and I went to the counter to pay for my stuff, but I had to run out to my car because I had forgotten my card. There was an older gentleman at the counter paying for stuff, and when I went to walk out of the store I slipped and fell, and I hurt my foot and my wrist and my butt, because I fell straight on my butt, but I tried to catch myself with my hands. The worker helped me up and said she didn't see anything wet on the floor, but they have big oil puddles and spots in their parking lot, and that may be what I stepped in. I'm just trying to find some advice. I filled out no paperwork or anything. I know it's on camera, because the worker hollered at another woman that was in the back, and she yelled back, "Yeah, I saw it."

Attorney Answer

You may have a claim, but Florida makes you prove one thing that the store will fight hardest on: that it knew, or should have known, about whatever was on the floor. What you already know about the parking lot, and what the camera shows, are exactly the evidence that question turns on.

Florida has a statute written for this fact pattern. Fla. Stat. § 768.0755(1) provides: "If a person slips and falls on a transitory foreign substance in a business establishment, the injured person must prove that the business establishment had actual or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition and should have taken action to remedy it." The same subsection then says how constructive knowledge can be shown: "Constructive knowledge may be proven by circumstantial evidence showing that: (a) The dangerous condition existed for such a length of time that, in the exercise of ordinary care, the business establishment should have known of the condition; or (b) The condition occurred with regularity and was therefore foreseeable."

Read that against your facts. The worker said she saw nothing wet, which is the store's first line: no substance, no knowledge. But you have described oil puddles and spots in the parking lot that customers walk through on the way in. If oil from the lot is regularly tracked onto that floor, the second route to constructive knowledge, a condition that "occurred with regularity and was therefore foreseeable," is the one your case would run on. That is a matter of proof: how long the lot has been like that, whether anyone had complained, what the store's own inspection and cleaning records show, and what the camera recorded on the floor before you stepped there. Subsection (2) of the same statute preserves the ordinary common-law duty of a business to keep its premises reasonably safe, so the parking-lot condition itself is not off the table.

Your own conduct will come up. You were hurrying back in. Florida divides fault by percentage. Fla. Stat. § 768.81(2) provides: "In a negligence action, contributory fault chargeable to the claimant diminishes proportionately the amount awarded as economic and noneconomic damages for an injury attributable to the claimant's contributory fault, but does not bar recovery, subject to subsection (6)." And subsection (6) provides: "In a negligence action to which this section applies, any party found to be greater than 50 percent at fault for his or her own harm may not recover any damages." Because your fall happened in 2024, that current text is the rule for you: a share of fault reduces your recovery, and a share above half ends it.

The camera footage is the most important thing in this case and the most perishable. Stores overwrite video on a schedule that is often measured in days.

What you can do

1. Get your foot, wrist and hip examined now, and tell the provider how you fell. The medical record made this week is both treatment and the proof that the fall caused the injury.

2. Ask the store, in writing, to preserve the video of the fall and of the entrance area for the hour before it, and to record the incident. Keep a copy of what you send and when.

3. Photograph the parking lot oil spots and the entrance while they still look the way they did that day.

4. Write down the names or descriptions of the worker who helped you and the worker who said she saw it. Those are the store's own witnesses to what was on the floor.

5. Do not give a recorded statement to the store's claims office or insurer before you have spoken to a lawyer. You have reported the fall; that is enough for now.

6. Talk to a local personal-injury attorney soon. Most take these cases on a contingency fee and offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts, and on how store cases are handled in your county, is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. For a fall in 2024, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(5)(a) requires an action founded on negligence to be brought within two years. Before March 24, 2023, the period for these claims was four years; a 2023 law shortened it for later accidents, and yours falls on the shorter side of that line. Whether the period has run depends on your dates. Have a Florida attorney confirm them, and do not treat two years as time to wait: the video will be gone long before then.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in Florida

Frequently Asked Questions

What does a customer have to prove after slipping on something in a Florida store?

Under Fla. Stat. § 768.0755(1), a person who slips on a transitory foreign substance in a business establishment must prove the business had actual or constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition and should have taken action to remedy it. Constructive knowledge can be shown circumstantially: the condition existed long enough that ordinary care would have found it, or it occurred with regularity and was therefore foreseeable. The statute preserves the business's ordinary common-law duty of care as well.

Does it matter that a store employee says the floor was not wet?

It matters, but it is not the end of the case. The employee's statement is evidence for the store, and the customer's evidence is what the camera shows, the store's inspection and cleaning records, prior complaints, and the condition of the approaches to the entrance, such as a parking lot that regularly leaves oil on customers' shoes. Preserving the video promptly is what keeps that question open.

If the person who fell was partly careless, can they still recover in Florida?

For accidents on or after March 24, 2023, Fla. Stat. § 768.81(2) reduces the award in proportion to the claimant's share of fault, and § 768.81(6) bars recovery entirely if the claimant is found more than 50 percent at fault. For accidents before that date, Florida applied pure comparative fault, which reduced recovery proportionally but did not bar it at any percentage. Which rule applies depends on when the fall happened.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices