Rear-End Suit When the Police Report Blames the Other Driver
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Florida attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed May 24, 2023
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
A car stopped in the middle of traffic and got rear-ended, and I'm getting sued. The police report says they failed to yield. What can I do?
Attorney Answer
A police report is not a verdict, and in Florida the driver who strikes another vehicle from behind starts out presumed negligent — so yes, you can be sued and can be held liable even when the officer wrote that the other driver failed to yield. The better news is that the presumption can be rebutted, and a car stopped in the middle of moving traffic is one of the classic ways to rebut it.
The driving rule is statutory. Fla. Stat. § 316.0895(1) provides: "The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicles and the traffic upon, and the condition of, the highway." That sets the standard a jury measures a following driver against. It says nothing about who wins a lawsuit.
The rule that decides rear-end cases is judge-made. In Birge v. Charron, 107 So. 3d 350 (Fla. 2012), the Florida Supreme Court held that the rear driver is presumed negligent, that the presumption is rebuttable — by evidence such as a mechanical failure, a sudden and unexpected stop, or an illegal or unexpected stop by the lead vehicle — and that once it is rebutted the case is decided under ordinary comparative-fault principles rather than automatically against the rear driver. In Clampitt v. D.J. Spencer Sales, 786 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 2001), the court addressed the abrupt-stop version of that rebuttal: a stop at a place and in a manner the following driver had no reason to anticipate.
The report itself carries less weight than people expect. Florida also protects what drivers say to the officer who prepares it. Under Fla. Stat. § 316.066(4), a crash report made by a person involved in the crash, and any statement that person made to an officer for the purpose of completing it, is without prejudice to the person reporting: "Such report or statement may not be used as evidence in any trial, civil or criminal." That subsection carries exceptions: an officer may testify to such statements in a criminal trial where the privilege against self-incrimination is not violated, and breath, urine and blood test results are not confidential.
Shared fault matters, and the rule changed. For a crash before March 24, 2023, Fla. Stat. § 768.81(2) provided: "In a negligence action, contributory fault chargeable to the claimant diminishes proportionately the amount awarded as economic and noneconomic damages for an injury attributable to the claimant's contributory fault, but does not bar recovery." For a crash on or after that date, the Legislature added § 768.81(6): "In a negligence action to which this section applies, any party found to be greater than 50 percent at fault for his or her own harm may not recover any damages. This subsection does not apply to an action for damages for personal injury or wrongful death arising out of medical negligence pursuant to chapter 766." Which version governs your crash depends on when it happened, and that question belongs with a lawyer.
What you can do
1. Ask a Florida lawyer about the response deadline printed on your suit papers, and do it now. A missed deadline can produce a judgment with no hearing on fault at all.
2. Send every page you were served to your auto insurer immediately. Liability coverage usually carries a duty to defend, which means the insurer hires and pays the lawyer.
3. Preserve the evidence you control: photographs, the vehicle, dashcam or phone video, and the names of anyone who saw the car stop.
4. Request the complete crash report and ask the agency about body-camera or traffic-camera video, which is often overwritten within weeks.
5. Send the other side's adjuster or lawyer to your insurer instead of answering questions yourself.
6. Ask a local lawyer whether the stopped-in-traffic facts support a rebuttal defense, and whether you have a claim of your own.
Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.
⏱ Time limits apply. The deadline for a negligence claim from this crash runs from the crash date, and the period depends on which side of March 24, 2023 that date falls on: claims accruing on or after it get two years under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(5)(a), and claims accruing before it got the four-year period the former version of § 95.11 set. The deadline to respond to a lawsuit already filed against you is far shorter and is set by court rule, not by that statute. Have a Florida attorney check both against your actual dates — no page can compute them for you.
Cases Cited
Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.
- Birge v. Charron, 107 So. 3d 350 (Fla. 2012) — Supreme Court of Florida
The rear driver is presumed negligent; the presumption is rebuttable by evidence such as a mechanical failure or a sudden, unexpected or illegal stop by the lead vehicle, and comparative fault governs once it is rebutted. - Clampitt v. D.J. Spencer Sales, 786 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 2001) — Supreme Court of Florida
The abrupt-stop rebuttal: a stop at a place and in a manner the following driver had no reason to anticipate.
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in Florida
- File or look up a case through the Florida State Courts.
- Get free civil legal help from FloridaLawHelp.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a police report decide who is liable for a crash in Florida?
No. An officer's opinion about fault is not a ruling, and civil liability is decided by a judge or jury on the evidence. Florida also limits the report's use: under Fla. Stat. § 316.066(4), a crash report made by a person involved in the crash, and statements that person made to complete it, may not be used as evidence in a civil or criminal trial, subject to the exceptions in that subsection. A report is a starting point for investigation, not the answer.
Is the rear driver always at fault in a Florida rear-end collision?
No. Florida presumes the rear driver was negligent, and Fla. Stat. § 316.0895(1) forbids following more closely than is reasonable and prudent. But the presumption is rebuttable. In Birge v. Charron, 107 So. 3d 350 (Fla. 2012), the Florida Supreme Court recognized rebuttal evidence such as a mechanical failure or a sudden, unexpected or illegal stop by the lead vehicle, and held that comparative fault then governs. Clampitt v. D.J. Spencer Sales, 786 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 2001), addressed the abrupt-stop rebuttal.
Can a driver who is partly at fault still recover damages in Florida?
It depends on the crash date. For crashes before March 24, 2023, Fla. Stat. § 768.81(2) reduced an award in proportion to the claimant's own fault but did not bar recovery at any percentage. For crashes on or after that date, § 768.81(6) bars recovery entirely by a party found more than 50 percent at fault for his or her own harm, except in medical-negligence actions under chapter 766. Below that line, the proportional reduction still applies.