Uninsured Permissive Driver Sued After a Left-Turn Crash
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Florida attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed November 14, 2023
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
I wanted to ask for advice on this issue I'm having and don't know what to do. I was in an accident last year in November. I was turning left on a light, but there was a big white cargo truck and it was obstructing my view, and I didn't see any cars coming, so I turned and a lady T-boned me. When the police got to the scene, none of us were given a ticket. I did not have insurance at the time because I was moving out of my mom's house, so I was looking for insurance and didn't have any at the time. I did use my mom's car to drive that day of the accident, but I was not under her insurance because I was not living with her. So now I believe the lady that was in the accident with me is suing my mom's insurance company and us. I was working with a large personal injury law firm, but they said they couldn't receive a higher amount than 10,000 for my injuries, so they were not going to continue working with my case, and now me and my mom are stuck because they are asking me to sign a release so I can't sue or do anything legal against the other lady in the accident and I will get the 10,000 dollars, but I don't know what to do. Because if I sign it then I'm not going to be able to defend myself in court and I'm going to have to pay all the money she will sue me for. What should I do? Do I need a civil lawyer? Or do I sign the release? We don't know what to do and we are desperate for an answer.
Attorney Answer
Yes — a driver who causes a crash can be sued personally, and not having insurance does not shield you; it removes the shield. But the release in front of you and the claim against you are two different things, and no one should sign the first without a lawyer reading it against the second.
Two separate exposures sit in your question. The first is yours. Personal liability comes from your own driving, not from whose car you were in — a left turn across traffic with an obstructed view is exactly the fact pattern the other side will build on. The second is your mother's. Under Florida's dangerous instrumentality doctrine, a vehicle owner is generally responsible for the negligent operation of the car by someone the owner let drive it: the Florida Supreme Court held in Aurbach v. Gallina, 753 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 2000), that an owner who entrusts a vehicle to another is vicariously liable for its negligent operation, and that the person held liable must have an identifiable property interest in the vehicle. The rule dates to Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Anderson, 86 So. 629 (Fla. 1920). That is why she is named alongside you.
What the Legislature did do is cap that owner exposure. Fla. Stat. § 324.021(9)(b)3. provides: "The owner who is a natural person and loans a motor vehicle to any permissive user shall be liable for the operation of the vehicle or the acts of the operator in connection therewith only up to $100,000 per person and up to $300,000 per incident for bodily injury and up to $50,000 for property damage. If the permissive user of the motor vehicle is uninsured or has any insurance with limits less than $500,000 combined property damage and bodily injury liability, the owner shall be liable for up to an additional $500,000 in economic damages only arising out of the use of the motor vehicle." Because you were uninsured, that second sentence is in play, reduced by whatever is actually recovered from you. The cap does not cover an owner's own negligence — for example, a claim that she should not have let you drive at all.
Your own injury claim runs on a different track. Your accident was in November of the prior year, before Florida changed its shared-fault rule. For accidents before March 24, 2023, Fla. Stat. § 768.81(2) provided: "EFFECT OF CONTRIBUTORY FAULT. — In a negligence action, contributory fault chargeable to the claimant diminishes proportionately the amount awarded as economic and noneconomic damages for an injury attributable to the claimant's contributory fault, but does not bar recovery." Under that rule your own share of fault reduced what you could recover but did not wipe it out. The Legislature changed that in 2023 for later accidents, and which version governs an older crash is a question for a lawyer, not a page.
What you can do
1. Give every court paper, letter and release to your mother's insurance company immediately, and keep a copy of everything you send.
2. Do not sign the release, or anything else, until a Florida attorney has read it and told you what it does and does not give up.
3. Say nothing about the crash to the other driver, her lawyer or any insurer except through counsel, and do not write out your own account of the accident for anyone but your own attorney.
4. Collect and keep the crash report, the photos, your medical records and the repair records in one place.
5. Ask a Florida attorney about the owner cap in § 324.021(9)(b)3. and whether the truck that blocked your view changes the fault picture — and if anyone raises a citation or charge about driving uninsured, ask a defense lawyer before you answer.
6. Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.
⏱ Time limits apply. A negligence claim from an accident before March 24, 2023 ran under the former four-year period in Fla. Stat. § 95.11; the Legislature shortened it to two years for later accidents. Separately, once you are sued, the papers themselves carry a short deadline to respond, and missing it can cost the case without a hearing. Which dates control here depends on your facts — get them in front of a Florida attorney now.
Cases Cited
Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.
- Aurbach v. Gallina, 753 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 2000) — Supreme Court of Florida
An owner who entrusts a vehicle to another is vicariously liable for its negligent operation under the dangerous instrumentality doctrine; an identifiable property interest in the vehicle is required. - Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Anderson, 86 So. 629 (Fla. 1920) — Supreme Court of Florida
Origin of Florida's dangerous instrumentality doctrine — cited for pedigree only.
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in Florida
- File or look up a case through the Florida State Courts.
- Get free civil legal help from FloridaLawHelp.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a driver who had no insurance be sued personally after a crash in Florida?
Yes. Liability for a crash comes from the driver's own negligence, and an uninsured driver simply has no carrier standing between them and the claim. Florida also does not bar an uninsured driver from bringing their own injury claim on that basis alone. Being uninsured affects who pays, not who is responsible.
Is a Florida car owner responsible when someone else was driving?
Generally yes. Florida's dangerous instrumentality doctrine, a judge-made rule, holds a vehicle owner responsible for the negligent operation of the vehicle by a permissive user. The exposure is limited by statute: Fla. Stat. § 324.021(9)(b)3. caps a natural-person lender at $100,000 per person and $300,000 per incident for bodily injury and $50,000 for property damage, with up to an additional $500,000 in economic damages if the permissive user was uninsured or thinly insured. The cap does not reach the owner's own negligence, and it does not apply to commercial owners.
How did shared fault work in Florida for accidents before March 24, 2023?
For accidents before that date, Fla. Stat. § 768.81(2) provided that contributory fault chargeable to the claimant diminishes the award proportionately "but does not bar recovery." A claimant partly at fault recovered a reduced amount at any percentage of fault. For accidents on or after March 24, 2023, the Legislature added a rule barring recovery by a party found more than 50 percent at fault. Which version applies to an older crash is a legal question worth asking a Florida attorney.