When an Officer's Fault Finding Changes After an Admission
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Florida attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed December 2023
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
I was rear-ended today from the back. Two community officers handled the report. Initially they said 'No Fault,' since they could not determine who was right or wrong. Once advising them the man who hit my car agreed to paying for the damage, they then determined he was at fault after admission.
Attorney Answer
Neither version of the officers' finding decides your claim. Fault in a Florida civil case is worked out by the insurers and, if it goes that far, by a jury — on the evidence, not on the box an officer checked. The good news is that the evidence in a rear-end crash usually starts in your favor anyway.
Start with the law of the collision itself. Florida law generally presumes that the following driver in a rear-end collision was negligent. That presumption is rebuttable — the driver behind can offer evidence to overcome it — but it is a real starting advantage, and it does not depend on anyone admitting anything. Alongside it, Fla. Stat. § 316.0895(1) provides: "The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicles and the traffic upon, and the condition of, the highway."
Now the part worth understanding about the admission, because it cuts in an unexpected direction. Section 316.066(4) provides: "Except as specified in this subsection, each crash report made by a person involved in a crash and any statement made by such person to a law enforcement officer for the purpose of completing a crash report required by this section shall be without prejudice to the individual so reporting. Such report or statement may not be used as evidence in any trial, civil or criminal." The subsection has its own exceptions — an officer may testify to such statements at a criminal trial where the privilege against self-incrimination is not violated, and breath, urine and blood test results are not made confidential by it.
So a statement made to the officer for the crash report may not travel into a civil trial. What he said directly to you — that he would pay for the damage — is not a statement made to an officer for the purpose of completing a report, and by the subsection's own terms it sits outside that language. That is why it matters whether you have it in writing.
On the officers' changing conclusion: an amended finding is not a legal ruling. It is one investigator's view, and it can help or hurt at the claim stage without binding anyone later. Do not build your expectations on it in either direction.
If his insurer later argues you share some of the blame, a share of fault reduces what you recover rather than ending the claim — up to a point. For accidents on or after March 24, 2023 — which yours is — § 768.81(2) provides that contributory fault "diminishes proportionately the amount awarded as economic and noneconomic damages for an injury attributable to the claimant's contributory fault, but does not bar recovery, subject to subsection (6)," and § 768.81(6) bars recovery altogether for a party found to be greater than 50 percent at fault for his or her own harm.
Finally, your own coverage. Section 627.736(1) provides personal injury protection up to $10,000 in medical and disability benefits, and § 627.736(1)(a) conditions the medical half on the injured person receiving "initial services and care pursuant to subparagraph 1. within 14 days after the motor vehicle accident."
What you can do
1. If you have any symptoms at all, get examined. Under § 627.736(1)(a), PIP medical benefits require initial services and care within 14 days of the crash, and neck and back symptoms often show up after the first day.
2. Report the crash to your own insurer and open a PIP claim.
3. Save every text, voicemail and message in which he agreed to pay, and take screenshots. Delete nothing.
4. Request the crash report from the agency. Section 316.066(1)(b) requires a long-form report to name the parties, the vehicles, the witnesses and the insurance companies.
5. Do not accept a private cash payment in exchange for signing anything, and do not sign a release, until a lawyer has read it.
6. Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts with someone who can ask you questions is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.
⏱ Time limits apply. Your crash falls on the current side of Florida's 2023 change, so the deadline for a negligence claim is the two-year period in Fla. Stat. § 95.11(5)(a). That is shorter than the four years that older articles still describe, and other facts — who the defendant is, what claims are involved — can move it. Have a Florida attorney confirm the deadline on your specific facts, and do not wait to ask. This page does not calculate your date.
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in Florida
- File or look up a case through the Florida State Courts.
- Get free civil legal help from FloridaLawHelp.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a police officer's fault determination decide a Florida car accident claim?
No. An officer's conclusion is an investigating opinion recorded at the scene, and it can be amended. Insurers weigh it, but civil fault is decided on the whole evidence and, if a case is tried, by the finder of fact. That works both ways: a finding in a claimant's favor does not settle the case, and an unfavorable or undetermined finding does not end it. What tends to matter more is physical evidence, witness accounts and the vehicles themselves.
Can what a driver told the police officer be used in a civil case in Florida?
Often not. Fla. Stat. § 316.066(4) provides that a crash report made by a person involved in a crash, and any statement made by that person to a law enforcement officer for the purpose of completing a crash report, is without prejudice to the person reporting, and that the report or statement may not be used as evidence in any trial, civil or criminal. The subsection carries exceptions, including officer testimony at a criminal trial where the privilege against self-incrimination is not violated, and it does not make breath, urine or blood test results confidential.
Is the rear driver automatically at fault in a Florida rear-end collision?
Not automatically, but Florida law generally presumes the following driver was negligent, and that presumption is rebuttable with evidence. Fla. Stat. § 316.0895(1) separately requires that a driver not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of the vehicles and the traffic upon, and the condition of, the highway. Where a lead driver's own conduct or vehicle contributed, fault can still be divided between them.