Challenging a Custody Order After Improper Service of Papers
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced New Mexico attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Managing Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed May 4, 2026
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
My cousin has custody of my girls right she had someone serve me paper for court put who ever got served the papers wasn't me at my mom so I never new I had court to fight for my kids until I found the papers in my mom's closet but t when I found them it was to late court had passed and I lost full custody of my kids.
Attorney Answer
You can likely ask the same court to set aside the custody judgment because you were never properly served — but you need to act now rather than wait.
New Mexico's rule on relief from judgment lets a party move to set aside a final judgment or order for reasons including mistake, excusable neglect, fraud, or because the judgment is void — for example, one entered without proper service (Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts § 1-060). Grounds like excusable neglect generally must be raised within a reasonable time, often within about a year of the judgment; a judgment that is void for defective service can sometimes be challenged later, but you should not rely on that and should move quickly regardless. A direct appeal of the original custody order is likely no longer available given how much time has passed, so the realistic path is a motion to reopen within the existing case, not a new appeal.
What you can do:
1. Confirm whether the papers found in your mother's closet were the only notice about the court date, or whether there was any other mail, email, or phone communication you may have missed — this shapes how the improper-service argument is presented.
2. Gather proof of when and how the papers surfaced, and any information about who was actually served in your place.
3. File a motion under Rule 1-060 to set aside the custody judgment based on improper service.
4. Have a local family law attorney review the case immediately to confirm which deadline applies to your specific grounds.
⏱ Time limits apply. Motions to set aside a judgment under Rule 1-060 are time-sensitive, with some grounds bounded around one year and others requiring action within a reasonable time. Have a local attorney review your case promptly to confirm the exact deadline that applies.
Relevant Case Law
Classen v. Classen, 893 P.2d 478 (1995) — New Mexico Court of Appeals
We hold that the trial court erred in ruling solely on the record below that Husband’s due process rights were not violated because of improper service of process.
It shows a New Mexico court will reopen a custody decree entered on defective service, supporting the advice to file a Rule 1-060 motion to set the judgment aside.
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in New Mexico
- File or look up a case through the New Mexico Courts, which serves the state.
- Get free civil legal help from New Mexico Legal Aid.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a custody judgment be reopened if a parent was never properly served with notice?
In many states, a party can move to set aside a judgment for reasons including improper service, mistake, or fraud, though strict deadlines generally apply.
How much time does a parent have to challenge a custody order for lack of notice?
In New Mexico it depends on the ground. Under Rule 1-060(B) NMRA, a motion based on mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect must be filed within a reasonable time and no more than one year after the judgment was entered. A motion arguing the judgment is void — the usual ground where a party was never properly served — is subject only to the reasonable-time requirement, with no one-year cap. Rule stated as of publication.
Is a direct appeal still possible after missing a custody hearing?
Generally, a direct appeal becomes unavailable once the appeal window passes, making a motion to reopen the existing case the more realistic path.