1LAW Logo

Claims When a Repossession Turns Into a Collision

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Texas attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed April 3, 2024

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

A wrecker driver attempting to repo the vehicle while my wife was in the car struck the vehicle multiple times. Then, as I took the vehicle, he chased and collided with the front left, trying to stop the vehicle, then rear-ended it 3 times before I was able to get to the safety of family's fenced property. Also, I myself was struck by the wrecker as he attempted to chase my wife. Drivers were arrested for this.

Attorney Answer

Yes, and more than one claim. Ramming an occupied car is not repossession, and the arrests point at conduct the law treats as assault rather than as a lawful self-help remedy. Whether the lender was entitled to take the vehicle back is a separate question, and it is not a defense to hitting people with a wrecker.

Two tracks are running at once and they do not depend on each other. The criminal case belongs to the State, and the arrests are its business, not yours to control. Tex. Penal Code § 22.01(a)(1) makes it an offense to intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly cause bodily injury to another. Subsection (a)(2) reaches intentionally or knowingly threatening another with imminent bodily injury, and (a)(3) reaches intentionally or knowingly causing physical contact another will regard as offensive or provocative. Those describe what you say happened. But a conviction is not what pays for your injuries, and an acquittal would not end your civil case.

Your civil claims are separate and they are yours. Deliberately driving a wrecker into an occupied vehicle, chasing it, and striking a person supports claims for the bodily injuries to you and to your wife and for the damage to the vehicle. Texas apportions responsibility by percentage: Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.003 has the trier of fact assign a percentage to each claimant, defendant, settling person and designated responsible third party; § 33.012(a) reduces a claimant's damages by the claimant's own percentage; and § 33.001 bars recovery entirely for a claimant more than 50 percent responsible. Section 33.013(a) makes each liable defendant responsible only for its own percentage, but § 33.013(b) restores joint and several liability where a defendant's share exceeds 50 percent or where the defendant acted in concert with another with specific intent to do harm in committing certain listed Penal Code offenses. With more than one driver involved, that allocation is where the case is won.

The company behind the driver usually matters more than the driver. Texas asks two questions about that: whether the person was the company's employee, and whether he was acting in the course and scope of that employment when it happened. The Texas Supreme Court set out that two-step inquiry in Painter v. Amerimex Drilling I, Ltd., 561 S.W.3d 125 (Tex. 2018), holding that the ordinary rule excluding an employee's travel gives way when the employer directed the task the employee was performing. Painter is not about repossession, and whether deliberate acts fall inside the scope of employment is its own contested question — but the framework is how a claim reaches the towing company, the repossession agency, or the lender who hired them, and those are the parties likely to carry insurance.

Separately, Texas law limits self-help repossession. A repossession may not be carried out in a way that breaches the peace, and the statute drawing that line is not one this page is permitted to set out. Ask a lawyer to apply it, because it can reach the lender directly.

What you can do

1. Get medical care for yourself and your wife and keep going. Adrenaline hides injuries and untreated injuries are treated as minor ones.

2. Keep the vehicle exactly as it is and do not repair it yet. The pattern of damage — front left, then the rear impacts — is evidence of what happened.

3. Preserve what already exists: photographs and video already on your phones, the damaged vehicle, the loan and repossession paperwork, and any towing company or agency name, phone number or business card you were given.

4. Request the incident and crash reports from the responding agency's records division and ask for the case numbers from the arrests.

5. Do not discuss the loan, the default or the repossession with the lender, the towing company, or any insurer, and do not write out an account for them.

6. Take it to a Texas personal injury attorney promptly, and tell them at the first call that arrests were made and that a repossession was underway.

*Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts — starting with who the wrecker driver actually worked for — is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.*

⏱ Time limits apply. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003(a) generally gives two years from the day the cause of action accrues for both personal injury and property damage. The criminal case runs on its own separate schedule that this page does not set. When your clock started depends on your facts, so have a Texas attorney review the dates now rather than waiting for the criminal case to finish.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Painter v. Amerimex Drilling I, Ltd., 561 S.W.3d 125 (Tex. 2018) — Supreme Court of Texas
    Sets the two-step vicarious liability inquiry — employee status, then course and scope — and holds the coming-and-going rule yields where the employer assigned the task being performed. Cited because reaching the towing or repossession company through its driver is the practical heart of this claim and no cited statute states the employer-liability rule.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in Texas

Frequently Asked Questions

Can someone sue a repossession company after the repo agent hits their car or injures them?

Injuries and property damage caused during a repossession are ordinary civil claims, and they do not depend on whether the lender had a right to take the vehicle. Texas apportions responsibility by percentage: Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.003 has the trier of fact assign a percentage to each claimant, defendant, settling person and responsible third party; § 33.012(a) reduces damages by the claimant's own percentage; § 33.001 bars a claimant more than 50 percent responsible; and § 33.013(a) makes each defendant liable only for its own percentage, with § 33.013(b) restoring joint and several liability above 50 percent or for listed concerted intentional conduct. Reaching the company behind the driver is usually the point of the case.

When is a company responsible in Texas for what its driver did on the job?

Texas asks two questions: whether the person was the company's employee, and whether he was acting in the course and scope of that employment at the time. The Texas Supreme Court set out that two-step inquiry in Painter v. Amerimex Drilling I, Ltd., 561 S.W.3d 125 (Tex. 2018), where it held that the general rule excluding an employee's travel does not apply when the employer directed the task the employee was carrying out. Whether a deliberate act falls within the scope of employment is a further contested question, decided on the particular facts, and it is one a lawyer has to develop rather than assume.

Does an arrest mean the injured person will be compensated?

No. A criminal case is brought by the State to punish an offense, and it is not a mechanism for paying an injured person's medical bills or repairing a vehicle. Restitution is sometimes ordered, which is a question for the prosecutor's office, but it is limited and it is not a substitute for a civil claim. The civil case is separate, is brought by the injured person, and is decided under a lower standard of proof — so it can succeed even where a prosecution does not, and it should not be put on hold waiting for the criminal case to end.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices