1LAW Logo

Event Decor Failure: A Vendor's Liability Exposure in Texas

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Texas attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed December 16, 2023

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

We do decorations for events. Recently one of the decoration items fell down and injured customers. Need some legal advice.

Attorney Answer

Treat this as a live claim from each injured person, and act on it this week. The first moves are not legal arguments — they are notifying your liability insurer and preserving the item that fell, along with everything that held it up.

Two overlapping bodies of law apply. If your company was in control of the space where the décor was installed, the premises framework governs. Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 648 S.W.2d 292 (Tex. 1983), states the duty owed to an invitee: reasonable care to protect against unreasonable risks of harm that the occupier knows or should know about. Keetch v. Kroger Co., 845 S.W.2d 262 (Tex. 1992), sets out what a claimant must prove — actual or constructive knowledge of the condition, an unreasonable risk of harm, a failure to use reasonable care to reduce or eliminate the risk, and proximate cause.

Keetch also holds that a defendant who created the condition may be found to have known of it, though that alone does not establish knowledge as a matter of law. That holding matters a great deal to a company in your position, because you did not encounter the hazard — you built it. The case will be about how the item was rigged, what it was anchored to, what load it carried, who installed it, what your own install and inspection routine is, and whether anything about the venue's structure was outside your control.

You are probably not the only party in the frame. The venue, the event host, the manufacturer of a failed fastener or bracket, and anyone who moved or adjusted the item afterward can all be in it. Texas apportions this. Under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.003, the trier of fact assigns whole-number percentages of responsibility among each claimant, each defendant, settling persons, and properly designated responsible third parties. Under § 33.013(a), a liable defendant generally pays only its own percentage — Texas is not a joint-and-several state by default — with the narrow exceptions in § 33.013(b) for a defendant more than 50 percent responsible or one acting in concert in certain intentional conduct. And under § 33.001, a claimant found more than 50 percent responsible recovers nothing, with § 33.012(a) reducing anything below that line by the claimant's own share.

What you can do

1. Notify your general liability insurer in writing today, even though nothing has been filed. Give the date, the venue, what fell, and the names and contact information of everyone injured. Late notice is a coverage problem you do not need.

2. Preserve the item and every piece of its hardware — brackets, anchors, ties, clamps, the fasteners, and whatever it was attached to if you can get it. Bag it, label it, store it, and do not repair, clean or discard any of it.

3. Photograph everything now: the failure point, the mounting surface, the surrounding setup, and any comparable installation you did that day.

4. Pull the paperwork together — your contract with the client, your agreement with the venue, any certificate of insurance, and any indemnity or hold-harmless language in either. Send it to your insurer and to your lawyer, not to the claimants.

5. Write down who installed the item, when, and what your inspection or load-check practice is, and collect any install notes, photographs or texts from the crew that day.

6. Do not discuss fault with the injured customers or anyone acting for them, and do not offer or make payments toward their medical bills. Route every call, letter and demand to your insurer.

7. Have a Texas attorney — the one your insurer appoints, or your own — review anything before you respond to a demand, and ask early about whether a responsible third party should be designated.

Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts with a Texas attorney is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003(a) gives an injured person two years from the day the cause of action accrues to bring a personal-injury suit, so your exposure window is not open-ended — but it is long enough that evidence disappears first. Do not compute the date yourself or assume anything has expired; have a Texas attorney confirm where each claim stands, and keep the preserved item and records until every one of them is closed.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 648 S.W.2d 292 (Tex. 1983) — Texas Supreme Court
    Cited from the row's verified cases for the invitee duty: an occupier owes an invitee reasonable care against unreasonable risks of harm it knows or should know about.
  • Keetch v. Kroger Co., 845 S.W.2d 262 (Tex. 1992) — Texas Supreme Court
    Cited from the row's verified cases for the elements: actual or constructive knowledge of the condition, unreasonable risk of harm, failure to use reasonable care, and proximate cause; creating the condition may permit a knowledge finding but does not establish knowledge as a matter of law.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in Texas

Frequently Asked Questions

What does an injured visitor have to prove in a Texas premises-liability case?

Under Keetch v. Kroger Co., 845 S.W.2d 262 (Tex. 1992), a premises-condition claim by an invitee turns on four things: the owner or occupier had actual or constructive knowledge of the condition; the condition posed an unreasonable risk of harm; the owner or occupier failed to use reasonable care to reduce or eliminate the risk; and that failure proximately caused the injury. Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 648 S.W.2d 292 (Tex. 1983), states the underlying duty: reasonable care against unreasonable risks the occupier knows or should know about. Keetch also holds that an owner who created the condition may be found to have known of it, but that fact alone does not establish knowledge as a matter of law.

Can more than one business be responsible when a customer is injured at an event?

Yes, and Texas divides the responsibility rather than pooling it. Under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.003, the trier of fact assigns whole-number percentages of responsibility to each claimant, each defendant, any settling person, and any properly designated responsible third party. Under § 33.013(a), a liable defendant generally pays only the percentage assigned to it — joint and several liability is the exception, not the rule, and applies under § 33.013(b) only where a defendant is more than 50 percent responsible or acted in concert in certain intentional conduct. That structure is why identifying every party who contributed to a failure, early, matters as much to a defendant as to a claimant.

Does being partly at fault stop a premises-liability recovery in Texas?

Not unless the injured person's share is large enough. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.001 bars recovery only if the claimant's percentage of responsibility is greater than 50 percent. Below that line, § 33.012(a) reduces the damages by the claimant's own percentage. Texas is not a pure comparative-fault state, and it is not a state where one defendant automatically owes the whole judgment: under § 33.013(a) a defendant generally pays only its own percentage, unless § 33.013(b) applies because that defendant is more than 50 percent responsible or acted in concert in certain intentional conduct.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices