1LAW Logo

Falling Tool at a Car Wash: Premises Liability in Texas

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Texas attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed December 16, 2021

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I was washing my car at an older car wash, and a crescent wrench fell down from the machine above and hit me right in the head, and I suffered a concussion.

Attorney Answer

Yes — a tool falling out of the business's own overhead equipment onto a customer's head is about as strong a starting point as a Texas premises case gets. It is still a claim you have to prove, but the facts point the right way.

A paying customer at a car wash is an invitee. Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 648 S.W.2d 292 (Tex. 1983), states the duty the business owes: reasonable care to protect against unreasonable risks of harm on the property that it knows about or should know about. Keetch v. Kroger Co., 845 S.W.2d 262 (Tex. 1992), sets out the elements — the business had actual or constructive knowledge of the condition, the condition posed an unreasonable risk of harm, the business failed to use reasonable care to reduce or eliminate the risk, and that failure proximately caused the injury.

Two things make this fact pattern different from an ordinary slip-and-fall. First, the object came from the business's own machinery, overhead, in a bay it controls. A customer had no way to see it, avoid it, or contribute to it, so the comparative-fault argument that sinks many premises claims is very weak here. Second, a crescent wrench does not arrive in a car-wash machine on its own. Somebody working on that equipment left it there. Keetch holds that a business that created the condition may be found to have known of it, though that fact alone does not establish knowledge as a matter of law — so who serviced the machine, when, and under what maintenance routine becomes the heart of the case.

The proof lives with the business: maintenance and repair logs, the service company's work orders, the identity of whoever last opened that housing, and the bay video. An older facility often has a documented history of breakdowns and repairs, and that history is what turns "a wrench fell" into "they should have caught it."

A concussion is a real injury even when nothing shows on a scan. What the claim is worth turns on the medical records and the treating doctors' findings, and nobody can responsibly put a number on it from a description.

What you can do

1. Make sure the concussion has been evaluated and follow up if symptoms — headaches, light sensitivity, memory or sleep trouble, mood changes — are still there. Untreated gaps in care are the first thing an insurer points to.

2. Keep the wrench if you have it, untouched and bagged. If you do not, write down exactly where it landed. It is physical evidence tied to a specific piece of equipment.

3. Photograph the bay, the machine overhead, and the spot where you were standing. Note the bay number and the date and approximate time.

4. Keep the receipt or card statement for the wash. It fixes the location and the time.

5. Report it to the business in writing and ask for the incident report number and a copy. Email leaves a record that you asked.

6. Do not give the business's insurer a recorded statement or sign anything they send before you have talked with a lawyer, and do not accept a quick offer made before you know how the concussion resolves.

7. Ask a Texas attorney about sending a written demand that the business preserve the wrench, the maintenance and service records for that machine, and the video from that day. Video at a small facility is often overwritten within days.

Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts with a Texas attorney is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.

⏱ Time limits apply. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003(a) requires a personal-injury suit to be brought not later than two years after the day the cause of action accrues. Exactly when that period ends depends on your own facts, so have a Texas attorney review the dates rather than counting them yourself. The practical deadline is much shorter: the maintenance records and video that would prove who left the wrench there do not survive two years.

Cases Cited

Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.

  • Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 648 S.W.2d 292 (Tex. 1983) — Texas Supreme Court
    Cited from the row's verified cases for the invitee duty: an occupier owes an invitee reasonable care against unreasonable risks of harm it knows or should know about.
  • Keetch v. Kroger Co., 845 S.W.2d 262 (Tex. 1992) — Texas Supreme Court
    Cited from the row's verified cases for the elements: actual or constructive knowledge of the condition, unreasonable risk of harm, failure to use reasonable care, and proximate cause; creating the condition may permit a knowledge finding but does not establish knowledge as a matter of law.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in Texas

Frequently Asked Questions

What does an injured visitor have to prove in a Texas premises-liability case?

Under Keetch v. Kroger Co., 845 S.W.2d 262 (Tex. 1992), a premises-condition claim by an invitee turns on four things: the owner or occupier had actual or constructive knowledge of the condition; the condition posed an unreasonable risk of harm; the owner or occupier failed to use reasonable care to reduce or eliminate the risk; and that failure proximately caused the injury. Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 648 S.W.2d 292 (Tex. 1983), states the underlying duty: reasonable care against unreasonable risks the occupier knows or should know about. Keetch also holds that an owner who created the condition may be found to have known of it, but that fact alone does not establish knowledge as a matter of law.

Is a business automatically responsible when someone is injured on its property in Texas?

No. Texas does not make a property owner an insurer of everyone who comes onto the premises. The duty described in Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 648 S.W.2d 292 (Tex. 1983), is reasonable care against unreasonable risks the occupier knows or should know about, and an injury by itself does not prove that duty was breached. What usually decides these cases is whether the business knew or should have known of the dangerous condition — through inspection records, maintenance logs, prior complaints, or because the business created the condition itself.

Does it help a Texas premises claim if the business itself created the hazard?

It helps, but it does not decide the case. Keetch v. Kroger Co., 845 S.W.2d 262 (Tex. 1992), holds that evidence the owner or occupier created the condition may permit a finding that it knew of the condition, while stopping short of establishing that knowledge as a matter of law. The claimant still has to prove the other elements — that the condition posed an unreasonable risk of harm, that the occupier failed to use reasonable care about it, and that the failure caused the injury. Where a hazard came out of the business's own equipment, the maintenance and service records usually decide the knowledge question, which is why they should be requested before they are discarded.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices