1LAW Logo

Intoxication Charges and the Other Driver's Alcohol Level

Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Texas attorney, with no obligation.

JV

Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*

Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed June 5, 2023

Legal Inquiry

Consumer Legal Issue

I been charged with intoxicated manslaughter, but I don't know if the accident was my fault. The other driver, that passed, his alcohol level was above mine.

Attorney Answer

No. In Texas, being less intoxicated than the other driver is not a defense. Intoxication is measured against a fixed standard, not against the other person. But the other driver's condition is not irrelevant either — it can matter to the separate question of what actually caused the collision. That is work for a criminal-defense lawyer, starting now.

Tex. Penal Code § 49.01(2) defines the term for the whole chapter. "Intoxicated" means not having the normal use of mental or physical faculties by reason of the introduction of alcohol, a controlled substance, a drug, a dangerous drug, a combination of two or more of those substances, or any other substance into the body; or having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more. Section 49.01(1) fixes how alcohol concentration is measured — grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath, 100 milliliters of blood, or 67 milliliters of urine. Nothing in that definition compares one driver's level to another's. A person over the line is over the line even if someone else was further over it.

Section 49.11(a) closes off another common hope. Notwithstanding Penal Code § 6.02(b), proof of a culpable mental state is not required for conviction of an offense under chapter 49. So the State does not have to prove you meant to do anything, or that you were careless in some particular way. Intent arguments that work in other kinds of cases do not work on the intoxication element here.

Where the other driver's alcohol level can matter is causation. The charge you describe is not made out by intoxication alone; the State also has to connect the death to it. What this page is permitted to set out does not include the elements of that particular offense, so do not take the details from here — get them from a defense lawyer, in writing, along with what the State has to prove on each one. But the shape of the point is worth knowing: evidence that the other driver's own driving caused the collision goes to the causation half of the case, not to whether you were intoxicated. Those are different fights, and they are won or lost on the crash reconstruction, the toxicology, and the timing.

There is very likely to be a civil case as well. A family's wrongful death claim is separate from the prosecution, it moves on its own schedule, and things said in one case reach the other. Under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.001 a claimant more than 50 percent responsible recovers nothing, and § 33.012(a) reduces damages by the claimant's own percentage — so the other driver's conduct has a role on that side too. None of that should be handled without your criminal lawyer's knowledge.

What you can do

1. Say nothing about the crash to anyone — not police, not investigators, not the other family, not any insurance company, and not friends or on any phone call from custody. Do not write out an account for anyone, including yourself.

2. If you do not already have a criminal-defense lawyer, get one immediately, and if you cannot afford one, ask the court to appoint counsel at your next setting. This is the only step on this page that matters more than the others.

3. Give that lawyer everything that already exists — the charging papers, bond conditions, any hospital or toxicology paperwork you were handed, and any letters you have received. Do not create new documents.

4. Do not sign anything from an insurance company, and send any lawsuit papers or claim letters to your criminal-defense lawyer the day they arrive.

5. Ask that lawyer whether you also need a separate civil attorney, and let the two coordinate. What is said in the civil case can be used in the criminal one.

*Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts — above all what the toxicology and the reconstruction actually show — is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.*

⏱ Time limits apply. Criminal deadlines and court settings are set by the court and the charging documents, not by this page. On the civil side, Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003(b) requires suit for an injury resulting in death not later than two years after the cause of action accrues, and the cause of action accrues on the death of the injured person — the clock runs from the death, not from a later date. Have a Texas attorney review every date against your own papers now.

*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.

By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.

Courts & Legal Aid in Texas

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the other driver's higher blood alcohol level help someone charged under Texas's intoxication offenses?

Not on the intoxication element. Tex. Penal Code § 49.01(2) defines 'intoxicated' as not having the normal use of mental or physical faculties by reason of alcohol, a controlled substance, a drug, a dangerous drug, a combination of those, or any other substance, or as having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more. It is an absolute standard, with no comparison to anyone else's level. Where the other driver's condition can matter is causation — evidence about how the collision actually happened is a different part of the case from whether a person was intoxicated, and it takes a defense lawyer and expert proof to develop.

Does Texas require proof of intent for a driving-while-intoxicated offense?

No. Tex. Penal Code § 49.11(a) provides that, notwithstanding § 6.02(b), proof of a culpable mental state is not required for conviction of an offense under chapter 49; § 49.11(b) carves out one offense, under § 49.031. In practical terms, arguments that a person did not mean to cause harm, or did not realize how impaired they were, do not defeat the intoxication element. Defense work in these cases usually goes to the reliability of the testing, the timing of it, and to causation, not to intent.

How long does a family have to bring a wrongful death claim in Texas?

Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003(b) requires a person to bring suit not later than two years after the day the cause of action accrues in an action for injury resulting in death, and provides that the cause of action accrues on the death of the injured person. The clock therefore runs from the death, which is not always the same date as the accident. Accrual and any exception to it turn on the particular facts, so the dates should be checked by a Texas attorney rather than counted from a general rule.

Privacy Policy Terms of Use Your Privacy Choices