Recovering for a Dog Bite Injury Under Texas Law
Start a free AI-assisted chat and connect with an experienced Texas attorney, with no obligation.
Reviewed & verified by A. Jason Velez, Esq.*
Founding Attorney, 1LAW · Last reviewed January 2024
Legal Inquiry
Consumer Legal Issue
My ex-girlfriend's dog bit me in the face 2 months ago. I had my lip sewn back together with sutures. At the time I didn't
Attorney Answer
Not automatically. Texas has no statute that makes a dog owner liable simply because the dog bit someone, so a claim generally has to show either that the owner knew or should have known the dog was dangerous, or that the owner handled the dog carelessly. An injury to the face with sutures is serious, and a claim like this can be worth pursuing — but the legal question is about the owner's knowledge and conduct, not just about the bite.
People are often told that Texas has a dog-bite law. It has a dog chapter, but it works differently than that. Tex. Health & Safety Code § 822.005 creates a criminal offense in narrow circumstances involving an unprovoked attack off the owner's property causing serious bodily injury or death, or an owner who knows the dog has been determined to be a dangerous dog. Section 822.041(2) defines a dangerous dog, and § 822.042(a) requires the owner of one to register the animal, restrain it, and carry $100,000 in liability coverage or other financial responsibility. Those provisions are criminal and regulatory. They are not a civil strict-liability rule, though a dangerous-dog determination or the required coverage can matter a great deal in practice.
The civil rule comes from the Texas Supreme Court. In Marshall v. Ranne, 511 S.W.2d 255 (Tex. 1974), the court held that an owner is strictly liable for injuries caused by an animal the owner knows or should know is vicious. It also held that the injured person's ordinary contributory negligence is not a defense to that strict-liability claim, though a true voluntary assumption of a known risk is. Where the animal is not shown to be vicious, the claim proceeds instead on ordinary negligence — whether the owner used reasonable care in keeping and handling the dog.
So the practical question in your case is what the owner knew. Had the dog bitten, snapped, or lunged at anyone before? Was it kept muzzled, crated, or behind a sign? Did anyone warn you? Answers like those move a claim from the negligence track to the stronger strict-liability track.
If the claim is a negligence claim, Texas's fault statute applies to your side too. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.001 bars a claimant whose percentage of responsibility is greater than 50 percent from recovering anything, and § 33.012(a) requires the court to reduce damages by a percentage equal to the claimant's own percentage of responsibility.
What you can do
1. Get complete copies of your medical records and bills, including the emergency visit and the suture repair, and keep going to any follow-up care for the scarring.
2. Photograph your face now and at intervals as it heals. Scarring changes, and there is no way to recreate the early images later.
3. Ask your city or county animal-control office for any prior reports or complaints about this dog, and for the bite report if one was made. Requesting agency records is something you can do yourself.
4. Preserve your text messages and any other written exchanges with the owner about the dog, before or after the bite. Do not delete anything.
5. Find out whether the owner has homeowner's or renter's insurance, since that is usually where payment for a bite claim comes from.
6. Talk to a Texas attorney about which theory fits your facts before you give a recorded statement to any insurer or accept any offer.
7. Most lawyers offer a brief initial call at no cost, and a few minutes on your specific facts with a Texas attorney is worth more than any general guidance, including this page.
⏱ Time limits apply. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003(a) requires a personal-injury suit to be brought not later than two years after the day the cause of action accrues. Exactly when that period ends depends on your facts, so have a Texas attorney review the dates rather than counting from a page like this.
Cases Cited
Published decisions relevant to this issue, provided as legal background rather than advice about any particular case.
- Marshall v. Ranne, 511 S.W.2d 255 (Tex. 1974) — Supreme Court of Texas
Strict liability for an animal the owner knows or should know is vicious; ordinary contributory negligence is not a defense to that claim, though a true voluntary assumption of a known risk is; negligence governs animals not shown to be vicious.
*Attorney review is supported by AI-assisted drafting and legal research algorithms. Use of this Chat does not create an attorney-client relationship.
By using this service you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy.
Courts & Legal Aid in Texas
- File or look up a case through the Texas Judicial Branch.
- Get free civil legal help from TexasLawHelp.
- Use the LSC — Find Legal Aid to find a local legal-aid office by ZIP code.
- Use the LawHelp.org to browse free legal information and self-help resources.
- Use the ABA Lawyer Referral Directory to get matched with a local attorney through your state bar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a dog owner automatically liable for a bite in Texas?
No. Texas has no civil strict-liability dog-bite statute. Under Marshall v. Ranne, 511 S.W.2d 255 (Tex. 1974), an owner is strictly liable for an animal the owner knows or should know is vicious; where the animal is not shown to be vicious, the injured person must prove ordinary negligence in how the owner kept or handled it.
What kind of evidence supports a Texas dog-bite claim?
Because the owner's knowledge is often the pivot, prior bites, prior complaints to animal control, warnings given to visitors, and how the dog was normally restrained all matter. Medical records, bills and photographs documenting the injury and any scarring establish the harm. Animal-control records can usually be requested directly from the city or county.
Do the Health and Safety Code dog provisions create a right to sue in Texas?
They are criminal and regulatory rather than a civil damages rule. Tex. Health & Safety Code § 822.005 defines a felony offense in narrow circumstances, § 822.041(2) defines a dangerous dog, and § 822.042(a) requires a dangerous dog's owner to register it, restrain it, and carry $100,000 in liability coverage or other financial responsibility. Civil liability still runs through the common-law rules.